Digital Learning Models in Macro-Educational Reform

[1] Jesson, Rebecca, McNaughton, Stuart, Rosedale, & Naomi, et al. (2018). A mixed-methods study to identify effective practices in the teaching of writing in a digital learning environment in low income schools. Computers & education. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Joo-Nagata, J., Martinez Abad, F., García-Bermejo Giner, José, & García-Pe?alvo, Francisco J. (2017). Augmented reality and pedestrian navigation through its implementation in m-learning and e-learning: evaluation of an educational program in chile. Computers & Education, 111(AUG.), 1-17. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Tarus, J. K., Niu, Z., & Kalui, D. (2017). A hybrid recommender system for e-learning based on context awareness and sequential pattern mining. Soft Computing. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Lau, Kwok, Hung, Tri, Lam, & Kam, et al. (2018). The role of textbook learning resources in e-learning: a taxonomic study. Computers & Education. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Luo, L., Cheng, X., Wang, S., Zhang, J., Zhu, W., & Yang, J., et al. (2017). Blended learning with moodle in medical statistics: an assessment of knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to e-learning. Bmc Medical Education, 17(1), 170. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Tojo, T., Ono, O., Noh, N. B., & Yusof, R. (2018). Interactive tutor robot for collaborative e-learning system. Electrical Engineering in Japan, 203(3), 22-29. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Falusi, O. O., Weisz, J., Clarence, I., Lichtenstein, C., Coddington, D., & Avent, G., et al. (2022). Leveraging e-learning and community assets to “teach” residents to address child poverty. Academic pediatrics. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lee, S. (2020). Development of web-based e-learning educational contents for organ donation and transplantation toward medical students and medical personnel. Transplantation, 104. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Johnson, S., Bamber, D., Bountziouka, V., Clayton, S., Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C., et al. (2019). Improving developmental and educational support for children born preterm: evaluation of an e-learning resource for education professionals. BMJ Open, 9(6). Search in Google Scholar

[10] Hortsch, M., & Rodenbarger, L. (2019). When students choose e-learning resources—the importance of ease and convenience. The FASEB Journal, 33. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Larkin, E., O’Connor, K., & Mcnally, P. (2019). P250 improving e-learning environments for tomorrow’s paediatricians. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 104(Suppl 3), A257-. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Luo, N., Zhang, M., & Qi, D. (2017). Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 115(dec.), 153-160. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in azerbaijan? the general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111(AUG.), 128-143. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Klasnja-Milicevic, Aleksandra, Vesin, Boban, Ivanovic, & Mirjana. (2018). Social tagging strategy for enhancing e-learning experience. Computers & Education. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Birjali, Marouane, Beni-Hssane, Abderrahim, Erritali, & Mohammed. (2018). A novel adaptive e-learning model based on big data by using competence-based knowledge and social learner activities. Applied Soft Computing. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Cookson, Richard, Ali, Shehzad, Tsuchiya, & Aki, et al. (2018). E-learning and health inequality aversion: a questionnaire experiment. Health Economics. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Sayaf, A. M., Alamri, M. M., Alqahtani, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2021). Information and communications technology used in higher education: an empirical study on digital learning as sustainability. Sustainability, 13. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sharma, KshitijMangaroska, Katerinavan Berkel, NielsGiannakos, MichailKostakos, Vassilis. (2021). Information flow and cognition affect each other: evidence from digital learning. International journal of human-computer studies, 146(1). Search in Google Scholar

[19] Seibert, J., Schmoll, I., Kay, C. W. M., & Huwer, J. (2020). Promoting education for sustainable development with an interactive digital learning companion students use to perform collaborative phosphorus recovery experiments and reporting. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(11). Search in Google Scholar

[20] Gu, P., & Guo, J. (2017). Digital case-based learning system in school. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0187641. Search in Google Scholar

[21] De Meo, P., Messina, F., Rosaci, D., & Sarné, Giuseppe M.L. (2017). Combining trust and skills evaluation to form e-learning classes in online social networks. Information Sciences, 405, 107-122. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Manohar, P., & Maxwell, N. (2021). Social policy practice preferences by social work students: implications for macro practice education. The British Journal of Social Work(8), 8. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Filmer, D., Rogers, H., Angrist, N., & Sabarwal, S. (2020). Learning-adjusted years of schooling (lays): defining a new macro measure of education. Economics of Education Review, 77. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Acquah, E. O., & Katz, H. T. (2020). Digital game-based l2 learning outcomes for primary through high-school students: a systematic literature review. Computers & education, 143(Jan.), 103667.1-103667.19. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Perini, S., Margoudi, M., Oliveira, M. F., & Taisch, M. (2017). Increasing middle school students’ awareness and interest in manufacturing through digital game‐based learning (dgbl). Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(5), 1-15. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Suciu, I., Ndiaye, A., Cédric Baudrit, Fernandez, C., & Kansou, K. (2021). A digital learning tool based on models and simulators for food engineering (mestral). Journal of Food Engineering, 293, 110375. Search in Google Scholar