DDS, OdontD(Lund) Cert Comp, Orth (Sweden), FCDSHK, FHKAM(Dental Surgery), FDSRCS(Edin)(Hon), Professor of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University ofHong Kong
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Herbst E. Atlas und Grundriss der Zahnärtlichen Orthopädie, München: Lehmann Verlag, 1910: 311–15.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalo-metric investigation. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 423–42.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance - its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 1–20.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H, Hansen K. Mandibular anchorage in Herbst treatment. Eur J Orthod 1988; 10: 149–64.Search in Google Scholar
McNamara JA, Howe RP. Clinical management of the acrylic splint Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1988: 94: 142–9.Search in Google Scholar
Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II mal-occlusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 1–13.Search in Google Scholar
Tse ELK. A comparative study of the skeletal and dental effects of a modified Herbst and the traditional Herbst appliances in southern Chinese. A prospective cephalo-metric study. Master’s thesis, University of Hong Kong 1994: 149–254.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance. Sevilla: Editorial Aguiram, 1995: 7–20.Search in Google Scholar
Du X, Hägg U, Rabie ABM. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximum jumping of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24: 167–74.Search in Google Scholar
Wolf U. Effekte der Herbst appartur. Eine verglleichende studie zweier konstruktionsformen. Inaugural Thesis, University of Giessen, 1994: 1–123.Search in Google Scholar
Björk A. The face in profile. An anthropological x-ray investigation on Swedish children and conscripts. Svensk Tandläkare-Tidskrift, Berlingska Boktryckeriet - Lund, 1947: 40(5B): 180.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982; 82: 104–13.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J 1982; Suppl. 15: 189–96.Search in Google Scholar
Lau JWP, Hägg U. Cephalometric morphology of southern Chinese children with Class II Division 1 mal-occlusion. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 188–90.Search in Google Scholar
McNamara JA. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8 to 10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981; 51: 177–202.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 mal-occlusions: a comparative study in children. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 111–20.Search in Google Scholar
Richardson A. An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod 1966; 52: 637–51.Search in Google Scholar
Tng TTH, Chan TCK, Hägg U, Cooke MS. Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls. Eur J Orthod 1994; 16: 110–20.Search in Google Scholar
Wong GWK, So LLY, Hägg U. A comparative study of sagittal correction with the Herbst appliance in two different ethnic groups. Eur J Orthod 1997, 19: 195–204.Search in Google Scholar
Lau YW, Cooke MS, Hägg U. Comparative cephalometric errors for orthodontic and surgical patients. J Adult Orthodontics and Oral Surgery, 1995; 10: 119–26.Search in Google Scholar
Hägg U, Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1988; 10: 169–76.Search in Google Scholar
