<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

Non-extraction treatment was carried out for a growing Angle Class II division 1 patient. Because the patient demonstrated potential growth and all the third molars were congenitally missing, the extraction of the four premolars was ruled out.
A functional appliance (MGA) and cervical headgear were employed simultaneously in the first phase of treatment. The second phase was carried out by mechanotherapy.
As a result, adequate forward growth of the mandible was attained and all 28 teeth were kept in good relation with no root resorption and healthy periodontal tissue. A better improvement of the profile may have been attained had extraction treatment been performed; with non-extraction treatment, however, the amount of tooth movement could he minimized, and root resorption was not observed. The role of the functional appliance is also important for the success of non-extraction treatment in Class II patients.
</abstract>

Non-extraction treatment was carried out for a growing Angle Class II division 1 patient. Because the patient demonstrated potential growth and all the third molars were congenitally missing, the extraction of the four premolars was ruled out.
A functional appliance (MGA) and cervical headgear were employed simultaneously in the first phase of treatment. The second phase was carried out by mechanotherapy.
As a result, adequate forward growth of the mandible was attained and all 28 teeth were kept in good relation with no root resorption and healthy periodontal tissue. A better improvement of the profile may have been attained had extraction treatment been performed; with non-extraction treatment, however, the amount of tooth movement could he minimized, and root resorption was not observed. The role of the functional appliance is also important for the success of non-extraction treatment in Class II patients.

Case Report: Non-Extraction Treatment with Functional and Mechanical Therapy of a Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Kyushu University, Faculty of Dentistry Fukuoka

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Non-extraction treatment was carried out for a growing Angle Class II division 1 patient. Because the patient demonstrated potential growth and all the third...

Case Report: Non-Extraction Treatment with Functional and Mechanical Therapy of a Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Pubblicato online: 16 gen 2024

Pagine: 235 - 241

Ricevuto: 01 feb 1996

Accettato: 01 ago 1996

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1997-0004

Parole chiave
Non-extraction treatment, Class II malocclusion, functional and mechanical therapy

© 1997 Teruo Murakami et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Case Report: Non-Extraction Treatment with Functional and Mechanical Therapy of a Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Pubblicato online: 16 gen 2024

Pagine: 235 - 241

Ricevuto: 01 feb 1996

Accettato: 01 ago 1996

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1997-0004

Parole chiaveNon-extraction treatment, Class II malocclusion, functional and mechanical therapy

© 1997 Teruo Murakami et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Parole chiave
Non-extraction treatment, Class II malocclusion, functional and mechanical therapy