A comparison of two methods of assessing orthodontic treatment need in the mixed dentition: DAI and IOTN

1 Crowther P, Harkness M, Herbison P. Orthodontic treatment need in 10-year-old Dunedin schoolchildren. N Z Dent J 1997; 93: 72–8. Search in Google Scholar

2 Johnson M, Harkness M. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in 10-year-old New Zealand children. Aust Orthod J 2000; 16: 1–8. Search in Google Scholar

3 Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11: 309–20. Search in Google Scholar

4 Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: The Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa City: University of Iowa, 1986: 93–102. Search in Google Scholar

5 Keay PA, Freer TJ, Basford KE. Orthodontic treatment need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Aust Orthod J 1994; 13: 4–7. Search in Google Scholar

6 Jenny J, Cons NC. Comparing and contrasting two orthodontic indices, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 410–16. Search in Google Scholar

7 Evans R, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 1987; 9: 314–18. Search in Google Scholar

8 Burden DJ, Holmes A. The need for orthodontic treatment in the child population of the United Kingdom. Eur J Orthod 1994; 16: 395–9. Search in Google Scholar

9 Freer TJ. Need for reappraisal of the uses of indices. Aust Orthod J 1996; 14: 110. Search in Google Scholar

10 Holmes A, Willmot DR. The Consultant Orthodontists Group 1994 survey of the use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Br J Orthod 1996; 23: 57–9. Search in Google Scholar

11 Solow B. Guest Editorial: orthodontic screening and third party financing. Eur J Orthod 1995; 17: 79–83. Search in Google Scholar

12 Plunkett DJ. The provision of orthodontic treatment: some ethical considerations. N Z Dent J 1997; 93: 17–20. Search in Google Scholar

13 Estioko LJ, Wright FAC, Morgan MV. Orthodontic treatment need of secondary schoolchildren in Heidelberg, Victoria: an epidemiological study using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Community Dent Health 1994; 11: 147–51. Search in Google Scholar

14 Otuyemi OD, Noar JH. A comparison between DAI and SCAN in estimating orthodontic treatment need. Int Dent J 1996; 46: 35–40. Search in Google Scholar

15 Richmond S, Burden DJ, Buchanan IB, Turbill EA. Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Basic Introductory Course in the Use of Occlusal Indices. Manchester: University Dental Hospital of Manchester, 1992; 1–32. Search in Google Scholar

16 Jenny J, Cons NC. Establishing malocclusion severity levels on the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale. Aust Dent J 1996; 41: 43–6. Search in Google Scholar

17 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–74. Search in Google Scholar

18 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; February 8: 307–10. Search in Google Scholar

19 Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: a personal history. Int J Epidemiol 1995; 24: S7–S14. Search in Google Scholar

20 Ansai T, Miyazaki H, Katoh Y, et al. Prevalence of mal-occlusion in high school students in Japan according to the Dental Aesthetic Index. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 303–5. Search in Google Scholar

21 Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ, Jakobsen J. Predicting handicapping malocclusion using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). Int Dent J 1993; 43: 128–32. Search in Google Scholar