Bonding and Debonding with a Light-Activated Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement

1 Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853. Search in Google Scholar

2 Newman GV. Epoxy adhesive for orthodontic attachments: Progress report. Am J Orthod 1965; 51: 901-912. Search in Google Scholar

3 Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 93-93. Search in Google Scholar

4 Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralisation. Part 1 Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 94: 68-73. Search in Google Scholar

5 Zachrisson BU, Skogan O, Hoymyhr S. Enamel cracks and scratches in debonded, debanded and orthodontically untreated teeth. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 307-319. Search in Google Scholar

6 Farquhar RB. Direct bonding comparing a polyacrylic acid and a phosphoric acid technique. Am Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986; 90: 187-194. Search in Google Scholar

7 Wilson AP, Kent BE. The glassionomer cement: a new translucent filling material. J Appl Chem Biotech 1971; 21: 313. Search in Google Scholar

8 Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Clarke HE. Long term F release from glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 158-160. Search in Google Scholar

9 Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro. Swed Dent J 1991; 15: 252-258. Search in Google Scholar

10 Valk JWP, Davidson CI. The relevance of controlled fluoride release with bonded orthodontic appliances. J Dent 1987; 15: 25-60. Search in Google Scholar

11 McLean JW, Nicholson JW,Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quint Int 1994; 25: 587-589. Search in Google Scholar

12 Compton AM, Meyers CE, Hondrum SO, Lorton L. Comparison of shear bond strength of a light cured glass ionomer for use as an orthodontic bonding agent. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 138-144. Search in Google Scholar

13 Fricker JP. A twelve month clinical evaluation of a light activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105: 502-505. Search in Google Scholar

14 Mount GJ. Adhesion of glass-ionomer cements in the clinical environment. Op Dent 1991; 16: 141-148. Search in Google Scholar

15 Aboush YEY, Jenkins CBG. The effect of poly(acrylic) acid cleanser on the adhesion of a glass-ionomer cement to enamel and dentine. J Dent 1987; 15: 147-152. Search in Google Scholar

16 Mount GJ. Clinical placement of modern glass-ionomer cements. Quint Int 1993; 24: 99-107. Search in Google Scholar

17 Wilson AD. Resin modified glassionomer cements. Int J Pros 1990; 3: 425-429. Search in Google Scholar

18 Nicholson JW, McLean JW. A preliminary report on the effect of storage in water on the properties of commercial light cured glassionomer cements. Br Dent J 1992; 73: 98-101. Search in Google Scholar

19 Howell S, Weekes WT. An electron microscope evaluation of the enamel surface subsequent to various debonding procedures. Aus Dent J 1990; 35: 245-252. Search in Google Scholar

20 Fricker JP, Kameda A. The bond strength of a glass polyalkenoate cement to enamel and stainless steel. Aus Orthod 1990; 11: 161-163. Search in Google Scholar