Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces

1 McKiernan Em, McKiernan F, Jones ML. Psychological profiles and motives of adults seeking orthodontic treatment. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1992; 7: 187-98. Search in Google Scholar

2 Salonen L, Mohhn B, Gotzlinger B, Hellden L. Need and demand for orthodontic treatment in an adult Swedish population. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 359-68. Search in Google Scholar

3 Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. 1990 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part l: Results and trend. J Clin Orthod 1991; 25: 145-56. Search in Google Scholar

4 Barnard PD. National Oral Health Survey Australia 1987-88: Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services, 1993: 46-7. Search in Google Scholar

5 Downer MC. Changing trends in dental caries experience in Great Britain. Adv Dent Res 1993; 7: 19-24. Search in Google Scholar

6 Downer MC. The 1993 national survey of children’s dental health: a commentary on the preliminary report. Br Dent J 1994; 176: 209-14. Search in Google Scholar

7 Nattrass C, Sandy JR Adult Orthodontics a review. Brit J Orthod 1995; 22: 331-7 Search in Google Scholar

8 Ravn JJ. Dental injuries in Copenhagen school children, school years 1967-72. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1974; 2: 231-45. Search in Google Scholar

9 Garcia-Godoy F, Sanchez JR, Sanchez RE Proclination of teeth and its relationship with traumatic injuries in preschool and school children. J Pedod 1982; 6: 114-9. Search in Google Scholar

10 Dearing SG. Overbite, overjet, lip-drape and incisor tooth fracture in children. N Z Dent J 1984; 80: 50-2. Search in Google Scholar

11 Newman SM, Dressier KB, Grenadier MR. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to esthetic restorative materials using a silane. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 503-6. Search in Google Scholar

12 Kao EC, Elisades T, Rezvan E, Johnston WM. Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite laminate veneers. Eur J Orthod 1995; 17: 533-40. Search in Google Scholar

13 Schwartz RE, Tyas MJ, West VC. The bonding of orthodontic brackets to composite resin surfaces. Current note No. 71. Aust Dent J 1990; 35: 472-3. Search in Google Scholar

14 Chunhacheevachaloke E, Tyas MJ. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to composite resin surfaces. Aust J Orthod 1997; 15: 10-15. Search in Google Scholar

15 Lopez JI. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 669-78. Search in Google Scholar

16 Wright WL, Powers JM. In vitro tensile bond strength of reconditioned brackets. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 247-52. Search in Google Scholar

17 Eliades T, Viazis AD, Eliades G. Bonding of ceramic brackets to enamel: morphologic and structural considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 99: 369-75. Search in Google Scholar

18 Burger KM, Cooley RL, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of thermocycling times on dentin bond strength. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4: 197-8. Search in Google Scholar

19 Akin Nergiz N, Nergiz I, Behlfelt K, Placer U. Shear bond strength of a new polycarbonate bracket: an in vitro study with 14 adhesives. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18: 295-301. Search in Google Scholar

20 Carty G, Tyas MJ. Shear bond strength of a mechanically retained ceramic bracket. Aust Orthod J 1993; 13: 13-18. Search in Google Scholar

21 Reynolds I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975; 2: 171-8. Search in Google Scholar

22 Maijer R, Smith DC. A new surface treatment for bonding J Biomed Mater Res 1979; 13: 975-85. Search in Google Scholar

23 Reynolds IR, von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding in orthodontics: a comparison of attachments. Br J Orthod 1977; 4: 65-9. Search in Google Scholar

24 Dickinson PT, Powers JM. Evaluation of fourteen directbonding orthodontic bases. Am J Orthod 1980; 78: 30-9. Search in Google Scholar

25 Buzzitta VAJ, Hallgren SE, Powers JM. Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 87-92. Search in Google Scholar

26 Wang WN, Meng CL. A study of bond strength between light- and self-cured orthodontic resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101: 350-4. Search in Google Scholar

27 Smith RT, Shivapuja PK. The evaluation of dual cement resins in orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 103: 448-51. Search in Google Scholar

28 Aasrum E, Ng’ang’a PM, Dahm S, Ogaard B. Tensile bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a fluoride-releasing light-curing adhesive: an in vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 104: 48-50. Search in Google Scholar

29 Chamda RA, Stein E. Time-related bond strengths of light-cured and chemically cured bonding systems: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 110: 378-82. Search in Google Scholar

30 Newman GV Current status of bonding attachments. J Clin Orthod 1973; 7: 425-34. Search in Google Scholar

31 de Pulido LG, Powers JM. Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-plastic bracket systems in vitro. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 124-30. Search in Google Scholar

32 Britton JC, McInnes P, Weinberg R, Ledoux WR, Retief DH. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98: 348-53. Search in Google Scholar

33 Feldner JC, Sarkar NK, Sheridan JJ, Lancaster DM. In vitro torque-deformation characteristics of orthodontic polycarbonate brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 106: 265-72. Search in Google Scholar

34 Sinha PK, Nanda RS. Esthetic orthodontic appliances and bonding concerns for adults. Dent Clin Nth Am 1997; 41: 89-109. Search in Google Scholar

35 Bazakidou E, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG, Sinha PK. Evaluation of frictional resistance in esthetic brackets. Am J Otthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 112: 138-44. Search in Google Scholar

36 Klockowski R, Davis EL, Joynt RE, Wieczkowski G, McDonald A. Bond strength and durability of glass ionomer cements used as bonding agents in the placement of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 96: 60-4. Search in Google Scholar

37 Millett DT, McCabe JE Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cement: a review. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18: 385-99. Search in Google Scholar

38 Newman GV, Sun BC, Ozsoylu SA, Newman RA. Update on bonding brackets: an in vitro survey. J Clin Orthod 1994; 28: 396-402. Search in Google Scholar

39 Fox NA, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. Bond strengths of orthodontic bonding materials: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1991; 18: 125-30. Search in Google Scholar

40 Mitchell L. An investigation into the effect of a fluoride releasing adhesive on the prevalence of enamel surface changes associated with directly bonded orthodontic attachments. Br J Orthod 1992; 19: 207-14. Search in Google Scholar

41 Mitchell CA, O’Hagan E, Walker JM. Probability of failure of orthodontic brackets bonded with different cementingagents. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 317-22. Search in Google Scholar

42 Millett D, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 117-22. Search in Google Scholar

43 Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994; 21: 33-43. Search in Google Scholar

44 Miller JR. Commentary: Basic concepts concerning bracket failure research. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 167-8. Search in Google Scholar

45 Winchester LJ. Bond strength of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13: 293-305. Search in Google Scholar