This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 1984:86:67–73.Search in Google Scholar
Blanchette ME, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Ghosh J, Nanda SK. A longitudinal cephalometric study of the soft tisue profile of short- and long-face syndromes from 7 to 17 years. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:116–31.Search in Google Scholar
Brandt S, Safirstein GR. Different extractions for different malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1975;68:15–41.Search in Google Scholar
Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:462–6.Search in Google Scholar
Collett AR. Current concepts on functional appliances and mandibular growth stimulation. Aust Dent J 2000;45: 173–8.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanji Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:128–37.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:234–43.Search in Google Scholar
Tulloch JFC, Proffit WR. Phillips C. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:657–67.Search in Google Scholar
Burkhardt DR, McNamara JA, Baccetti T. Maxillary molar distilization or mandibular enhancement. A cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and Herbst appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:108–16.Search in Google Scholar
Rana R, Becher MK. Class II correction using the bimetric distalizing arch. Semin Orthod 2000;6:106–18.Search in Google Scholar
Joseph AA, Butchart CJ. An evaluation of the pendulum distalizing appliance. Semin Orthod 2000;6:129–35.Search in Google Scholar
Kinzinger GSM, Fritz UB, Sander F-G, Diedrich PR. Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:8–23.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Profile changes in patients treated with and without extraction: assessments by lay people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:639–44.Search in Google Scholar
Boley JC, Pontier JP, Smith S, Fulbright M. Facial changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Angle Orthod 1998;68:539–46.Search in Google Scholar
Young TM, Smith RJ. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of changes during non-extraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:452–8.Search in Google Scholar
Drobocky OB, Smith RJ. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:220–30.Search in Google Scholar
Staggers JA. A comparison of results of second molar and first premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:430–6.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson DK, Smith RJ. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:162–7.Search in Google Scholar
Saelens NA, De Smit AA. Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:225–36.Search in Google Scholar
Bowman SJ, Johnston LE Jr. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 2000;70:3–10.Search in Google Scholar
Shearn BN, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower first and second premolar effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:351–61.Search in Google Scholar
Moseling KP, Woods MG. Lip curve changes in females with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment. Angle Orthod 2004;74:51–62.Search in Google Scholar
Zierhut E, Joondeph DR, Artun J, Little RM. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and non-extraction Class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2000;70:208–19.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR. The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:129–35.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:28–37.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Zaher AR. Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion after extraction and non-extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:18–27.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Hession TJ, Treder JE. Soft tissue profile changes from 5 to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:698–706.Search in Google Scholar
Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod 1981;51: 115–50.Search in Google Scholar
Foley TF, Duncan PG. Soft tissue profile changes in late adolescent males. Angle Orthod 1997;67:373–80.Search in Google Scholar
Talass MF, Talass L, Baker RC. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:385–94.Search in Google Scholar
Lo FD, Hunter WS. Changes in nasolabial angle related to maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 1982;82:384–91.Search in Google Scholar
Waldman BH. Change in lip contour with maxillary incisor retraction. Angle Orthod 1982;52:129–34.Search in Google Scholar
Lai J, Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Effect of orthodontic therapy on the facial profile in long and short vertical facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:505–13.Search in Google Scholar
Yogosawa F. Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1990;60: 199–206.Search in Google Scholar
Hershey HG. Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in postadolescent female patients. Am J Orthod 1972;61:45–54.Search in Google Scholar
Roos N. Soft-tissue profile changes in Class II treatment. Am J Orthod 1977;72:165–75.Search in Google Scholar
Oliver BM. The influence of lip thickness and strain on upper lip response to incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 1982; 82:141–9.Search in Google Scholar
Wisth PJ. Soft tissue response to upper incisor retraction. Br J Orthod 1974;1:199–204.Search in Google Scholar
Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53:262–84.Search in Google Scholar
Rains MD, Nanda R. Soft-tissue changes associated with maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 1982;81:481–8.Search in Google Scholar
