[
ALEXANDER, R.G. (1966) The effects on tooth position and maxillo-facial vertical growth during scoliosis treatment with the Milwaukee brace. An initial study. Amer.J.Qrthodont. 52:161-189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ARMSTRONG, C.J. (1961) A clinical evaluation of the chin-cup. Preliminary Report. Aust.Dent.J. 6:338-346.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ARMSTRONG, C.J. (1963) Clinical evaluation of the chin-cup. Aust.Dent.J. 8:492-499.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BADELL, M.C. (1976) An evaluation of extra-oral combined high-pull traction and cervical traction to the maxilla Amer.J.Orthodont. 69:431-446.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BERNSTEIN, M. (1974) An approach to the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Amer.J.Orthodont. 66:172-188.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BERNSTEIN, M., ROSOL, M.L. & GIANELLY, A.A. (1976) A biometric study of orthopedically directed treatment of Class II malocclusion. Amer.J.Orthodont. 70:683-689.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BERNSTEIN, M., ULBRICH, R.W. & GIANELLY, A.A. (1977) Orthopedics versus orthodontics in Class II treatment: An implant study. Amer.J.Orthodont. 72:549-559.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BLOUNT, W.T. & CLARKE, G.R. (1949) Epiphyseal stapling. J.Bone & Joint Surg. 31A:464-478.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BLUEHER, W.A. (1959) Cephalometric analysis of treatment with cervical anchorage. Angle Orthodont. 29:45-53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRANDT, H.C., SHAPIRO, P.A. & KOKICH, V.G. (1979) Experimental and post-experimental effects of posteriorly directed extra-oral traction in adult Macaca fascicularis. Angle Orthodont. 75:301-317.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CUTLER, B.S., HASSIG, F.H. & TURPIN, D.L. (1972) Dento-facial changes produced during and after use of a modified Milwaukee brace on Macaca mulatta. Amer.J.Orthodont. 66:599-617.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DROSCHL, H. (1973) The effect of heavy orthopedic forces on the maxilla in growing Saimiri sciureus (squirrel monkey). Amer.J.Orthodont. 63:449-461.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EDLER, J.R. & TUENGE, R.H. (1974) Cephalometric and histologic changes produced by extra-oral high-pull traction to the maxilla in Macaca mulatta. Amer.J.Orthodont. 66:599-617.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GELBKE, H. (1951) The influence of pressure and tension on growing bone experiments with animals. J. Bone & Joint Surg. 33A947-954.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GIANELLY, A.A. & VALENTINI, V. (1976) The role of ‘orthopedics’ and orthodontics in the treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions. Amer.J.Orthodont. 69:668-678.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GRABER, T.M., CHUNG, D.D.B. & AOBA, J.T. (1968) Dento-facial orthopedics versus orthodontics. Aust. Orthodont.J. 1:84-105.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GRABER, L.W. (1975) The alterability of mandibular growth. In: McNamara, J.A. Jnr. (Ed), Determinants of mandibular form and growth, Monograph No. 4., Craniofacial growth series. Center for Human Growth & Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GRABER, L.W. (1977) Chin-cup therapy for mandibular prognathism. Amer.J.Orthodont. 72:23-40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAAS, S.L. (1948) Mechanical retardation of bone growth. J, Bone & Joint Surg. 30A:506-512.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JANZEN, C.K. & BLUHER, J.A. (1965) The cephalometric, anatomic and histological changes in Macaca mulatta after application of continuous acting retraction force on the mandible. Amer.J.Orthodont. 51:823-855.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KING, E.W. (1957) Cervical anchorage in Class II, Division 1 treatment : A cephalometric appraisal. Angle Orthodont. 27:98-104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KLEIN, P.L. (1957) An evaluation of cervical traction on the maxilla and the upper first permanent molar. Angle Orthodont. 27:61-68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LOGAN, W.R. (1968) Recovery of the dento-facial complex after orthopedic treatment for scoliosis. Trans.Eur. Orthodont.Soc. 197-207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MELDRUM, R.J. (1975) Alterations in the upper facial growth of Macaca mulatta resulting from the high-pull headgear. Amer.J.Orthodont. 67:393-411.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MELSEN, B. (1978) Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment : An implant study. Amer.J.Orthodont. 73:526-539.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MILLS, C.M., HOLMAN, R.G. & GRABER, T.M. (1978) Heavy intermittent cervical traction in Class II treatment : A longitudinal cephalometric assessment. Amer.J.Orthodont. 74:361-379.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MOORE, A.W. (1959) Orthodontic treatment factors in Class II malocclusion. Amer.J.Orthodont. 45:323-352.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PEREZ-MARTINEZ, C. (1960) Cranial deformations among the Guanes Indians of Colombia. Amer.J.Orthodont. 46:539-543.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PETROVIC, A.G., STUTZMANN, J.J. & OUDET, C.L. (1975) Control processes in the post-natal growth of the condylar cartilage of the mandible. In: McNamara, J.A. Jnr. (Ed), Determinants of mandibular form and growth, Monograph No. 4., Craniofacial growth series. Center for Human Growth & Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
POULTON, D.R. (1964) Three-year survey of Class II malocclusions with and without headgear therapy. Angle Orthodont. 34:181-193.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
POULTON, D.R. (1967) The influence of extra-oral traction. Amer.J.Orthodont. 53:8-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RICKETTS, R.M. (1960) Influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthodont. 30:103-133.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RINGENBERG, Q.M. & BUTTS, W.C. (1970) A controlled cephalometric evaluation of single-arch cervical traction therapy. Amer.J.Orthodont. 57:179-185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SANDUSKY, W.C. (1965) Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Kloehn type of cervical traction used as an auxiliary with the Edgewise mechanism following Tweed’s principles for correction of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Amer.J.Orthodont. 51:262-287.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SPROULE, W.R. (1969) Dental facial changes produced by extraoral cervical traction to the maxilla of the macaca mulatta; a histological and serial cephalometric study. Amer.J.Orthodont. 56:532-533.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
THILANDER, B. (1963) Treatment of angle class iii malocclusion with chin-cap. Trans.Eur.Orthodont.Soc. 384-398.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
THILANDER, B. (1965) Chin-cap treatment for Angle Class III malocclusion : A longidutinal study. Trans.Eur.Orthodont.Soc. 311-327.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VEGO, L. (1976) Early orthopedic treatment for Class III skeletal patterns. Amer.J.Orthodont. 70:59-69.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WEINMANN, J.P. & SICHER, H. (1955) Bone and Bones. Fundamentals of Bone Biology. C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WIESLANDER, L. (1963) The effect of orthodontic treatment on the concurrent development of the craniofacial complex. Amer.J.Orthodont. 49:15-27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WIESLANDER, L. (1974a) The effect of force on craniofacial development. Amer.J.Orthodont. 65:531-538.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WIESLANDER, L. (1974b) Physiologic recovery after cervical traction therapy. Amer.J.Orthodont. 66:294-301.
]Search in Google Scholar
