This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Pickering EA, Vig P. The occlusal index used to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1975; 2(1): 47–51.Search in Google Scholar
Berg R, Fredlund A. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment results. Eur J Orthod 1981; 3: 181–5.Search in Google Scholar
Elderton RJ, Clark JD. Orthodontic treatment in the General Dental Service assessed by the occlusal index. Br J Orthod 1983; 10: 178–86.Search in Google Scholar
Elderton RJ, Clark JD. An investigation of treatment in the general dental service for patients with Class II division I malocclusions. Br J Orthod 1984; 11: 2–8.Search in Google Scholar
Richmond S, Shaw WC, Stephens CD, Webb WG, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Orthodontics in the General Dental Service of England and Wales: a critical assessment of standards. Br Dent J 1993; 124: 315–29.Search in Google Scholar
Richmond S, Andrews M. Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway. Eur J Orthod 1993; 15: 7–15.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 23–35.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien KD, Robbins R, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Shnorhokian H, Weyant R. The effectiveness of Class II division 1 treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 107: 329–34.Search in Google Scholar
Fox NA, Richmond S, Wright JL, Daniels CP. Factors affecting the outcome of orthodontic treatment within the General Dental Service. Br J Orthod 1997; 24: 217–21.Search in Google Scholar
Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvements and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 180–7.Search in Google Scholar
Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, Jones R, Stephens CD, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating):reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14:125–39.Search in Google Scholar
DeGuzman L, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Weyant R J, O’Brien K. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 107: 172–6.Search in Google Scholar
Vig PS, Weintraub JA, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: a pilot study of five selected practices. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97: 45–51.Search in Google Scholar
Fink DF, Smith RJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102: 45–51.Search in Google Scholar
Amditis C, Smith LF. The duration of fixed orthodontic treatment: a comparison of two groups of patients treated using Edgewise brackets with 0.018” and 0.022” slots. Aust Orthod J 2000;16(1): 34–9.Search in Google Scholar
Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley. New York, 1981Search in Google Scholar
Kerr WJS, McColl JH. Use of the PAR index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 351–7.Search in Google Scholar
Kerr WJS, McColl JH, Fristick L. The use of removable orthodontic appliances in the General Dental Service. Br Dent J 1996; 181: 18–22.Search in Google Scholar
Birkeland K, Furevik J, Egil Boe O, Wisth PJ. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR index. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19: 279–88.Search in Google Scholar
Robb SI, Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA. Effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment in adults and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 383–6.Search in Google Scholar
Kelly BM, Springate SD. Specialist orthodontics in the General Dental Service. Br Dent J 1996; 180: 209–15.Search in Google Scholar
Lin WL. A cephalometric appraisal of Chinese adults having normal occlusion and excellent facial types. J Osaka Dent University 1985; 19(1): 1–32.Search in Google Scholar
Cooke MS, Wei SHY. Cephalometric standards for the southern Chinese. Eur J Orthod 1988; 10: 264–72.Search in Google Scholar
