1. bookVolume 23 (2023): Edizione 4 (November 2023)
Dettagli della rivista
Prima pubblicazione
25 Nov 2011
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Accesso libero

From Animal Personality to Animal Individuality in Farm Animals – A Review

Pubblicato online: 13 Nov 2023
Volume & Edizione: Volume 23 (2023) - Edizione 4 (November 2023)
Pagine: 913 - 925
Ricevuto: 14 Dec 2022
Accettato: 21 Apr 2023
Dettagli della rivista
Prima pubblicazione
25 Nov 2011
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno

Adamczyk K. (2018). Dairy cattle welfare as a result of human-animal relationship – a review. Ann. Anim. Sci., 18: 601–622. Search in Google Scholar

Adamczyk K., Gil Z., Felenczak A., Skrzyński G., Zapletal P., Choroszy Z. (2011). Relationship between milk yield of cows and their 24-hour walking activity. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 29: 185–195. Search in Google Scholar

Adamczyk K., Pokorska J., Makulska J., Earley B., Mazurek M. (2013). Genetic analysis and evaluation of behavioural traits in cattle. Livest. Sci., 154: 1–12. Search in Google Scholar

Adrion F., Kapun A., Eckert F., Holland E.M., Staiger M., Götz S., Gallmann E. (2018). Monitoring trough visits of growing-finishing pigs with UHF-RFID. Comput. Electron. Agricult., 144: 144–153. Search in Google Scholar

Akhigbe B.I., Munir K., Akinade O., Akanbi L., Oyedele L.O. (2021). IoT technologies for livestock management: a review of present status, opportunities, and future trends. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 5: 10. Search in Google Scholar

Alhamada M., Debus N., Lurette A., Bocquier F. (2016). Validation of automated electronic oestrus detection in sheep as an alternative to visual observation. Small Rum. Res., 134: 97–104. Search in Google Scholar

Amiot C.E., Bastian B. (2015). Toward a psychology of human-animal relations. Psychol. Bull., 141: 6. Search in Google Scholar

Andrews K. (2020). Ethical implications of animal personhood and the role for science. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XXII, 1: 13–32. Search in Google Scholar

Ashton M.C., Lee K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 11: 150–166. Search in Google Scholar

Aydin A. (2016). Precision feeding in laying hens by sound technology. J. Tekird. Agricult. Facult., 13: 3. Search in Google Scholar

Babst G.A. (2011). Moral community. In: Encyclopedia of global justice, Chatterjee D.K. (ed.). Dordrecht, Deutschland, Springer, pp. 710–711. Search in Google Scholar

Battini M., Agostini A., Mattiello S. (2019). Understanding cows’ emotions on farm: are eye white and ear posture reliable indicators? Animals, 9: 477. Search in Google Scholar

Bentham J. (1789/1996). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 456 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Benton T. (2009). Darwin and Wallace as environmental philosophers. Environ. Values, 18: 487–502. Search in Google Scholar

Benus R.F., Koolhaas J.M., Oortmerssen G.A.V. (1987). Individual differences in behavioural reaction to a changing environment in mice and rats. Behaviour, 100: 105–121. Search in Google Scholar

Bermúdez J.L. (2011). Mindreading and moral significance in non-human animals. In: Handbook to animal ethics, Beauchamp T.L., Frey R.G. (eds). Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, pp. 407–440. Search in Google Scholar

Bouissou M.F., Boissy A., Le Neindre P., Veissier I. (2001). The social behaviour of cattle. In: Social behaviour in farm animals, Keeling L.J., Gonyou H.W. (eds). Cambridge, USA CAB International, pp. 113–145. Search in Google Scholar

Boyland N.K., James R., Mlynski D.T., Madden J. R., Croft D.P. (2013). Spatial proximity loggers for recording animal social networks: consequences of inter-logger variation in performance. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 67: 1877–1890. Search in Google Scholar

Broom D.M. (2006). The evolution of morality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 100: 20–28. Search in Google Scholar

Buller H. (2013). Individuation, the mass and farm animals. Theory, Culture Society, 30: 155–175. Search in Google Scholar

Buskell A. (2022). Cumulative culture and complex cultural traditions. Mind Lang., 37: 284–303. Search in Google Scholar

Cabrera D., Nilsson J.R., Griffen B.D. (2021). The development of animal personality across ontogeny: a cross-species review. Anim. Behav., 173: 137–144. Search in Google Scholar

Callicott J.B. (1989). In defense of the land ethic: essays in environmental philosophy. New York, USA, State University of New York Press, 336 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Camerlink I., Turner S.P., Farish M., Arnott G. (2017). The influence of experience on contest assessment strategies. Sci. Rep., 7: 14492. Search in Google Scholar

Camerlink I., Farish M., D’Eath R.B., Arnott G., Turner S.P. (2018). Long term benefits on social behaviour after early life socialization of piglets. Animals, 8: 192. Search in Google Scholar

Camerlink I., Turner S.P., Farish M., Arnott G. (2019). Advantages of social skills for contest resolution. R. Soc. Open Sci., 6: 181456. Search in Google Scholar

Camerlink I., Chou J.Y., Turner S.P. (2020). Intra-group lethal gang aggression in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus). Animals, 10: 1287. Search in Google Scholar

Capitanio J.P., Widaman K.F. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis of personality structure in adult male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Am. J. Primatol., 65: 289–294. Search in Google Scholar

Carpentier L., Berckmans D., Youssef A., Berckmans D., van Water-schoot T., Johnston D., Ferguson N., Earley B., Fontana I., Tullo E., Guarino M., Vranken E., Norton T. (2018). Automatic cough detection for bovine respiratory disease in a calf house. Biosyst. Eng., 173: 45–56. Search in Google Scholar

Carpentier L., Vranken E., Berckmans D., Paeshuyse J., Norton T. (2019). Development of sound-based poultry health monitoring tool for automated sneeze detection. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 162, 573–581. Search in Google Scholar

Carruthers P. (1992). The animals issue: moral theory in practice. Cambridge, USA, Cambridge University Press, 206 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Cartwright J. (2000). Evolution and human behavior: Darwinian perspectives on human nature. Mendham, Suffolk, UK, MIT Press, Aardvark Editorial, 376 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Cavalieri P. (2003). The animal question: why nonhuman animals deserve human rights, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 192 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Chelotti J.O., Vanrell S.R., Milone D.H., Utsumi S.A., Galli J.R., Rufiner H.L., Giovanini L.L. (2016). A real-time algorithm for acoustic monitoring of ingestive behavior of grazing cattle. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 127: 64–75. Search in Google Scholar

Chen C., Zhu W., Liu D., Steibel J., Siegford J., Wurtz K., Han J., Norton T. (2019). Detection of aggressive behaviours in pigs using a RealSence depth sensor. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 166: 105003. Search in Google Scholar

Chen C., Zhu W., Norton T. (2021). Behaviour recognition of pigs and cattle: Journey from computer vision to deep learning. Comput. Electron. Agric., 187: 106255. Search in Google Scholar

Chopra K., Hodges H.R., Barker Z.E., Diosdado J.A.V. (2020). Proximity interactions in a permanently housed dairy herd: network structure, consistency, and individual differences. Front. Vet. Sci., 7: 583715. Search in Google Scholar

Clarke S., Zohny H., Savulescu J. (2021). Rethinking moral status. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 352 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Corbet N.J., Patison K. P., Menzies D.J., Swain D.L. (2018). Using temporal associations to determine postpartum oestrus in tropical beef cows. Anim. Product. Sci., 58: 1465–1469. Search in Google Scholar

Coulon M., Baudoin C., Heyman Y., Deputte B.L. (2011). Cattle discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by using only head visual cues. Anim. Cogn., 14: 279–290. Search in Google Scholar

D’Eath R.B., Jack M., Futro A., Talbot D., Zhu Q., Barclay D., Baxter E.M. (2018). Automatic early warning of tail biting in pigs: 3D cameras can detect lowered tail posture before an outbreak. PLoS ONE, 13: 194524. Search in Google Scholar

De Waal F., Macedo S.E., Ober J.E. (2006). Primates and philosophers. How morality evolved. Princeton and Oxford, UK, Princeton University Press, 232 pp. Search in Google Scholar

De Waal F.B.M., Churchland P.S., Pievani T., Parmigiani S. (2014). Evolved morality: the biology and philosophy of human conscience. Behaviour, 151: 137–141. Search in Google Scholar

DeGrazia D. (2002). Animal rights: a very short introduction. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 131 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Donaldson S., Kymlicka W. (2011). Zoopolis: a political theory of animal rights. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 329 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Dufourcq A. (2021). The imaginary of animals. London, UK, Rout-ledge, 1st Edition, 280 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Fan B., Bryant R., Greer A. (2022). Behavioral fingerprinting: acceleration sensors for identifying changes in livestock health. J., 5: 435–454. Search in Google Scholar

Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC) (2009). Farm animal welfare in Great Britain: past, present and future. London, UK, (source: http://www.fawc.org.uk). Search in Google Scholar

Fast L.A., Funder D.C. (2008). Personality as manifest in word use: correlations with self-report, acquaintance report and behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 94: 334–346. Search in Google Scholar

Fernandes D.P.B., da Silva I.J.O., Nazareno A.C., Donofre A.C. (2015). Farm animals’s cognition and the tests used on its evaluation. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol., 3: 9–19. Search in Google Scholar

Finkemeier M-A., Langbein J., Puppe B. (2018). Personality research in mammalian farm animals: concepts, measures, and relationship to welfare. Front. Vet. Sci., 5: 131. Search in Google Scholar

Foris B., Thompson A., von Keyserlingk M., Melzer N., Weary D. (2019). Automatic detection of feeding- and drinking-related agonistic behavior and dominance in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 9176–9186. Search in Google Scholar

Forkosh O. (2021). Animal behavior and animal personality from a non-human perspective: getting help from the machine. Patterns, 2: 100194. Search in Google Scholar

Francione G.L. (2008). Animals as persons: essays on the abolition of animal exploitation. New York, USA, Columbia University Press, 256 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Fraser D. (2012). Animal ethics and food production in the twenty-first century. In: The philosophy of food, Kaplan D.M. (ed.). Berkeley, USA, University of California Press, pp. 190–213. Search in Google Scholar

Frondelius L., Järvenranta K., Koponen T., Mononen J. (2015). The effects of body posture and temperament on heart rate variability in dairy cows. Physiol. Behav., 139: 437–441. Search in Google Scholar

Gartner M.C. (2015). Pet personality: a review. Pers. Individ. Differ., 75: 102–113. Search in Google Scholar

Gilbert B. (2022). The problem of anthropocentrism and the human kind of personhood. Philos. Soc. Crit.: 01914537221110900. Search in Google Scholar

Gosling S.D. (2001). From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychol. Bull., 127: 45–86. Search in Google Scholar

Gosling S.D., John O.P. (1999). Personality dimensions in nonhuman animals: a cross-species review. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 8: 69–75. Search in Google Scholar

Gosling S.D., Vazire S. (2002). Are we barking up the right tree? Evaluating the comparative approach to personality. J. Res. Pers., 36: 607–614. Search in Google Scholar

Gosling S.D. (2008). Personality in non-human animals. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass, 2/2: 985–1001. Search in Google Scholar

Goursot C., Düpjan S., Kanitz E., Tuchscherer A., Puppe B., Leliveld L.M.C. (2019). Assessing animal individuality: links between personality and laterality in pigs. Curr. Zool., 65: 541–551. Search in Google Scholar

Grandin T. (2021). The visual, auditory, and physical environment of livestock handling facilities and its effect on ease of movement of cattle, pigs, and sheep. Front. Anim. Sci., 2: 744207. Search in Google Scholar

Gray K., Young L., Waytz A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychol. Inq., 23: 2. Search in Google Scholar

Green A., Clark C., Favaro L., Lomax S., Reby D. (2019). Vocal individuality of Holstein-Friesian cattle is maintained across putatively positive and negative farming contexts. Sci. Rep., 9: 18468. Search in Google Scholar

Guzhva O., Ardö H., Herlin A., Nilsson M., Åström K., Bergsten C. (2016). Feasibility study for the implementation of an automatic system for the detection of social interactions in the waiting area of automatic milking stations by using a video surveillance system. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 127: 506–509. Search in Google Scholar

Gygax L., Nawroth C. (2019). Farm animals are not humans in sheep clothing. Commentary on Marino & Merskin on sheep complexity. Anim. Sentience, 237. Search in Google Scholar

Hagen K., Broom D.M. (2004). Emotional reactions to learning in cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 85: 203–213. Search in Google Scholar

Halachmi I., Guarino M. (2016). Editorial: precision livestock farming: a ‘per animal’ approach using advanced monitoring technologies. Animal, 10: 1482–1483. Search in Google Scholar

Hemsworth P.H. (2018). Key determinants of pig welfare: implications of animal management and housing design on livestock welfare. Anim. Prod. Sci., 58: 1375–1386. Search in Google Scholar

Hemsworth P.H., Coleman G.J. (2011). Human-livestock interactions: the stockperson and the productivity of intensively farmed animals. 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK, CABI, 194 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Herbeck Y.E., Eliava M., Grinevich V., MacLean E.L. (2022). Fear, love, and the origins of canid domestication: An oxytocin hypothesis. Compr. Psychoneuroendocrinol., 9: 100100. Search in Google Scholar

Hessing M.J.C., Hagelso A.M., Schouten W.G.P., Wiepkema P.R., Van Beek J.A.M. (1994). Individual behavioral and physiological strategies in pigs. Physiol. Behav., 55: 39–46. Search in Google Scholar

Islam M.A., Lomax S., Doughty A.K., Islam M.R., Thomson P.C., Clark C.E.F. (2021). Revealing the diversity in cattle behavioural response to high environmental heat using accelerometer-based ear tag sensors. Comput. Electron. Agric., 191: 106511. Search in Google Scholar

Iversen M., Bolhuis J., Camerlink I., Ursinus W., Reimert I., Duijvesteijn N. (2017). Heritability of the backtest response in piglets and its genetic correlations with production traits. Animal, 11: 556–563. Search in Google Scholar

Johnsen J.F., Zipp K.A., Kälber T., Passillé A.M. de, Knierim U., Barth K., Mejdell C.M. (2016). Is rearing calves with the dam a feasible option for dairy farms? – Current and future research. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 181: 1–11. Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser M.I., Müller C. (2021). What is an animal personality? Biol. Philos., 36: 1. Search in Google Scholar

Kant I. (1797/2017). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 308 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Kashiha M., Bahr C., Haredasht S.A., Ott S., Moons C.P.H., Niewold T.A., Ödberg F.O., Berckmans D.. (2013). The automatic monitoring of pigs water use by cameras. Comput. Electron. Agric., 90: 164–169. Search in Google Scholar

King J.E., Weiss A., Sisco M.M. (2008). Aping humans: age and sex effects in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and human (Homo sapiens) personality. J. Comp. Psychol., 122: 418–427. Search in Google Scholar

Ko H.L., Chong Q., Escribano D., Camerlink I., Manteca X., Llonch P. (2020). Pre-weaning socialization and environmental enrichment affect life-long response to regrouping in commercially-reared pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 229: 105044. Search in Google Scholar

Koski S.E. (2011). How to measure animal personality and why does it matter? Integrating the psychological and biological approaches to animal personality. In: From genes to animal behavior. Social structures, personalities, communication by color, Inoue-Murayama M., Kawamura S., Weiss A. (eds). Tokyo, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, Japan, Nederland, Deutschland, UK, USA, Springer, pp. 115–136. Search in Google Scholar

Kralj-Fišer S., Schuett W. (2014). Studying personality variation in invertebrates: why bother? Anim. Behav., 91: 41–52. Search in Google Scholar

Kremer L., Bus J.D., Webb L.E., Bokkers E.A.M., Engel B., van der Werf J.T.N., Schnabel S.K., van Reenen C.G. (2021). Housing and personality effects on judgement and attention biases in dairy cows. Sci. Rep., 11: 22984. Search in Google Scholar

Kumar S., Singh S.K. (2020). Cattle recognition: a new frontier in visual animal biometrics research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci., 90: 689–708. Search in Google Scholar

Leach H.M. (2003). Human domestication reconsidered. Curr. Anthropol., 44: 349–368. Search in Google Scholar

Lee H.-J., Roberts S.J., Drake K.A., Dawkins M.S. (2011). Prediction of feather damage in laying hens using optical flows and Markov models. J. Roy. Soc. Interface, 8: 489–499. Search in Google Scholar

Lee J., Jin L., Park D., Chung Y. (2016). Automatic recognition of aggressive behavior in pigs using a kinect depth sensor. Sensors, 16: 631. Search in Google Scholar

Lee J., Noh B., Jang S., Park D., Chung Y., Chang H.H. (2015). Stress detection and classification of laying hens by sound analysis. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci., 28: 592–598. Search in Google Scholar

Leopold A. (1949/1987). A sand county almanac. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 226 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Li L., Zhao Y., Oliveira J., Verhoijsen W., Liu K., Xin H. (2017). A UHF RFID system for studying individual feeding and nesting behaviors of group-housed laying hens. Trans. ASABE, 60: 1337–1347. Search in Google Scholar

Liu L.S., Ni J.Q., Zhao R.Q., Shen M.X., He C.L., Lu M.Z. (2018). Design and test of a low-power acceleration sensor with Bluetooth Low Energy on ear tags for sow behaviour monitoring. Biosyst. Eng., 176: 162–171. Search in Google Scholar

Luu J., Johnsen J F., de Passillé A.M., de Rushen J. (2013). Which measures of acceleration best estimate the duration of locomotor play by dairy calves? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 148: 21–27. Search in Google Scholar

Mainau E., Dalmau A., Ruiz-de-la-Torre J.L., Manteca X. (2009). Validation of an automatic system to detect position changes in puerperal sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 121: 96–102. Search in Google Scholar

Maltby J., Day L., Macaskill A. (2010). Personality, individual differences and intelligence. Harlow, UK, Pearson Education, 2nd ed., 675 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Mandel R., Whay H.R., Klement E., Nicol C.J. (2016). Invited review: environmental enrichment of dairy cows and calves in indoor housing. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 1695–1715. Search in Google Scholar

Manteuffel C., Hartung E., Schmidt M., Hoffmann G., Schön P.C. (2015). Towards qualitative and quantitative prediction and detection of parturition onset in sows using light barriers. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 116: 201–210. Search in Google Scholar

Marino L. (2017). Thinking chickens: A review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken. Anim. Cogn., 20: 127–147. Search in Google Scholar

Marino L., Merskin D. (2019). Intelligence, complexity, and individuality in sheep. Anim. Sentience, 206: 1–26. Search in Google Scholar

Marino L., Allen K. (2017). The psychology of cows. Anim. Behav. Cogn., 4: 474–498. Search in Google Scholar

Marino L., Colvin C.M. (2015). Thinking pigs: a comparative review of cognition, emotion, and personality in Sus domesticus. International J. Comp. Psychol., 28. Search in Google Scholar

Maselyne J., Adriaens I., Huybrechts T., de Ketelaere B., Millet S., Vangeyte J., van Nuffel A., Saeys W. (2016 a). Measuring the drinking behaviour of individual pigs housed in group using radio frequency identification (RFID). Animal, 10: 1557–1566. Search in Google Scholar

Maselyne J., Saeys W., Briene P., Mertens K., Vangeyte J., De Ketelaere B., Hessel E.F., Sonck B., Van Nuffel A. (2016 b). Methods to construct feeding visits from RFID registrations of growing-finishing pigs at the feed trough. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 128: 9–19. Search in Google Scholar

Mather J.A., Carere C. (2019). Consider the individual: personality and welfare in invertebrates. In: The welfare of invertebrate animals. Animal welfare, Carere C., Mather J. (eds). Cham, Switzerland, Springer, pp. 229–245. Search in Google Scholar

McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In: Handbook of personality: theory and research, John O.P., Robins R.W., Pervin L.A. (eds). New York, USA, Guilford Press, 3rd ed., pp. 159–181. Search in Google Scholar

McLennan K., Mahmoud M. (2019). Development of an automated pain facial expression detection system for sheep (Ovis aries). Animals, 9: 1–7. Search in Google Scholar

Meagher R.K., Strazhnik E., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2020). Assessing the motivation to learn in cattle. Sci. Rep., 10: 6847. Search in Google Scholar

Mellor D.J., Beausoleil N.J., Littlewood K.E., McLean A.N., Mc-Greevy P.D., Jones B., Wilkins C. (2020). The 2020 Five Domains Model: including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals, 10: 1870. Search in Google Scholar

Melotti L., Oostindjer M., Bolhuis J.E., Held S., Mendl M. (2011). Coping personality type and environmental enrichment affect aggression at weaning in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 133: 144–153. Search in Google Scholar

Monsó S. (2017). Morality without mindreading. Mind Lang., 32: 338–357. Search in Google Scholar

Morgan T., Pluske J., Miller D., Collins T., Barnes A.L., Wemelsfelder F., Fleming P.A. (2014). Socialising piglets in lactation positively affects their post-weaning behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 158: 23–33. Search in Google Scholar

Mota-Rojas D., Broom D.M., Orihuela A., Velarde A., Napolitano F., Alonso-Spilsbury M. (2020). Effects of human-animal relationship on animal productivity and welfare. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol., 8: 196–205. Search in Google Scholar

Nasirahmadi A., Hensel O., Edwards S., Sturm B. (2016). Automatic detection of mounting behaviours among pigs using image analysis. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 124: 295–302. Search in Google Scholar

Navon S., Mizrach A., Hetzroni A., Ungar E.D. (2013). Automatic recognition of jaw movements in free-ranging cattle, goats and sheep, using acoustic monitoring. Biosyst. Eng., 114: 474–483. Search in Google Scholar

Nawroth C., Langbein J., Coulon M., Gabor V., Oesterwind S., Benz-Schwarzburg J., von Borell E. (2019). Farm animal cognition – linking behavior, welfare and ethics. Front. Vet. Sci., 6: 24. Search in Google Scholar

Neave H., Weary D., von Keyserlingk M. (2018). Review: individual variability in feeding behaviour of domesticated ruminants. Animal, 12: S419-S430. Search in Google Scholar

Neethirajan S. (2020). The role of sensors, big data and machine learning in modern animal farming. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res., 29: 100367. Search in Google Scholar

Neethirajan S., Reimert I., Kemp B. (2021). Measuring farm animal emotions – sensor-based approaches. Sensors, 21: 553. Search in Google Scholar

Noddings N. (1984). Caring: a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley – Los Angeles, USA, University of California Press, 216 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Nogues E., Lecorps B., Weary D.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. (2020). Individual variability in response to social stress in dairy heifers. Animals, 10: 1440. Search in Google Scholar

Norris D., Ng‘ambi J.W., Mabelebele M., Alabi O.J., Benyi K. (2014). Genetic selection for docility: a review. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 24: 13–18. Search in Google Scholar

Nowicki J., Klocek C., Schwarz T. (2012). Factors affecting maternal behaviour and responsiveness in sows during periparturient and lactation periods. Ann. Anim. Sci., 12: 455–469. Search in Google Scholar

Nowicki J., Schwarz T. (2010). Maternal responsiveness of sows housed in two farrowing environments measured in behavioural tests. Ann. Anim. Sci., 10: 179–186. Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum M. (2006). Frontiers of justice disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, USA, Harward University Press, 512 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Okinda C., Lu M., Nyalala I., Li J., Shen M. (2018). Asphyxia occur-rence detection in sows during the farrowing phase by inter-birth interval evaluation. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 152: 221–232. Search in Google Scholar

O’Malley C., Turner S.P., D’Eath R.B., Steibel J., Bates R., Ernst C., Siegford J. (2019). Animal personality in the management and welfare of pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 218: 104821. Search in Google Scholar

Paraforos D.S., Griepentrog H.W. (2021). Digital farming and field robotics: internet of things, cloud computing, and Big Data. In: Fundamentals of agricultural and field robotics. Agriculture automation and control, Karkee M., Zhang Q. (eds). Cham, Switzerland, Springer, pp. 365–385. Search in Google Scholar

Pastell M., Hietaoja J., Yun J., Tiusanen J., Valros A. (2016). Predicting farrowing of sows housed in crates and pens using accelerometers and CUSUM charts. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 127: 197–203. Search in Google Scholar

Paul E.S., Harding E.J., Mendl M. (2005). Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 29: 469–491. Search in Google Scholar

Peden R.S., Turner S.P., Boyle L.A., Camerlink I. (2018). The translation of animal welfare research into practice: the case of mixing aggression between pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 204: 1–9. Phillips C. (2019). Sacrificial lambs. Anim. Sent., 25. Search in Google Scholar

Pitts A.D., Weary D.M., Pajor E.A., Fraser D. (2000). Mixing at young ages reduces fighting in unacquainted domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 68: 191–197. Search in Google Scholar

Pollo S. (2007). Animal welfare, animal minds and animal individuality. In: Course. Human and non-human animals interaction: contextual, normative and applicative aspects, Vitale A., Laviola G., Manciocco A., Adriani W. (eds). Roma, Italy, Rapporti ISTISAN 07/40, pp. 95–101. Search in Google Scholar

Prunier A., Averos X., Dimitrov I., Edwards S.A., Hillmann E., Holinger M., Ilieski V., Leming R., Tallet C., Turner S.P., Zupan M., Camerlink I. (2020). Review: early life predisposing factors for biting in pigs. Animal, 14: 570–587. Search in Google Scholar

Quwaider M., Daigle C.L., Biswas S.K., Siegford J.M., Swanson J.C. (2010). Development of a wireless body-mounted sensor to monitor location and activity of laying hens in a non-cage housing system. Trans. ASABE., 53: 1705–1713. Search in Google Scholar

Ramsey G. (2013). Culture in humans and other animals. Biol. Philos., 28: 457–479. Search in Google Scholar

Rasmuson M. (2010). Trends in genetics – before the Molecular Era. Hereditas, 147: 243–249. Search in Google Scholar

Rault J.-L., Waiblinger S., Boivin X., Hemsworth P. (2020). The power of a positive human–animal relationship for animal welfare. Front. Vet. Sci., 7. Search in Google Scholar

Ravisankar H., Naidu V.S.G.R, Sivaraju K., Babu B.J., Sivarao P. (2014). Expert system for dairy cattle management. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 84: 891–896. Search in Google Scholar

Réale D., Reader S.M., Sol D., McDougall P.T., Dingemanse N.J. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol. Rev., 82: 291–318. Search in Google Scholar

Regan T. (1983). The case for animals rights. Berkeley, Los Angeles, USA, University of California Press, 474 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Regan T. (2006). Sentience and rights. In: Animals, Ethics and Trade, Turner J., D’Silva J. (eds). Routledge, 1st Edition, New York, USA, pp. 79–86. Search in Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Baena D.S., Gomez-Vela F.A., García-Torres M., Divina F., Barranco C.D., Daz-Diaz N., Jimenez M., Montalvo G. (2020). Identifying livestock behavior patterns based on accelerometer dataset. J. Comput. Sci., 41: 101076. Search in Google Scholar

Roland L., Lidauer L., Sattlecker G., Kickinger F., Auer W., Sturm V., Efrosinin D., Drillich M., Iwersen M. (2018). Monitoring drinking behavior in bucket-fed dairy calves using an ear-attached tri-axial accelerometer: a pilot study. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 145: 298–301. Search in Google Scholar

Rossi J., Garner S.A. (2014). Industrial farm animal production: a comprehensive moral critique. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 27: 479–522. Röttgen V., Schön P.C., Becker F., Tuchscherer A., Wrenzycki C., Search in Google Scholar

Düpjan S., Puppe B. (2020). Automatic recording of individual oestrus vocalisation in group-housed dairy cattle: development of a cattle call monitor. Animal, 14: 198–205. Search in Google Scholar

Rowlands M. (2012). Can animals be moral? New York, USA, Oxford University Press, 272 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Rowlands M. (2016). Consciousness and the unity of mind. Anim. Sentience, 10: 1–15. Search in Google Scholar

Ruis M.A.W., te Brake J.H.A., van de Burgwal J.A., de Jong I.C., Blokhuis H.J., Koolhaas J.M. (2000). Personalities in female domesticated pigs: behavioural and physiological indications. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 66: 31–47. Search in Google Scholar

Salazar L.C., Ko H.L., Yang C.H., Llonch L., Manteca X., Camerlink I., Llonch P. (2018). Early socialisation as a strategy to increase piglets’ social skills in intensive farming conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 206: 25–31. Search in Google Scholar

Schillings J., Bennett R., Rose D.C. (2021). Exploring the potential of precision livestock farming technologies to help address farm animal welfare. Front. Anim. Sci., 2: 639678. Search in Google Scholar

Schön P.C., Puppe B., Manteuffel G. (2004). Automated recording of stress vocalisations as a tool to document impaired welfare in pigs. Anim. Welfare, 13: 105–110. Search in Google Scholar

Schönfeld M. (2006). Animal consciousness: paradigm change in the life sciences. Perspect. Sci., 14: 354–381. Search in Google Scholar

Schweitzer A. (1955). Civilization and ethics. London, UK, Adam & Charles Black, XXVIII, 284 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Shahzadi R., Ferzund J., Tausif M., Suryani M.A. (2016). Internet of things based expert system for smart agriculture. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 7: 341–350. Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro P. (2006). Moral agency in other animals. Theor. Med. Bioeth., 27: 357–373. Search in Google Scholar

Sih A., Bell A., Johnson J.C. (2004 a). Behavioral syndromes: anecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol., 19: 372–378. Search in Google Scholar

Sih A., Bell A.M., Johnson J.C., Ziemba R.E. (2004 b). Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q. Rev. Biol., 79: 241–277. Search in Google Scholar

Simitzis P., Tzanidakis C., Tzamaloukas O., Sossidou E. (2022). Contribution of precision livestock farming systems to the Improvement of welfare status and productivity of dairy animals. Dairy, 3: 12–28. Search in Google Scholar

Singer P. (1975). Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York, USA, HarperCollins, 311 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Singer P. (1981). The expanding circle: ethics and sociobiology. Oxford, UK, Clarendon Press, 208 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Singer P. (2011). Practical ethics. New Jersey, USA, Princeton University, 3rd ed., 356 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Slater P.J.B. (1981). Individual differences in animal behavior. In: Perspectives in Ethology, Advantages of Diversity, Bateson P.P.G., Klopfer P. (eds). Plenum Press, New York, USA, pp. 35–49. Search in Google Scholar

Solomon T., Hussen E. (2018). Benefits of farm animals genetic adaptation: a review. Eur. Exp. Biol., 8: 22. Search in Google Scholar

Sorabji R. (2018). Animal minds and human morals. New York, USA, Cornell University Press, 272 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Steiner G. (2008). Animals and the moral community. New York, USA, Columbia University Press, 232 pp. Search in Google Scholar

Swain D.L., Bishop-Hurley G.J. (2007). Using contact logging devices to explore animal affiliations: quantifying cow-calf interactions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 102: 1–11. Search in Google Scholar

Sytsma J., Machery E. (2012). The two sources of moral standing. Rev. Phil. Psych., 3: 303–324. Search in Google Scholar

Thompson R., Matheson S.M., Plötz T., Edwards S.A., Kyriazakis I. (2016). Porcine lie detectors: automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 127: 521–530. Search in Google Scholar

Torrance S. (2013). Artificial agents and the expanding ethical circle. AI Soc., 28: 399–414. Search in Google Scholar

Tu X., Du S., Tang L., Xin H., Wood B. (2011). A real-time automated system for monitoring individual feed intake and body weight of group housed turkeys. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 75: 313–320. Search in Google Scholar

Van Der Sluis M., De Klerk B., Ellen E.D., De Haas Y., Hijink T., Rodenburg T.B. (2019). Validation of an ultra-wideband tracking system for recording individual levels of activity in broilers. Animals, 9: 580. Search in Google Scholar

Vayssade J.A., Arquet R., Bonneau M. (2019). Automatic activity tracking of goats using drone camera. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 162: 767–772. Search in Google Scholar

Viazzi S., Ismayilova G., Oczak M., Sonoda L.T., Fels M., Guarino M., Vranken E., Hartung J., Bahr C., Berckmans D. (2014). Image feature extraction for classification of aggressive interactions among pigs. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 104: 57–62. Search in Google Scholar

Volkmann N., Kulig B., Hoppe S., Stracke J., Hensel O., Kemper N. (2021). On-farm detection of claw lesions in dairy cows based on acoustic analyses and machine learning. J. Dairy Sci., 104: 5921–5931. Search in Google Scholar

Warren M.A. (1997). Moral status. Obligations to persons and other living things. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, pp. 182–183. Search in Google Scholar

Waytz A., Gray K., Epley N., Wegner D.M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends Cogn. Sci., 14: 383–388. Search in Google Scholar

Weiss A., King J.E., Hopkins W.D. (2007). A cross-setting study of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) personality structure and development: zoological parks and Yerkes National Primate Research Center. Am. J. Primatol., 69: 1–14. Search in Google Scholar

Welfare Quality® (WQ) (2009). Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands, (source: http://www.welfarequalitynetwork.net). Search in Google Scholar

Werkheiser I. (2018). Precision livestock farming and farmers’ duties to livestock. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 31: 181–195. Search in Google Scholar

Williams L.R., Moore S.T., Bishop-Hurley G.J., Swain D.L. (2020). A sensor-based solution to monitor grazing cattle drinking behaviour and water intake. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 168: 105141. Search in Google Scholar

Wise S.M. (1999). Animal thing to animal person-thoughts on time, place, and theories. Animal L., Essays, 5: 61–68. Search in Google Scholar

Xiao L., Ding K., Gao Y., Rao X. (2019). Behavior-induced health condition monitoring of caged chickens using binocular vision. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 156: 254–262. Search in Google Scholar

Yajuvendra S., Lathwal S.S., Rajput N., Raja T.V., Gupta A.K., Mohanty T.K., Ruhil A.P., Chakravarty A.K., Sharma P.C., Sharma V., Chandra G. (2013). Effective and accurate discrimination of individual dairy cattle through acoustic sensing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 146: 11–18. Search in Google Scholar

Yang A., Huang H., Yang X., Li S., Chen C., Gan H., Xue Y. (2019). Automated video analysis of sow nursing behavior based on fully convolutional network and oriented optical flow. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 167: 105048. Search in Google Scholar

Yang A., Huang H., Zheng B., Li S., Gan H., Chen C., Yang X., Xue Y. (2020). An automatic recognition framework for sow daily behaviours based on motion and image analyses. Biosyst. Eng., 192: 56–71. Search in Google Scholar

Zeder M.A. (2017). Domestication as a model system for the extended evolutionary synthesis. Interface Focus, 7: 20160133. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang F.Y., Hu Y.M., Chen L.C., Guo L.H., Duan W.J., Wang L. (2016). Monitoring behavior of poultry based on RFID radio frequency network. Int. J. Agricult. Biol. Eng., 9: 139–147. Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD