Study of a linear-physical-programming-based approach for web service selection under uncertain service quality

[1] Safari, E., Babakhani, M., Sadjadi, S.J., Shahanaghi, K., & Naboureh, K. 2015. Determining Strategy of Pricing for a Web Service with Different QoS Levels and Reservation Level Constraint. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 39, (13): 3784-3813. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Raj, R.J.R, & Sasipraba, T. 2010. Web Service Selection Based on QoS Constraints. Trendz in Information Sciences & Computing (TISC): 156-162. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Zeng, L.Z., Benatallah, B., Dumas, M., Kalagnanam, J., & Sheng, Q.Z. 2003. Quality Driven Web Services Composition. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web: 411-421. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dong, S.A.Y., & Dong, W.Q. 2009. A QoS Driven Web Service Composition Method Based on ESGA (Elitist Selection Genetic Algorithm) with an Improved Initial Population Selection Strategy. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 5, (1): 54-54. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fan, Q.J., & Kim, W. 2009. Identifying the Service Quality Factors for Web Site: A Comparison of Web Site Types. International Journal of Contents, 5, (1): 9-14. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Curbera, F., Duftler, M., Khalaf, R., Nagy, W., Mukhi, N. & Weerawarana, S. 2002. Unraveling the Web services web: an introduction to SOAP, WSDL, and UDDI. IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 86-93. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Ko, J.M., Kim, C.O., & Kwon, I.H. 2008. Quality-of-service Oriented Web Service Composition Algorithm and Planning Architecture. Journal of Systems and Software, 81, (11): 2079-2090. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Zhao, L.P., Ren, Y.Z., Li, M.C., & Sakurai, K. 2012. Flexible Service Selection with User-Specific QoS Support in Service-Oriented Architecture. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35, (3): 962-973. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wang, S., Sun, Q., & Yang, F. 2012. Quality of Service Measure Approach of Web Service for Service Selection. IET Software, 6, (2): 148-154. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Seip, C. 2015. Evaluation and Monitoring of Service Quality (Quality of Service) Illustrated using the Example of Navies Data Infrastructure Germany (MDI-DE). Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinformation, 4: 313-329. Search in Google Scholar

[11] D’Mello, D.A., & Ananthanarayana, V.S. 2010. Dynamic Selection Mechanism for Quality of Service Aware Web Services. Enterprise Information Systems, 4, (1): 23–60. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Nematzadeh, H., Motameni, H., Mohamad, R., & Nematzadeh, Z. 2014. QoS Measurement of Workflow-Based Web Service Compositions Using Colored Petri Net. The Scientific World Journal: 847930. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kim, M., Oh, B., Jung, J., & Lee, K.H. 2016. Outlier-robust Web Service Selection Based on a Probabilistic QoS Model. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 12, (2):162-181. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Xie, Q., Wu, K.G., Xu, J., Wu, C.Z., & Chen, M. 2011. Collaborative QoS Prediction for Web Services. Information-An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, (12), SI: 3905-3912. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Zheng, Z.B., Ma, H., Lyu, M.R., & King, I. 2011. QoS-Aware Web Service Recommendation by Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 4, (2): 140-152. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhang, C.S., Yin, H., & Zhang, B. 2013. A Novel Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Large Scale QoS-Based Service Selection Problem. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, (8): 1104-1116. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Ding, Z.J., Liu, J.J., Sun, Y.Q., Jiang, C.J., & Zhou, M.C. 2015. A Transaction and QoS-Aware Service Selection Approach Based on Genetic Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems, 45, (7):1035-1046. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Chhun, S., Moalla, N., & Ouzrout, Y. 2016. QoS Ontology for Service Selection and Reuse. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27, (1):187-199. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Wang, H.C., Chiu, W.P., & Wu, S.C. 2015. QoS-driven Selection of Web Service Considering Group Preference. Computer Networks-The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, 93, (P1): 111-124. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Wang, S.G., Sun, Q.B., Zou, H., & Yang, F.C. 2011. Web Service Selection Based on Adaptive Decomposition of Global QoS Constraints in Ubiquitous Environment. Journal of Internet Technology, 12, (5): 757-768. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Purohit, L. & Kumar, S. 2018. A Classification Based Web Service Selection Approach,” in IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, doi: 10.1109/TSC.2018.2805352. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Purohit, L. & Kumar, S. 2019. Web Services in the Internet of Things and Smart Cities: A Case Study on Classification Techniques. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 39-43. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Xiong, P.C., Fan, Y.S., & Zhou, M.C. 2009. Web Service Configuration Under Multiple Quality-of-Service Attributes. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 6, (2)(SI): 311-321. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Dustdar, S., & Schreiner, W. 2005. A Survey on Web Services Composition. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 1, (1): 1-30. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Messac, A. 1996. Physical Programming: Effective Optimization for Computational Design. AIAA Journal, 34, (1):149-158. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Messac, A., Gupta. S., & Akbulut, B. 1996. Linear Physical Programming: A New Approach to Multiple Objective Optimization. Transactions on Operational Research, 8, (2): 39-59. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Li, H.Y., Ma, M.X., & Zhang, W.L. 2016. Multi-objective Collaborative Optimization Using Linear Physical Programming with Dynamic Weight. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30, (2): 763-770. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Gulsun, B., Tuzkaya, G., Tuzkaya, U.R., & Onut, S. 2009. An Aggregate Production Planning Strategy Selection Methodology based on Linear Physical Programming. International Journal of Industrial Engineering-Theory Applications and Practice, 16, (2): 135-146. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Onut, S., Tuzkaya, U.R., Tuzkaya, G., & Gulsun, B. 2011. A Multi-Objective Energy Resource Allocation Model for Turkish Manufacturing Industry Using Linear Physical Programming. International Journal of Innovative Computing Information and Control, 7, (6) (SI): 3147-3169. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Ashlaghi, M.J. 2014. A New Approach to Green Supplier Selection Based on Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method and Linear Physical Programming. Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette, 21, (3): 591-597. Search in Google Scholar

[31] McAllister, C.D., Simpson, T.W., Hacker, K., Lewis, K., & Messac, A. 2005. Integrating Linear Physical Programming within Collaborative Optimization for Multi-Objective Multidisciplinary Design Optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 29, (3): 178-189. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Lai, X., Xie, M., & Tan, K.C. 2006. QFD Optimization Using Linear Physical Programming. Engineering Optimization, 38, (5): 593-607. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Pochampally, K.K., & Gupta, S.M. 2012. Use of Linear Physical Programming and Bayesian Updating for Design Issues in Reverse Logistics. International Journal of Production Research, 50, (5)(SI): 1349-1359. Search in Google Scholar

[34] ElSayed, A., Kongar, E., & Gupta, S.M. 2016. Fuzzy Linear Physical Programming for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making under Uncertainty. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 11, (1): 26-38. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Menasce, D.A. 2002. QoS Issues in Web Services. Internet Computing, IEEE, 6, (6): 72-75. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Hwang, S.Y, Hsu, C.C., & Lee, C.H. 2015. Service Selection for Web Services with Probabilistic QoS. IEEE Transactions On Services Computing, 8, (3): 467-480. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Seepersad, C.C., Hernandez, G. & Allen, J.K. 2000. A quantitative approach to determining product platform extent. Proceedings of DETC00/DAC (2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference), September 10-13, Baltimore, Maryland. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Mullur, A., Mattson, C., & Messac, A. 2003. New decision matrix based approach for concept selection using linear physical programming. In 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (p. 1446). Search in Google Scholar

[39] Kongar, E., & Gupta, S.M. (2002). Disassembly-to-order system using linear physical programming. In Conference Record 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No. 02CH37273) (pp. 312-317). IEEE. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Wang, S., Zhou, A., Yang, M., Sun, L., & Hsu, C.H. (2017). Service composition in cyber-physical-social systems. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 1-12. Search in Google Scholar