Age changes in orthodontic treatment need: a longitudinal study of 10- and 13-year-old children, using the Dental Aesthetic Index

1 Tang ELK, Wei HY. Recording and measuring malocclusion: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 103: 344–51. Search in Google Scholar

2 Jago JD. The epidemiology of dental occlusion; a critical appraisal. J Pub Health Dent 1974; 34: 80–93. Search in Google Scholar

3 Cons N, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: The Dental Aesthetic Index. College of Dentistry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City. 1986. Search in Google Scholar

4 Richmond S, Shaw WC, Stephens CD, Webb WG, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Orthodontics in the General Dental Service of England and Wales: a critical assessment of standards. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 315–29. Search in Google Scholar

5 Oteyumi OD, Noar JH. A comparison between the DAI and SCAN in estimating orthodontic treatment need. Int Dent J 1996; 46: 35–40. Search in Google Scholar

6 Keay P, Freer T, Basford K. Orthodontic treatment need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Aust Orthod J 1993; 13: 4–7. Search in Google Scholar

7 Jenny J, Cons NC. Comparing and contrasting two orthodontic indices, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 110: 410–16. Search in Google Scholar

8 Johnson M, Harkness M. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in 10-year-old New Zealand school children. Aust Orthod J 2000; 16: 1–8. Search in Google Scholar

9 Crowther P, Harkness M, Herbison P. Orthodontic treatment need in 10-year-old Dunedin school children. N Z Dent J 1997; 93: 72–8. Search in Google Scholar

10 Oteyumi OD, Jones SP. Methods of assessing and grading malocclusion: a review. Aust Orthod J 1995; 14: 21–7. Search in Google Scholar

11 Tarvit DJ, Freer TJ. Assessing malocclusion: the time factor. Br J Orthod 1998; 25: 31–4. Search in Google Scholar

12 Estioko LJ, Wright FAC, Morgan MV. Orthodontic treatment need of secondary school children in Heidelberg, Victoria: an epidemiological study using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Com Dent Health 1994; 11: 147–51. Search in Google Scholar

13 Johnson M, Harkness M, Crowther P, Herbison P. A comparison of two methods of assessing orthodontic treatment need in the mixed dentition: DAI and IOTN. Aust Orthod J 2000; 16: 82–7. Search in Google Scholar

14 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8: 307–10. Search in Google Scholar

15 Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ, Jakobsen J. Predicting handicapping malocclusion using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). Int Dent J 1993; 43: 128–32. Search in Google Scholar

16 Chi J Y, Harkness EM, Crowther P. A longitudinal study of orthodontic treatment need in Dunedin schoolchildren. N Z Dent J 2000; 96:4–9. Search in Google Scholar

17 Jenny J, Cons NC. Establishing malocclusion severity levels on the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale. Aust Dent J 1995; 41: 43–6. Search in Google Scholar

18 Freer TJ. Assessment of occlusal status: the matched-pair similarity technic. Int Dent J 1972; 22: 412–22. Search in Google Scholar

19 Björk A. Variability and age changes in overjet and over-bite. Am J Orthod 1953; 39: 779–801. Search in Google Scholar

20 Oteyumi D, Ogunyinka A, Dosumu O. et al. Perceptions of dental aesthetics in the United States and Nigeria. Com Dent Oral Epid 1998; 26: 418–20. Search in Google Scholar

21 Shaw WC, Lewis HG, Robertson NRE. Perception of malocclusion. Br Dent J 1975; 138: 211–16. Search in Google Scholar