This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Artun J, Garol JD, Little RM. Long-term stability of mandibular incisors following successful treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1996; 66: 229–38.Search in Google Scholar
Creekmore TD. Where teeth should be positioned in the face and jaws and how to get them there. J Clin Orthod 1997; 31: 586–608.Search in Google Scholar
Zachrisson BU. Important aspects of long-term stability. J Clin Orthod 1997; 31: 562–83.Search in Google Scholar
Davidovitch M, McInnis D, Lindauer SJ. The effects of lip bumper therapy in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 111: 52–8.Search in Google Scholar
Little RM, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: post-retention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97: 393–404.Search in Google Scholar
Fidler BC, Artun J, Joondeph DR, Little RM. Long-term stability of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at the end of active treatment. Am J Ortho Dentofac Orthop 1995; 107: 276–85.Search in Google Scholar
Blake M, Bibby K. Retention and stability: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 114: 299–306.Search in Google Scholar
Elms TN, Buschang PH, Alexander RG. Long-term stability of Class II division 1, non-extraction cervical facebow therapy: 1. Model Analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 109: 271–6.Search in Google Scholar
Kahl-Nieke B, Fischbach H, Schwarze CW. Treatment and post-retention changes in dental arch width dimensions: a long-term evaluation of influencing cofactors. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 109: 368–78.Search in Google Scholar
Little RM, Riedel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years post-retention. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;93:423–8.Search in Google Scholar
Kahl-Nieke B, Fischbach H, Schwarze CW. Post-retention crowding and incisor irregularity: a long-term follow-up evaluation of stability and replase. Br J Orthod 1995; 22: 249–57.Search in Google Scholar
Thompson JR. The individuality of the patient in facial skeletal growth. Part 2. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105: 117–27.Search in Google Scholar
Erskine RB. Space required for arch levelling. J Clin Orthod 1992; 26: 474–6.Search in Google Scholar
Woods MG. A reassessment of space requirements for lower arch levelling. J Clin Orthod 1986; 20: 770–8.Search in Google Scholar
Woods MG. The mechanics of lower incisor intrusion: experiments in non-growing baboons. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 93: 186–95.Search in Google Scholar
Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part I: Clinical and radiological evaluation. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 249–60.Search in Google Scholar
Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA, Clar E, Darendeliler A. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: The effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 261–70.Search in Google Scholar
Ruf S, Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 1997; 64: 271–6.Search in Google Scholar
Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Case report: modified use of the Jasper Jumper appliance in a skeletal Class II mixed dentition case requiring palatal expansion. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 277–82.Search in Google Scholar
Cope JB, Buschang PH, Cope DD, Parker J, Blackwood HO. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 113–22.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Zaher AR, Cummins DM, Jakobsen, JR. Effects of orthodontic treatment on the growth of individuals with Class II Division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 221–30.Search in Google Scholar
Hans MG, Kishiyama C, Parker SH, Wolf GR, Noachtar R. Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 265–76.Search in Google Scholar
Hubbard GW, Nanda RS, Currier GF. A cephalometric evaluation of non-extraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1994; 5: 359–70.Search in Google Scholar
De Baets J. Pseudo-Class I re-evaluation of traditional Class II treatment. J Clin Orthod 1997; 31: 624–48.Search in Google Scholar
Obijou C, Pancherz H. Herbst appliance treatment of Class II Division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 112: 287–91.Search in Google Scholar
Gianelly AA. A strategy for non-extraction Class II treatment. Semin Orthod 1998; 4: 26–32.Search in Google Scholar
Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the Twin Block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 114: 15–24.Search in Google Scholar
Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomised clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 111: 391–400.Search in Google Scholar
Tulloch JFC, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 111: 533–42.Search in Google Scholar
Kaplan RG. Mandibular third molars and post-retention crowding. Am J Orthod 1974; 66: 411–30.Search in Google Scholar
Livieratos FA, Johnston LE, Jnr. A comparison of one stage and two stage non-extraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 118–31.Search in Google Scholar
Woods MG. Overbite correction and sagittal changes: late mixed-dentition treatment effects. Aust Orthod J 2001; 17: 69–80.Search in Google Scholar
Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia 1996; WB Saunders, 160.Search in Google Scholar
Sherman SL, Woods MG, Nanda RS. Longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits Appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 93: 429–36.Search in Google Scholar
Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Longitudinal growth changes in the sagittal relationship of the maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 100: 79–90.Search in Google Scholar
Shearn BN, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower first and second premolar extraction effects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000; 117: 351–61.Search in Google Scholar
Ong HB, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects. Angle Orthod 2001; 71: 90–102.Search in Google Scholar
Vincent AM, West VC. Cephalometric landmark identification error. Aust Orthod J 1987; 10: 98–104.Search in Google Scholar
Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 585–99.Search in Google Scholar
Cooke AH, Sellke TA, BeGole EA. The variability and reliability of two maxillary and mandibular superimposition techniques. Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 106: 463–71.Search in Google Scholar
Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby: 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Bondemark L, Kurol J, Bernold M. Repelling magnets versus superelastic nickel titanium coils in simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 189–98.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Chada JM, Potter RB. Stability of interca-nine width, overbite and overjet correction. Am J Orthod 1973; 63: 588–95.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Vorheis B, Bayati P. Changes in dentofacial structures in untreated Class II Division 1 and normal subjects: a long term study. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 55–66.Search in Google Scholar
Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA Jnr, Hunter WS. An atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from the University School Growth Study, The University of Michigan. Ann Arbor 1974, Centre for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar
Gugino CF, Dus I. Unlocking orthodontic malocclusions: an interplay between form and function. Semin Orthod 1998; 4: 246–55.Search in Google Scholar
