This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28:113–30.Search in Google Scholar
Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary Orthodontics. St Louis: Mosby, 1992;160–1.Search in Google Scholar
Becker A, Smith P, Behar R. The incidence of anomalous lateral incisors in relation to palatally displaced cuspid. Angle Orthod 1981;51:24–9.Search in Google Scholar
Brin I, Becker A, Shalhav M. Position of the maxillary permanent canine in relation to anomalous lateral incisors: a population study. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:12–16.Search in Google Scholar
Oliver RG, Mannion JE, Robinson JM. Morphology of lateral incisor in cases of unilateral impaction of the maxillary canine. Br J Orthod 1989;16:9–16.Search in Google Scholar
Zilberman Y, Cohen B, Becker A. Familial trends in palatal canines, anomalous lateral incisor and related phenomena. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:135–9.Search in Google Scholar
Langberg BJ, Peck S. Tooth-size reduction associated with occurrence of palatal displacement of canines. Angle Orthod 2000;70:126–8.Search in Google Scholar
Mossey PA, Campbell HM, Luffingham JK. The palatal canine and the adjacent lateral incisor: a study of a west of Scotland population. Br J Orthod 1994;21:169–74.Search in Google Scholar
Brenchley Z, Oliver RG. Morphology of anterior teeth associated with displaced canines. Br J Orthod 1997; 24:344–5.Search in Google Scholar
Al-Nimri K, Gharaibeh T. Space conditions and dental and occlusal features in patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines: an etiological study. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27: 461–5.Search in Google Scholar
British Standard Institute 1983 BS4492, British Standard Glossary of Terms relating to Dentistry. London: British Standards Institution, 1983.Search in Google Scholar
Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen & Unwin: 1940.Search in Google Scholar
Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The Class II division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:529–35.Search in Google Scholar
Buschang PH, Stroud J, Alexander RG. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1994;16: 47–52.Search in Google Scholar
Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Class II division 2 malocclusion: a heritable pattern of small teeth in well-developed jaws. Angle Orthod 1998;68:9–20.Search in Google Scholar
Sperry TP, Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM. Tooth-size discrepancy in mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1977; 72:183–90.Search in Google Scholar
Arya BS, Savara BS, Thomas D, Clarkson Q. Relation of sex and occlusion to mesiodistal tooth size. Am J Orthod 1974; 66:479–86.Search in Google Scholar
Doris JM, Bernard BW, Kuftinec MM, Stom D. A biometric study of tooth size and dental crowding. Am J Orthod 1981; 79:326–36.Search in Google Scholar
Lavelle CL. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod 1972;61:29–37.Search in Google Scholar
Smith SS, Buschang PH, Watanabe E. Interarch tooth size relationships of 3 populations, “Does Bolton’s analysis apply?”. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117: 169–74.Search in Google Scholar
Nie Q, Lin J. Comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:539–44.Search in Google Scholar
Ta TA, Ling JYK, Hägg U. Tooth-size discrepancies among different occlusion groups of southern Chinese children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:556–8.Search in Google Scholar
Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Pardi VA, Cangialosi TJ. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod 2000;70:303–7.Search in Google Scholar
