This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Angle EH. The treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. 7th ed. Philadelphia: SS White;1907: 64.Search in Google Scholar
Witzig JW, Spahl TJ. The clinical management of basic maxillofacial orthopedic appliances. In: Mechanics. Vol.1, Littleton, Mass.: PSG Publishing;1987:10–3.Search in Google Scholar
Stoner CC. An interview: AAFO’s man of the year 1984, Dr John W. Witzig. Funct Orthod 1984; 1(4): 9–15.Search in Google Scholar
Broadbent JM. Facing malocclusion: achieving harmony and balance. Dent Today 1990; 9(6): 41–5.Search in Google Scholar
Bowbeer GR. Saving the face and the TMJ: part 2. Funct Orthod 1986; 3(2): 9–13, 15, 17.Search in Google Scholar
Bowbeer GR. The sixth key to facial beauty and TMJ health. Funct Orthod 1987; 4(4): 4–20.Search in Google Scholar
Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 462–6.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jacobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes to Class II division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 28–37.Search in Google Scholar
Gianelly AA. Extraction versus nonextraction. In: Bolender CJ, Bounoure GM, Barat Y, eds. Extraction versus nonextraction. Paris: SID Publisher; 1995: 173–84.Search in Google Scholar
Drobocky OB, Smith RJ. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 95: 220–30.Search in Google Scholar
Bravo LA. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 31–42.Search in Google Scholar
Young, T, Smith, R. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of change during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 103: 452–8.Search in Google Scholar
Rushing, SE, Silberman, SL, Meydrech, EF, Tuncay, OC. How dentists perceive the effects of orthodontic extraction on facial appearance. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 769–72.Search in Google Scholar
Kerns, LL, Silveira, AM, Kerns, DG, Regennitter, FJ. Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Aesthetic Dent 1997; 9: 76–85.Search in Google Scholar
Lines, P, Lines, R, Lines, C. Profilemetrics and facial aesthetics. Am J Orthod 1978; 73: 648–57.Search in Google Scholar
Prahl-Anderson, B, Boersma, H, Van der Linden, FPGM, Moore, AW. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 98: 209–12.Search in Google Scholar
Kerr, WJS, O’Donnell, JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990; 17: 299–304.Search in Google Scholar
Peck, S and Peck, L. Selected aspects of the art and science of facial aesthetics. Semin Orthod 1995; 1: 105–26.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, DK and Smith, RJ. Smile aesthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 162–7.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara, SE and Jakobsen, JR. Profile changes in patients treated with and without extractions: Assessments by lay people. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 112: 639–44.Search in Google Scholar
Cochrane, SM, Cunningham, SJ, Hunt, NP. Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public. J Clin Orthod 1997; 31: 164–68.Search in Google Scholar
Oynick, CA. The impact of orthodontic treatment on perceived facial aesthetics. [Master’s thesis] St. Louis: St. Louis University, 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Bowman, SJ, Johnston, LE, Jr. The aesthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 3–10.Search in Google Scholar
Paquette, DE, Beattie, JR, Johnston, LE, Jr. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in “borderline” Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 102: 1–14.Search in Google Scholar
Luppanapornlarp, S, Johnston, LE, Jr. The effects of premolar-extraction treatment: A long-term comparison of outcomes in “clear-cut” extraction and nonextraction patients. Angle Orthod 1993; 63: 257–72.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, LE, Jr., Paquette, DE, Beattie, JR, Cassidy, DW, McCray, JF, Killiany, DM. The reduction of susceptibility bias in retrospective comparisions of alternative treatment strategies. In: Vig, KD and Vig, PS, eds. Clinical research as the basis of clinical practice. Craniofacial Growth Series 25. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1991: 155–77.Search in Google Scholar
Beattie, JR, Paquette, DE, Johnston, LE, Jr. The functional impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments: a long-term comparison in patients with “borderline,” equally susceptible class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105: 444–9.Search in Google Scholar
James, RD. A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and non-extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 114: 265–76.Search in Google Scholar
Scott, SH, and Johnston, LE, Jr. The aesthetic impact of extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment on matched samples of African American patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999; 116: 352–8.Search in Google Scholar
Hagler, BL. Long-term comparison of extraction and nonextraction treatments in equally susceptible African-American patients. [Master’s thesis] University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Caplan, MJ, Shivapuja, PK. The effect of premolar extractions on the soft-tissue profile in adult African American females. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 129–36.Search in Google Scholar
Boley, JC. Extraction versus nonextraction: has the pendulum swung too far? [Summary of presentation to the Southern Region P.C.S.O. meeting June, 1991, Los Angeles, California] Pac Co Soc Orthod Bull, 1991; 63: 58–9.Search in Google Scholar
Boley, JC. Face quiz study. Presented to the Southern Component of the Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists (June 14) and the National meeting of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists (August 14), 1991.Search in Google Scholar
Boley, JC. Face quiz study. Presented to the 92nd Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists, St. Louis, Missiouri, (May 11), 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Rossouw, PE. A longitudinal study of the stability of the dentition following orthodontic treatment. [PhD Dissertation] University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa, 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Sandusky, WC. A long term postretention study of Tweed extraction treatment. [Master’s thesis] University of Tennessee, Memphis, 1983.Search in Google Scholar
Franklin, GS, Rossouw, PE, Woodside, DG. A longitudinal study of dental and skeletal parameters associated with stability of orthodontic treatment. Am J Ortho Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 452–3.Search in Google Scholar
Little, RM, Wallen, TR, Reidel, RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by conventional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 349–65.Search in Google Scholar
Dierkes, JM. The beauty of the face: An orthodontic perspective. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 89(special issue): 89-95E.Search in Google Scholar
Hulsey, CM. An aesthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 132–44.Search in Google Scholar
Rigsbee, OH III, Sperry, TP, BeGole, EA. The influence of facial animation on smile characteristics. Int J Adult Orthod Orthogn Surg 1988; 3: 233–9.Search in Google Scholar
Gianelly, AA, Arena, SA, Bernstein, L. A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the lightwire, edgewise, and Fränkel appliances. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 269–76.Search in Google Scholar
Adenwalla, ST, Kronman, JA. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and edgewise appliance: A comparative study of mandibular growth and facial aesthetics. Angle Orthod 1985; 55: 281–98.Search in Google Scholar
Righellis, EG. Treatment effects of Fränkel, activator, and extraoral traction appliances. Angle Orthod 1983; 53: 107–21.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, LE, Jr. A comparative analysis of Class II treatment methods. In: McNamara, JA Jr, Carlson, DS, Vig, PS, Ribbens, KA, eds. Science and clinical judgement in orthodontics. Craniofacial Growth Series 19. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1986: 103–48.Search in Google Scholar
Livieratos, FA and Johnston, LE, Jr. A comparision of one-stage and two-stage nonextraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 118–31.Search in Google Scholar
Ghafari, JG. Comparisons of extraoral traction and functional appliance therapy. Presentation to the 97th Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists, Philadelphia, 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Little, RM, Riedel, RA, Stein, A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: Postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97: 393–404.Search in Google Scholar
Schwarze, CW. Expansion and relapse in long term follow-up studies. Trans Europ Orthod Soc 1972 :275–284.Search in Google Scholar
Dale, JG. Interceptive guidance of occlusion with emphasis on diagnosis. In: Graber, TM, Vanarsdall, RL, eds. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby, 1994: 291–377.Search in Google Scholar
Lutz, HD, Poulton, DR. Stability of dental arch expansion in the deciduous dentition. Angle Orthod 1985; 55: 299-315.Search in Google Scholar
Bruno, EC. Evaluation of post-retention mandibular arch dimensions following expansion in the deciduous or early mixed dentition. [Master’s thesis] San Francisco: University of the Pacific, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara, SE, Chadha, JM, Potter, RB. Stability of intercanine width, overbite, and overjet correction. Am J Orthod 1973; 63: 588–95.Search in Google Scholar
Shapiro, PA. Mandibular dental arch form and dimension. Am J Orthod 1974; 66: 58–70.Search in Google Scholar
Kuftinec, MM. Effect of edgewise treatment and retention on mandibular incisors. Am J Orthod 1975; 68: 316–22.Search in Google Scholar
El-Mangoury, NH. Orthodontic relapse in subjects with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasia. Am J Orthod 1979; 75: 548–61.Search in Google Scholar
Sondhi, A, Cleall, JF, Begole, EA. Dimensional changes in the arches of orthodontically treated cases. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 60–74.Search in Google Scholar
Uhde, MD, Sadowsky, C, Begole, EA. Long term stability of dental relationships after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1983;53:240–52.Search in Google Scholar
Glenn, G, Sinclair, PM, Alexander, RG. Non-extraction orthodontic therapy: Post-treatment dental and skeletal stability. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 92: 321–8.Search in Google Scholar
Geran, RE. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition [Master’s thesis] Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Burke, SP, Silveira, AM, Goldsmith, LJ, Yancey, JM, Stewart, AV, Scarfe, WC. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Angle Orthod 1997; 68: 53–60.Search in Google Scholar
Proffit, WR, Ackerman, JL. Orthodontic treatment planning: From problem list to specific plan. In: Proffit, WR, Fields, HW, eds. Contemporary Orthodontics, St. Louis: Mosby, 1993; 186–224.Search in Google Scholar
Årtun, J, Krogstad, O. Periodontal status of mandibular incisors following excessive proclination. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 91: 255–332.Search in Google Scholar
Dorfman, HS. Mucogingival changes resulting from mandibular incisor tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1978; 74: 286–97.Search in Google Scholar
Wennström, JL. Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1996; 2: 46–52.Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, CG, Pearson, JK, Ainamo, J. Changes of the marginal periodontum as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. J Periodontol 1981; 52: 314–20.Search in Google Scholar
Andlin-Sobocki, A, Bodin, L. Dimensional alterations of the gingiva related to changes of facial/lingual tooth position in permanent anterior teeth of children. A 2-year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol 1993; 20: 219–24.Search in Google Scholar
Little, RM. Orthodontic stability and relapse. [Summary of presentation to annual session, November 13, 1990, Phoenix, Arizona] Pac Coast Soc Orthod Bull 1991; 63: 35–8.Search in Google Scholar
Dugoni, SA, Lee, JS, Varela, J, Dugoni, AA. Early mixed dentition treatment: Postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1995; 65: 311–20.Search in Google Scholar
Arnold, S. Analysis of leeway space in the mixed dentition. [Master’s thesis] Boston: Boston University, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
Gianelly, AA. Crowding: timing of treatment. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 415–7.Search in Google Scholar
Gianelly, AA. Leeway space and the resolution of crowding in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod 1995; 1: 118–94.Search in Google Scholar
Gianelly, AA. One-phase versus two-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 556–9.Search in Google Scholar
White, LW. JCO Interviews: Dr. Anthony Gianelly on current issues in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1996; 30: 439–46.Search in Google Scholar
Bowman, S.J. One-stage versus two-stage treatment: Are two really necessary? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 111–6.Search in Google Scholar
Proffit, WR. Forty-year review review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 407–14.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, LE, Jr. Let them eat cake: The struggle between form and substance in orthodontic clinical investigation. Clin Orthod Res. 1998; 1: 88–93.Search in Google Scholar
Sadowsky, C. The risk of orthodontic treatment for producing temporomandibular disorders: A literature overview. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 79–83.Search in Google Scholar
Greene, CS. Etiology of temporomandibular disorders. Semin Orthod 1995; 1: 222–8.Search in Google Scholar
McNamara, JA, Jr., Seligman, DA, Okeson, JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: A review. J Orofac Pain 1995; 9: 73–90.Search in Google Scholar
Luecke, PE, Johnston, LE Jr. The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: Testing the central dogma of “functional orthodontics.” Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 4–12.Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, G. Editorial: Evidence-based orthodontics, Pac Coast Soc Orthod 1997; 69: 11–12.Search in Google Scholar
Peck, S. Editorial: “Philosophy” and evidence-based orthodontics. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 403.Search in Google Scholar
Raphael, K., Marbach, J.J. Evidence-based care of musculoskeletal facial pain: Implications for the clinical science of dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 73–9.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, L.E., Jr. A long-term comparison of extraction and nonextraction Class II therapy. Presentation at: 96th Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists; May 11, 1992; St. Louis, Missouri.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, L.E., Jr. The value of information and the cost of uncertainty: Who pays the bill? OERF Newsletter 1998: 37; 7–15.Search in Google Scholar
