This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Zierhut EC, Joondeph DR, Artun J, Little RM. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 208–19.Search in Google Scholar
Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 1968; 54: 272–89.Search in Google Scholar
Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila SK, Goorhuis J. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod 1990; 60: 177–90.Search in Google Scholar
Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 104: 180–7.Search in Google Scholar
Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983; 84: 1–28.Search in Google Scholar
Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 279–93.Search in Google Scholar
Gianelly AA. Leeway space and the resolution of crowding in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod 1995; 1: 188–94.Search in Google Scholar
Woods MG. Mandibular arch dimensional and positional changes in late mixed-dentition Class I and II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122: 180–8.Search in Google Scholar
Stromboni Y. Facial aesthetics in orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. Eur J Orthod 1979; 1: 201–6.Search in Google Scholar
Rains MD, Nanda R. Soft-tissue changes associated with maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 481–8.Search in Google Scholar
Blanchette ME, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Ghosh J, Nanda SK. A longitudinal cephalometric study of the soft tissue profile of short- and long-face syndromes from 7–17 years. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109: 116–31.Search in Google Scholar
Lai J, Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Effects of orthodontic therapy on the facial profile in long and short vertical facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 505–13.Search in Google Scholar
Woods MG. Overbite correction and sagittal changes: late mixed-dentition treatment effects. Aust Orthod J 2001; 17: 69–80.Search in Google Scholar
Bowman SJ, Johnston LE. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 3–10.Search in Google Scholar
DiBiase AT, Sandler PJ. Does orthodontics damage faces? Dent Update. 2001; 28: 98–104.Search in Google Scholar
Kocadereli I. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122: 67–72.Search in Google Scholar
Wholley CJ, Woods MG. The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 386–95.Search in Google Scholar
Moseling KP, Woods MG. Lip curve changes in females with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 51–62.Search in Google Scholar
Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LEJ. The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in “clear-cut” extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod 1993; 63: 257–72.Search in Google Scholar
Cusimano C, McLaughlin RP, Zernik JH. Effects of first bicuspid extractions on facial height in high-angle cases. J Clin Orthod 1993; 27: 594–8.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 28–37.Search in Google Scholar
Shearn BN, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower first and second premolar extraction effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 351–61.Search in Google Scholar
Ong HB, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects. Angle Orthod 2001; 71: 90–102.Search in Google Scholar
James RD. A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114: 265–76.Search in Google Scholar
Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 462–6.Search in Google Scholar
Burstone CJ. Integumental contour and extension patterns. Angle Orthod 1959; 29: 93–104.Search in Google Scholar
Subtelny JD. The soft tissue profile, growth and treatment changes. Angle Orthod 1961; 31: 105–22.Search in Google Scholar
Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1966; 52: 804–22.Search in Google Scholar
De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preferences. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 67–73.Search in Google Scholar
Rudee DA. Proportional profile changes concurrent with orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod 1964; 50: 421–34.Search in Google Scholar
Hershey HG. Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in postadolescent female patients. Am J Orthod 1972; 61: 45–54.Search in Google Scholar
Wisth PJ. Soft tissue response to upper incisor retraction in boys. Br J Orthod 1974; 1: 199–204.Search in Google Scholar
Roos N. Soft-tissue profile changes in Class II treatment. Am J Orthod 1977; 72: 165–74.Search in Google Scholar
Talass MF, Talass L, Baker RC. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91: 385–94.Search in Google Scholar
Angelle PL. A cephalometric study of the soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1973: 267–80.Search in Google Scholar
Prahl-Andersen B, Ligthelm-Bakker AS, Wattel E, Nanda R. Adolescent growth changes in soft tissue profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 476–83.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Hession TJ, Treder JE. Soft tissue profile changes from 5 to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114: 698–706.Search in Google Scholar
Foley TF, Duncan PG. Soft tissue profile changes in late adolescent males. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 373–80.Search in Google Scholar
Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. The morphological and morphogenetic basis for craniofacial form and pattern. Angle Orthod 1971; 41: 161–88.Search in Google Scholar
Meng HP, Goorhuis J, Kapila S, Nanda RS. Growth changes in the nasal profile from 7 to 18 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94: 317–26.Search in Google Scholar
Sherman SL, Woods MG, Nanda RS, Currier GF. The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits Appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93: 429–36.Search in Google Scholar
Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Longitudinal growth changes in the sagittal relationship of the maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100: 79–90.Search in Google Scholar
Woods MG. Lower incisor changes on basal bone and in relation to the lower face: combined growth and treatment effects in the late mixed dentition. Aust Orthod J 2002; 18: 7–18.Search in Google Scholar
Bjork A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983; 5: 1–46.Search in Google Scholar
Brandt S, Safirstein GR. Different extractions for different malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1975; 68: 15–41.Search in Google Scholar
Yogosawa F. Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1990; 60: 199–206.Search in Google Scholar
Saxby PJ, Freer TJ. Dentoskeletal determinants of soft tissue morphology. Angle Orthod 1985; 55: 147–54.Search in Google Scholar
Kuyl MH, Verbeek RMH, Dermaut LR. The integumental profile: A reflection of the underlying skeletal configuration? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 106: 597–604.Search in Google Scholar
Ackerman JL, Proffit WR. Soft tissue limitation in orthodontics: treatment planning guidelines. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 327–36.Search in Google Scholar
