This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Millett DT, Hallgren A, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, Robertson M, Love J. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod 1998;68:351–6.Search in Google Scholar
Linklater RA, Gordon PH, Bond failure patterns in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:534–9.Search in Google Scholar
Adolfsson U, Larsson E, Ogaard B. Bond failure of a no-mix adhesive during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:277–81.Search in Google Scholar
Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:476–83.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien KD, Read MJ, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: An in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95: 348–51.Search in Google Scholar
Trimpeneers LM, Dermaut LR. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of two orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:547–50.Search in Google Scholar
Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: A randomized clinical trial. Brit J Orthod 1998; 25:283–7.Search in Google Scholar
Tang ATH, Björkman L, Lindbäck KF, Andlin-Sobocki A, Ekstrand J. Retrospective study of orthodontic bonding without liquid resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:300–6.Search in Google Scholar
Armas Galindo HR, Sadowsky PL, Vlachos C, Jacobson A,Wallace D. An in-vivo comparison between a visible light-cured bonding system and a chemically cured bonding system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:271–5.Search in Google Scholar
Millett DT, Hallgren A, Fornell AC, Robertson M. Bonded molar tubes: A retrospective evaluation of clinical performance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:667–74.Search in Google Scholar
Pandis N, Christensen L, Eliades T. Long-term clinical failure rate of molar tubes bonded with a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 2005;75:1000–2.Search in Google Scholar
Banks P, Macfarlane TV. Bonded versus banded first molar attachments: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orthod 2007;34:128–36.Search in Google Scholar
Mui B, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. Optimization of a procedure for rebonding dislodged orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 1999;69:276–81.Search in Google Scholar
Grabouski JK, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. The effect of microetching on the bond strength of metal brackets when bonded to previously bonded teeth: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:452–60.Search in Google Scholar
Sonis AL. Air abrasion of failed bonded metal brackets: a study of shear bond strength and surface characteristics as determined by scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:96–8.Search in Google Scholar
Sunna S, Rock WP. Effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic brackets: a controlled clinical trial. J Orthod 2008;35:43–8.Search in Google Scholar
Thind BS, Larmour CJ, Stirrups DR, Lloyd CH. An ex vivo assessment of gingivally offset lower premolar brackets. J Orthod 2004;31:34–40.Search in Google Scholar
Thind BS, Stirrups DR, Hewage S. Bond failure of gingivally offset mandibular premolar brackets: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135:49–53.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Laffoon JF, Vonwald L, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:521–5.Search in Google Scholar
Linklater RA, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study to investigate bond strengths of different tooth types. J Orthod 2001;28: 59–65.Search in Google Scholar
Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mater 2001;17: 184–9.Search in Google Scholar
Öztürk B, Malkoç S, Koyutürk AE, Catalbas B, Ozer F. Influence of different tooth types on the bond strength of two orthodontic adhesive systems. Eur J Orthod 2008;30: 407–12.Search in Google Scholar
Fricker JP, McLachlan MD. Clinical studies of glass ionomer cements. Part 1: a twelve-month clinical study comparing zinc phosphate cement to glass ionomer. Aust Orthod J 1985;9:179–80.Search in Google Scholar
Gillgrass TJ, Benington PC, Millett DT, Newell J, Gilmour WH. Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:49–53.Search in Google Scholar
Mizrahi E. Glass ionomer cements in orthodontics – an update. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:505–7.Search in Google Scholar
Millett DT, McCabe JF, Bennett TG, Carter NE, Gordon PH. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of first molar orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod 1995;22:161–9.Search in Google Scholar
Stirrups DR. A comparative clinical trial of a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate cement for securing orthodontic bands. Br J Orthod 1991;18:15–20.Search in Google Scholar
Millett DT, Gordon PH. The performance of first molar orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer cement – a retrospective analysis. Br J Orthod 1992;19:215–20.Search in Google Scholar
Millett DT, Hallgren A, McCluskey LA, McAuley F, Fornell AC, Love J et al. A clinical retrospective evaluation of two orthodontic band cements. Angle Orthod 2001;71:470–6.Search in Google Scholar
