A new bracket system: Control 21^™ Part II: Tooth movement

1 Goldschmied F. A new bracket system - Control 21™ Part 1. Aust Orthod J 2001; 17: 1–7. Search in Google Scholar

2 Matassa CG. Direct bonding metallic brackets: Where are they heading? Am. J Orthod 1990; 98: 552–60. Search in Google Scholar

3 Begg PR. Differential-force in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1956; 42:481–510. Search in Google Scholar

4 Roth RN. Treatment mechanics for the straight-wire appliance. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall Jr RL. eds, Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1994; 665–716. Search in Google Scholar

5 Lindquist JT. The Edgewise appliance. In: Graber TM, Swain BF, eds. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques 2nd ed, St Louis: Mosby, 1985; 565–639. Search in Google Scholar

6 Peterson L, Spencer R, Andreason GF. A comparison of frictional resistance of Nitinol and stainless steel wires in Edgewise brackets. Quint Internat 1982; 13: 563–71. Search in Google Scholar

7 Nichols J. Frictional forces in fixed orthodontic apppliances. Dent Pract (Trans BSSO) 1968; 18: 362–6. Search in Google Scholar

8 Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Effects of surface roughness on the coefficients of friction in model orthodontic systems. J. Biomech 1990; 23: 913–25. Search in Google Scholar

9 Articolo LC, Kusy RP. Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances. Am J Orthod 1999; 115: 39–51. Search in Google Scholar

10 Matassa CG. Weighing…Friction. The Orthodontic Materials Insider. 2001; 13: 1–8. Search in Google Scholar

11 Kusy RP, Whitley JQ, Prewitt MJ. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod 1991; 61: 293–302. Search in Google Scholar

12 Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics; derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for binding. Europ J Orthod 1999; 2: 199–208. Search in Google Scholar

13 Ogata RH, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG Jr, Sinha PK, Currier GF. Frictional resistances in stainless steel bracket-wire combinations with effects in vertical deflections. Am J Orthod 1996; 109: 535–42. Search in Google Scholar

14 Sims AP, Waters NE, Birnie DJ. A comparison of forces required to produce tooth movement ex vivo through three types of pre-adjusted brackets when subjected to determined tip or torque values. Br J Orthod 1994; 21: 367–73. Search in Google Scholar

15 Begg PR. Begg orthodontic theory and technique. WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia 1965; 236–83. Search in Google Scholar

16 Lee BW. The force requirements for tooth movement Part 1. Tipping and bodily movement. Aust Orthod J 1995; 13: 238–48. Search in Google Scholar

17 Lee BW. The force requirements for tooth movement Part 11. Uprighting and root torque. Aust Orthod J 1995; 14: 34–9. Search in Google Scholar

18 Kesling PC. Expanding the horizons of the Edgewise archwire slot. Am J Orthod 1988; 94: 26–37. Search in Google Scholar

19 Storey E, Smith R. Force in orthodontics and its relation to tooth movement. Aust J Dent. 1952; 56: 11–18. Search in Google Scholar

20 Storey E. The nature of tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1973; 63: 292–313. Search in Google Scholar

21 Articolo LC, Kusy RP. Influence of angulation on binding of orthodontic materials during sliding. J Dent Research. 1997; 76: 197 (Abstract). Search in Google Scholar

22 Kusy RP. Orthodontic biomechanics: Vistas from the top of a new century. Am. J.Orthod 2000; 117: 589-91. Search in Google Scholar

23 Lee BW. Optimal tooth movement in orthodontics with special reference to the Begg technique. Jpn Begg J Orthod 1992; 3: 1–12. Search in Google Scholar