This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
China’s IP Adapted Mobile Game Market Hit 129.77 Billion Yuan in 2021 (2022). (2022, October 20). [Webpage]. Available from https://www.chyxx.com/industry/1109116.html.Search in Google Scholar
Dean, D. S. (2016). Hitting Reset: Devising a New Video Game Copyright Regime. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 164, 1239-1243.Search in Google Scholar
Article 12 of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works.Search in Google Scholar
Article 16(e) & Article 21(3) of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Goold, P. R. (2014). Why the U.K. Adaptation Right Is Superior to the U.S. Derivative Work Right. Nebraska Law Review, 92(4), 843.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2016). Course of Intellectual Property Law (5th ed.). Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 222.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2016). Creating a Sequel without Permission Infringes the Copyright of the Original Author. State Copyright Administration. Available from http://www.ncac.gov.cn/chinacopyright/contents/4509/293330.html.Search in Google Scholar
2019 Analysis Report on China’s Game Market – Industry Competition Pattern and Future Trend Research (2019). Available from http://market.chinabaogao.com/it/042941Q1H019.html.Search in Google Scholar
What is a “Game Reskin”? (2022, April 14). [Webpage]. Available from https://www.marketjs.com/reskin.Search in Google Scholar
McArthur, S. C. (2013). Clone Wars: The Five Most Important Cases Every Game Developer Should Know. GAMASUTRA. Available from https://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/187385/clone_wars_the_five_most_.php.Search in Google Scholar
Glu Mobile Inc. v. Hothead Games Inc., No. 14-04917, (N.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Blizzard Entertainment Co., Ltd. & Shanghai NetEase Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Youyi Network Technology Co., Ltd., (2014) Hu Yi Zhong Civil Verdict Five (IP) No. 23.Search in Google Scholar
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd. v. Chengdu Tianxiang Interactive Technology Co., Ltd., (2015) Su Zhong IP Civil Verdict No. 00201.Search in Google Scholar
Blizzard Entertainment Co., Ltd. & Shanghai NetEase Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. 4399 Network Co., Ltd., (2017) Hu 0115 Civil Verdict No. 77945.Search in Google Scholar
Parkin, S. (2011). Clone Wars: Is Plagiarism Killing Creativity in the Games Industry? The Guardian. Available from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/gamesblog/2011/dec/21/clone-wars-games-industry-plagiarism.Search in Google Scholar
Article 2.14 & Article 2.15 of the Guidelines for the Trial of Copyright Infringement Cases (Beijing High People’s Court 2018). Available from http://www.prccopyright.org.cn/staticnews/2018-07-11/180711155731166/1.html.Search in Google Scholar
Deng, Z., & Lee, J-A. (2022). Legalization of Live Game Streaming through Statutory License in China. Computer Law & Security Review, 46, 1-8.Search in Google Scholar
Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc., 863 F. Supp.2d 394, 404, 394, 412 (D.N.J. 2012).Search in Google Scholar
Shanghai Zhuangyou Information Technology Co. v. Guangdong Shuoxing Information Technology Co. and others, (2016) Hu 73 Civil final No. 190.Search in Google Scholar
Atari, Inc. v. N. Am. Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 F.2d 607, 615 (7th Cir. 1982).Search in Google Scholar
Lunsford, C. (2013). Drawing a Line Between Idea and Expression in Videogame Copyright: The Evolution of Substantial Similarity for Videogame Clones. Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, 18, 105.Search in Google Scholar
DaVinci Editrice S.R.L. v. Ziko Games LLC, 183 F. Supp. 3d. 820 (S.D. Tex. 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Capcom U.S.A., Inc. v. Data East Corp., No. 93-3259, 1994 WL 1751482, at 12(N.D.Cal.Mar.16,1994).Search in Google Scholar
Apple Comput., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 35 F.3d 1435, 1444(9th Cir. 1994).Search in Google Scholar
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). RULES OF PLAY: GAME DESIGN FUNDAMENTALS (Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press), 13-21.Search in Google Scholar
Corbett, S. (2016). Videogames and Their Clones: How Copyright Law Might Address the Problem. Computer Law& Security Review, 32(4), 615-622.Search in Google Scholar
Ding, W. (2019). The Basic Connotation and Identification Rules of “Access” Element. Intellectual Property, 2, 24.Search in Google Scholar
Cole, R. R. (1995). Substantial Similarity in the Ninth Circuit. Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, 11, 417.Search in Google Scholar
Sun, L., & Cao, L. (2017). JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OF ONLINE GAMES (China Legal Publishing House), 273-284.Search in Google Scholar
Shanghai Shulong Technology Co., Ltd. v. Suzhou Mili Film & Television Culture Communication Co., Ltd, (2016) Hu 0115 Civil Verdict No.82169.Search in Google Scholar
Shanghai Jumping Network Technology Co., Ltd. and others v. Shanghai Fine Arts Film Studio Co., Ltd., (2018) Hu 73 Civil Final No.300.Search in Google Scholar
Gervais, D. (2013). The Derivative Right, or Why Copyright Law Protects Foxes Better than Hedgehogs. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 15, 785.Search in Google Scholar
Guangdong Original Power Culture Communication Co., Ltd. v. Xiamen Shize Network Technology co., Ltd., (2015) Si Civil Verdict No. 4252-4254.Search in Google Scholar
Wemade Entertainment Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Xinshuo Network Technology Co., Ltd., (2017) Hu 0107 Civil Verdict No. 19813.Search in Google Scholar
Wemade Entertainment Co., Ltd. v. 37 Interactive Entertainment (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. and others, (2016) Jing 73 Civil Verdict No.229.Search in Google Scholar
Beijing Wangyuan Shengtang Entertainment Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Xinlongmen Film & Television Co., Ltd., (2016) Hu 0115 Civil Verdict No.62371.Search in Google Scholar
Latman, A. (1990). “Probative Similarity” as Proof of Copying: Toward Dispelling Some Myths in Copyright Infringement. Columbia Law Review, 90, 1187-1214.Search in Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. (2013). The Quest for a Sound Conception of Copyright’s Derivative Work Right. The Georgetown Law Journal, 101, 1528.Search in Google Scholar
Goldstein, P. (1983). Derivative Rights and Derivative Works in Copyright. Journal of Copyright Society of USA, 30, 227.Search in Google Scholar
Abramowicz, M. (2005). A Theory of Copyright’s Derivative Right and Related Doctrine. Minnesota Law Review, 90, 319-320.Search in Google Scholar
Zybert, S. E. (2013). The Derivative Work Right: Incentive or Hindrance for New Literature. Connecticut Law Review, 45, 1089.Search in Google Scholar
Rachum-Twaig, O. (2017). Recreating Copyright: The Cognitive Process of Creation and Copyright Law. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 27(2), 287-348.Search in Google Scholar
Arnstein v. Porter, 154 F. 2d 464, 473 (2d Cir. 1946), cert. denied, 330 U.S. 851 (1947).Search in Google Scholar
Newman, J. O. (1999). New Lyrics for an Old Melody: The Idea/Expression Dichotomy in the Computer Age. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 17, 698.Search in Google Scholar
Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340, 358-59 (1991).Search in Google Scholar
Shanghai Xuanting Entertainment Information Technolgy Co. v. Beijing Tianhang Huitong Information Technology Co., (2015) Yuezhi Fazhu Civil Final No. 30.Search in Google Scholar
Macatee, S. B. (1993). Total Concept and Feel or Dissection: Approaches to the Misappropriation Test of Substantial Similarity. Chi-Kent Law Review, 68, 935.Search in Google Scholar
Shanghai Xuanting Entertainment Information Technology Co. v. Chengdu Jiqian Technology Co. and others, (2016) Su 03 Civil Verdict No.369.Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, K. R. (2010). Doctrine of the Dead: How Capcom v. MKR Exposes the Decreasing Fit between Modern Copyright Infringement Analysis and Modern Video Games. Chi-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 9, 141.Search in Google Scholar
Deneau, K. (2013). The Historical Development and Misplaced Justification for the Derivative Work Right. Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law, 19, 77.Search in Google Scholar