This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948; 34: 812–40.Search in Google Scholar
Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953; 39: 729–55.Search in Google Scholar
Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959; 29: 8–29.Search in Google Scholar
Tweed CH. Evolutionary trends in orthodontics, past, present, and future. Am J Orthod 1953; 39: 81–108.Search in Google Scholar
Tweed CH. The Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954; 24: 121–69.Search in Google Scholar
Ricketts RM. A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod 1960; 46: 330–57.Search in Google Scholar
Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1966; 52: 804–22.Search in Google Scholar
Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 239–53.Search in Google Scholar
Riedel RA. Esthetics and its relation to orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod 1950; 20: 168–78.Search in Google Scholar
Park YC, Burstone CJ. Soft-tissue profile – fallacies of hard-tissue standards in treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 90: 52–62.Search in Google Scholar
Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983; 84:1–28.Search in Google Scholar
Ricketts RM. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 351–70.Search in Google Scholar
Ricketts RM. Facial art, the divine proportion and the science of esthetics. In: Provocations and perceptions in cranio-facial orthopedics: Rocky Mountain Orthodontics; 1989; 149–202.Search in Google Scholar
Dunlap RA. The golden ratio and Fibonacci numbers. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pty. Ltd; 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Seghers MJ, Longacre JJ, De Stefano GA. The golden proportion and beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964; 34: 382–6.Search in Google Scholar
Kawakami S, Tsukada S, Hayashi H, Takada Y, Koubayashi S. Golden proportion for maxillofacial surgery in Orientals. Ann Plast Surg 1989; 23: 417–25.Search in Google Scholar
Levin EI. Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40: 244–52.Search in Google Scholar
Heymann HO. The artistry of conservative esthetic dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 115: 14–23.Search in Google Scholar
Shoemaker Jr WA, Nestor J. A time to recognize the science in the art of healing. Fla Dent J 1981; 52: 22–3, 46–7.Search in Google Scholar
Ricketts RM. Divine proportion in facial esthetics. Clin Plast Surg 1982; 9: 401–22.Search in Google Scholar
Shell TL, Woods MG. Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar Class II cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 365–73.Search in Google Scholar
Phillips C, Tulloch C, Dann C. Rating of facial attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992; 20: 214–20.Search in Google Scholar
Kerr WJS, O’Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990; 17: 299–304.Search in Google Scholar
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Colombo A, Tartaglia G. The relationship between facial 3-D morphometry and the perception of attractiveness in children. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1997;12: 145–52.Search in Google Scholar
Nakajima E, Yanagisawa M. The Japanese sense of beauty and facial proportions. I. The facial characteristics of people with malocclusion. Quintessence Int 1985; 16: 553–7.Search in Google Scholar
Baker BW, Woods MG. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2001; 16:108–20.Search in Google Scholar
Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of Facial Growth. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 242–51.Search in Google Scholar
Fechner GT. Various attempts to establish a basic form of beauty; experimental aesthetics, golden section and square. Translation of chapter XIV of Fechners Vorschule der Aesthetik. Translated by Niemann M, Quehl J and Hoge H. (1997). Empirical Studies of the Arts 1876; 15: 115–30.Search in Google Scholar