This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994;21: 33–43.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Soliman M, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. Effect of changing a test parameter on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2005;75:832–5.Search in Google Scholar
Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982;81:93–8.Search in Google Scholar
Travess H, Roberts-Harry D, Sandy J. Orthodontics. Part 6: Risks in orthodontic treatment. Br Dent J 2004;196:71–7.Search in Google Scholar
Armstrong D, Shen G, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. Excess adhesive flash upon bracket placement. A typodont study comparing APC PLUS and Transbond XT. Angle Orthod 2007;77:1101–8.Search in Google Scholar
Endo T, Ozoe R, Shinkai K, Aoyagi M, Kurokawa H, Katoh Y, Shimooka S. Shear bond strength of brackets rebonded with a fluoride-releasing and recharging adhesive system. Angle Orthod 2009;79:564–70.Search in Google Scholar
Vicente A, Mena A, Ortiz AJ, Bravo LA. Water and saliva contamination effect on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a moisture-tolerant light cure system. Angle Orthod 2009;79:127–32.Search in Google Scholar
Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol 1968;13:61–70.Search in Google Scholar
Gilpatrick RO, Ross JA, Simonsen RJ. Resin-to-enamel bond strengths with various etching times. Quintessence Int 1991;22:47–9.Search in Google Scholar
Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnett AJ. Effects of 15 vs 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology. Oper Dent 1986;11:111–16.Search in Google Scholar
Imthiaz N, Georgiou G, Moles DR, Jones SP. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and dental enamel for testing shear bond strengths. Aust Orthod J 2008;24:15–20.Search in Google Scholar
Jones SP, Cheuk GC, Georgiou G, Moles DR. Comparison of fluoridated apatites with pure hydroxyapatite as potential biomimetic alternatives to enamel for laboratory-based bond strength studies. Aust Orthod J 2009;25:12–18.Search in Google Scholar
Daskalogiannakis J. Glossary of Orthodontic Terms. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company, Inc., 2000; 112.Search in Google Scholar
Moseley HC, Horrocks EN, Pearson GJ, Davies EH. Effects of cyclic stressing on attachment bond strength using glass ionomer cement and composite resin. Br J Orthod 1995;22: 23–7.Search in Google Scholar
Scherrer SS, Wiskott AH, Coto-Hunziker V, Belser UC. Monotonic flexure and fatigue strength of composites for provisional and definitive restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:579–88.Search in Google Scholar
Gwinnett AJ. Bonding of restorative resins to enamel. Int Dent J 1988;38:91–6.Search in Google Scholar
Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing. Dent Mater 2005;21: 139–44.Search in Google Scholar
Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171–8.Search in Google Scholar
Tavas MA, Watts DC. Bonding of orthodontic brackets by transillumination of a light activated composite: An in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1979;6:207–8.Search in Google Scholar
Lopez JI. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. Am J Orthod 1980;77:669–78.Search in Google Scholar
Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing. Dent Mater 2005; 21:391–6.Search in Google Scholar
Hashim NA. Fatigue of a new fluoride-releasing composite bonding agent. MSc. Thesis, University of London 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Brantley WA, Eliades T, Litsky. Chapter 2: Mechanics and mechanical testing of orthodontic materials. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T, eds. Orthodontic Materials: Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme, 2001; 43–5.Search in Google Scholar
