Dettagli della rivista
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2444-8656
Prima pubblicazione
01 Jan 2016
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

# Fractional differential equations in National Sports Training in Colleges and Universities

###### Accettato: 24 Sep 2021
Dettagli della rivista
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2444-8656
Prima pubblicazione
01 Jan 2016
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

To systematically understand the ability and technical mastery of football training of ethnic college students in colleges and universities, we use fractional differential equations to analyze the passing technique of college ethnic football. Research has found that establishing differential equation models in football can help us use mathematical ideas, methods, and knowledge to solve practical problems.

#### MSC 2010

Introduction

In sports training in colleges and universities, people generally equate a team's offensive ability with the striker's level of ‘one-to-one’ [1]. In the fierce competition in football, the forward is an essential factor in winning, but the passing and receiving cooperation from the backcourt and midfielders is also essential.

Combination circuit for catching the ball

Network topology has been widely used in communication networks, computer networks, and operations research. Here we use line graph analysis in network theory to discuss passing and receiving in football [2]. We first define the generalized path $L(ki)=∏i=1nki$ L({k_i}) = \prod\limits_{i = 1}^n {k_i} Here, ki represents a quantity that affects the generalized path. In a football game, we mainly consider ‘the geometric distance between two points, the speed of the ball, the accuracy of passing, the ability to receive the ball, and the defense of the passing and receiving points.’ When multiple people pass and receive the ball multiple times, L(ki) forms a distance matrix, which follows the following rules $L2(ki)=L(ki)*L(ki)L3(ki)=L2(ki)*L(ki)⋯⋯$ {L^2}({k_i}) = L({k_i})*L({k_i}){L^3}({k_i}) = {L^2}({k_i})*L({k_i}) \cdots \cdots We define $C*D=E=[ejk]m×n$ C*D = E = [{e_{jk}}{]_{m \times n}} Among them C = [cjk]m×l, D = [djk]l×n, $ejk=mincjl≠0,dlk≠0{cj1*d1k,cj2*d2k,⋯⋯cjl*dlk}$ {e_{jk}} = \mathop {\min }\limits_{{c_{jl}} \ne 0,{d_{lk}} \ne 0} \{ {c_{j1}}*{d_{1k}},{c_{j2}}*{d_{2k}}, \cdots \cdots {c_{jl}}*{d_{lk}}\} .

For example, C = [1, 2, 3, 4, 0], D = [0, 2, 1, 2, 0]T, $ejk=mincjl≠0,dlk≠0{0,2,4,6,0}$ {e_{jk}} = \mathop {\min }\limits_{{c_{jl}} \ne 0,{d_{lk}} \ne 0} \{ 0,2,4,6,0\} .

We use Figure 1 to show the generalized path diagram of the pass when attacking. P1 represents the node formed by the defender of the possession side and the goalkeeper. P2, P3 corresponds to midfielders and full-backs. P4 stands for striker. P5 refers to the goal. Then $L=[0320000313000100000100000], L2=[1jk]=L*L=[0063600042000020000000000]$ L = \left[ {\matrix{ 0 & 3 & 2 & 0 & 0 \cr 0 & 0 & 3 & 1 & 3 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr } } \right],\quad {L^2}{ = [1_{jk}}] = L*L = \left[ {\matrix{ 0 & 0 & 6 & 3 & 6 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 2 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr } } \right]

The same $L3=L2*L=[0007400005000000000000000], L4=L3*L=[0000800000000000000000000], L5=L4*L=0$ {L^3} = {L^2}*L = \left[ {\matrix{ 0 & 0 & 0 & 7 & 4 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 5 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr } } \right],\quad {L^4} = {L^3}*L = \left[ {\matrix{ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 8 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr } } \right],\quad {L^5} = {L^4}*L = 0 To find the shortest distance from Pj to Pk, we define $C⊕D=[ejk]m×n$ C \oplus D = [{e_{jk}}{]_{m \times n}} among them $C=[ajk]m×nD=[djk]m×n,ejk={0,cjk=djk=0cjk,cjk>0,djk=0djk,cc8=0,djk>0min(cjk,djk),cjk≠0djk≠0Lmin=L⊕L2⊕L3⊕L4⊕L5=[0323400313000120000100000]=[1jk]min$ \matrix{ {C = [{a_{jk}}{]_{m \times n}}D = [{d_{jk}}{]_{m \times n}},{e_{jk}} = \left\{ {\matrix{ {0,{c_{jk}} = {d_{jk}} = 0} \hfill \cr {{c_{jk}},{c_{jk}} > 0,{d_{jk}} = 0} \hfill \cr {{d_{jk}},c{c^8} = 0,{d_{jk}} > 0} \hfill \cr {\min ({c_{jk}},{d_{jk}}),{c_{jk}} \ne 0{d_{jk}} \ne 0} \hfill \cr} } \right.} \hfill \cr {{L_{\min }} = L \oplus {L^2} \oplus {L^3} \oplus {L^4} \oplus {L^5} = \left[ {\matrix{ 0 & 3 & 2 & 3 & 4 \cr 0 & 0 & 3 & 1 & 3 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 2 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \cr 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \cr } } \right] = \mathop {{{[1}_{jk}}]}\limits_{\min } } \hfill \cr } $[1jk]min$ \mathop {{{[1}_{jk}}]}\limits_{\min } represents the shortest distance from Pj to Pk. The ultimate goal of passing and receiving is to get the (best) shot. There are many factors to consider when passing the ball. A node that is geometrically connected is not necessarily a valid point. From formula (1), it can be known that any factor other than the geometric distance is zero, and the generalized path is the point of leading and receiving the ball, which is the weak point [3]. From formula (2), we can know the importance of midfielders. Because P1, P5 is constant for the stadium. The value of $[1jk]min$ \mathop {{{[1}_{jk}}]}\limits_{\min } mainly depends on the direction and size of P2, P3.

Best offensive intensity

The best-generalized path gives us the whereabouts of the ball in the pass. But how to form the best path is primarily affected by the defensive team's defensive lineup. Let us illustrate this point with a simple diagram [4]. The three U1, U2, U3 secant lines in Figure 2 below represent the three defense lines of the defender. And define $Ui=∑PkPk+1U1=5,U2=5,U3=4$ \matrix{ {{U_i} = \sum {P_k}{P_{k + 1}}} \hfill \cr {{U_1} = 5,{U_2} = 5,{U_3} = 4} \hfill \cr }

We introduce the concept of generalized attack intensity and define the following formula. The attack intensity in football refers to the attack intensity, the reliability of passing and receiving the ball, and the degree of threat to the defense [5]. $fjk↔Pjk$ {f_{jk}} \leftrightarrow {P_{jk}}

A linear model can represent the generalized attack intensity secant $minfjkU=∑fjk$ \mathop {\min }\limits_{{f_{jk}}} U = \sum {f_{jk}}

The minimum cut is equivalent to the maximum flow, so the generalized attack intensity cut is $minfjkU=∑fjk−∑fjk{U,j≠s0,j≠s,t−U,j=t$ \mathop {\min }\limits_{{f_{jk}}} U = \sum {f_{jk}} - \sum {f_{jk}}\left\{ {\matrix{ {U,j \ne s} \hfill\cr {0,j \ne s,t}\hfill \cr { - U,j = t} \hfill\cr } } \right. s, t represents a confident start and endpoint, respectively. Through the secant analysis, we know two ways to increase the attack intensity: one is to increase the attack line, and the other is to reduce the path to the attack point P5. This is the value that forms the minimum secant U3 to form the maximum attack intensity [6].

Unconstrained dynamic equations

We can write the dynamic equations of the model by the Kane method $Fj+Fj*=0$ {F_j} + F_j^* = 0

We replace the extra force acting on the system with an equal force system. Then the generalized active force Fj can be written as $Fj=∑K=115(∂Vk∂x˙jFk+∂ωk∂x˙jMk)$ {F_j} = \sum\limits_{K = 1}^{15} \left( {{{\partial {V_k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}}{F_k} + {{\partial {\omega _k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}}{M_k}} \right) Fk and Mk represent the ‘equivalent’ force and force matrix acting on the link Bk. The line of action of Fk passes through the center of the link. Gk ·Vk and ωk are respectively called the velocity and angular velocity through the point Gk in the inertial reference frame. $∂Vk∂x˙j$ {{\partial {V_k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}} and $∂ωk∂x˙j$ {{\partial {\omega _k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}} are respectively referred to as ‘change rate of position deviation’ and ‘change rate of azimuth deviation.’ Mk is $Mk=Mkext+∑Mkl$ {M_k} = M_k^{ext} + \sum M_k^l Mk is the moment produced by the external force acting on Bk. $Mkl$ M_k^l is the force applied by Bl to Bk. It is generally caused by force Bl exerted on Bk. Therefore, rewriting (14) has $Mk=Fjext+Fjint$ {M_k} = F_j^{ext} + F_j^{\mathop {{\rm{int}}}} among them $Fjext=∑K=115(∂Vk∂x˙jFk+∂ωk∂x˙jMkext)$ F_j^{ext} = \sum\limits_{K = 1}^{15} \left( {{{\partial {V_k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}}{F_k} + {{\partial {\omega _k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}}M_k^{ext}} \right) $Fjint=∑K=115(∑∂ωk∂x˙jMk)$ F_j^{\mathop {{\rm{int}}}} = \sum\limits_{K = 1}^{15} \left( {\sum {{\partial {\omega _k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}}{M_k}} \right)

Due to $∂ωk∂x˙j=ωijknoi, ∂Vk∂x˙j=υijknoi$ {{\partial {\omega _k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}} = {\omega _{ijk}}{n_{oi}},\quad {{\partial {V_k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}} = {\upsilon _{ijk}}{n_{oi}}

Equation (17) can be rewritten as $Fjext=υkjkFki+ωkjkMkiext$ F_j^{ext} = {\upsilon _{kjk}}{F_{ki}} + {\omega _{kjk}}M_{ki}^{ext} Where Fki and $Mkiext$ M_{ki}^{ext} are the components of Fk and $Mkext$ M_k^{ext} in the noi direction, respectively [7]. Let's analyze the generalized inertial force. From Eq. (14), we can get: $Fj*=∑k=115(∂Vk∂x˙jFk*+∂ωk∂x˙jMk*)$ F_j^* = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{15} \left( {{{\partial {V_k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}}F_k^* + {{\partial {\omega _k}} \over {\partial {{\dot x}_j}}}M_k^*} \right)

Among them $Fj*=−mkak=−mk(υijkx¨j+υ˙ijkx˙j)noi, Tk*=−Ik⋅ak−ωk×Ik⋅ωk$ F_j^* = - {m_k}{a_k} = - {m_k}({\upsilon _{ijk}}{\ddot x_j} + {\dot \upsilon _{ijk}}{\dot x_j}){n_{oi}},\quad T_k^* = - {I_k} \cdot {a_k} - {\omega _k} \times {I_k} \cdot {\omega _k}

The inertial dyadic Ik is given by $Ik=Imnknomnon$ {I_k} = {I_{mnk}}{n_{om}}{n_{on}}

Among them, the value of element Imnk related to nom and nmnk is related. It has the same value as nkr and nks related element $Irskk(k=1,2,3;m,n,r,s,k)$ I_{rsk}^k(k = 1,2,3;m,n,r,s,k) . O represents the origin of the reference coordinate of the inertial reference system [8]. The expression is as follows: $Imnk=nomnonnksnrskk$ {I_{mnk}} = {n_{om}}{n_{on}}{n_{ks}}n_{rsk}^k $S0Kmr=nomnkr, S0Kns=nonnks, Imnk=S0KmrS0KnsIrsk$ {S_0}{K_{mr}} = {n_{om}}{n_{kr}},\quad {S_0}{K_{ns}} = {n_{on}}{n_{ks}},\quad {I_{mnk}} = {S_0}{K_{mr}}{S_0}{K_{ns}}{I_{rsk}}

Organized $Tk*=−(Imnknomnon)[(w˙ijkx¨j+ωijkx¨j)noi]−(ωijkx˙jnoi)×Imnknomnonωijkx˙jnoiTk*=−[Imnk(ω˙njkx¨j+ωnjkx¨j)+eiqmωipkωnjkx˙px˙jIqnk]nom$ \matrix{ {T_k^* = - ({I_{mnk}}{n_{om}}{n_{on}})\left[ {\left( {{{\dot w}_{ijk}}{{\ddot x}_j} + {\omega _{ijk}}{{\ddot x}_j}} \right){n_{oi}}} \right] - \left( {{\omega _{ijk}}{{\dot x}_j}{n_{oi}}} \right) \times {I_{mnk}}{n_{om}}{n_{on}}{\omega _{ijk}}{{\dot x}_j}{n_{oi}}} \hfill \cr {T_k^* = - [{I_{mnk}}({{\dot \omega }_{njk}}{{\ddot x}_j} + {\omega _{njk}}{{\ddot x}_j}) + {e_{iqm}}{\omega _{ipk}}{\omega _{njk}}{{\dot x}_p}{{\dot x}_j}{I_{qnk}}]{n_{om}}} \hfill \cr }

Among them $Tk*=∑k=115{mkυijk(υipkx¨j+υ˙ipkx˙j)+ωijk[Iink(ωnpkx¨p+ω˙npkx˙p)+emqiωmpkωnhkωnhkx˙px˙hIqnk]}$ T_k^* = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{15} \left\{ {{m_k}{\upsilon _{ijk}}\left( {{\upsilon _{ipk}}{{\ddot x}_j} + {{\dot \upsilon }_{ipk}}{{\dot x}_j}} \right) + {\omega _{ijk}}\left[ {{I_{ink}}({\omega _{npk}}{{\ddot x}_p} + {{\dot \omega }_{npk}}{{\dot x}_p}) + {e_{mqi}}{\omega _{mpk}}{\omega _{nhk}}{\omega _{nhk}}{{\dot x}_p}{{\dot x}_h}{I_{qnk}}} \right]} \right\} i, m, n, q and p are summed from 1 to 3. Both j and h are summed from 1 to 40. The kinetic equation (14) can be expressed in the following concise form $Ajpx¨p=fj+Fjext+Fjint$ {A_{jp}}{\ddot x_p} = {f_j} + F_j^{ext} + F_j^{{\rm{int}}} Where p is summed from 1 to 40. Ajp and fj are given by $Ajp=∑k=115[mkυijkυipk+Iinkωijkωnpk]$ {A_{jp}} = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{15} \left[ {{m_k}{\upsilon _{ijk}}{\upsilon _{ipk}} + {I_{ink}}{\omega _{ijk}}{\omega _{npk}}} \right] $fj=∑k=115[mkυijkυ˙ipkx˙p+Iinkωijkω˙npkx˙p+emqiIqnkωmpkωnhkx˙px˙h]$ {f_j} = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{15} \left[ {{m_k}{\upsilon _{ijk}}{{\dot \upsilon }_{ipk}}{{\dot x}_p} + {I_{ink}}{\omega _{ijk}}{{\dot \omega }_{npk}}{{\dot x}_p} + {e_{mqi}}{I_{qnk}}{\omega _{mpk}}{\omega _{nhk}}{{\dot x}_p}{{\dot x}_h}} \right]

Equation (24) forms 40 second-order nonlinear differential equations. Use the Runge-Kutta method to find numerical solutions to these equations. We can find 40 generalized coordinates. If some equations of these generalized coordinates are known, a part of the Eq. (24) becomes an algebraic equation for finding the sum of unknown forces [9]. All the coefficients in the equation can be obtained by calculating the four coefficient matrices of ωijk, υijk, $υ˙ijkx˙j$ {\dot \upsilon _{ijk}}{\dot x_j} and $ω˙ijkx˙j$ {\dot \omega _{ijk}}{\dot x_j} . So we can solve the dynamic equation on the computer.

Constrained dynamic equations

To obtain the dynamic equation of the constraint system, we only need to multiply the left side of the dynamic equation of the original system by transposing the coefficient matrix of the constraint equation [10]. Therefore, from Eq. (24), the dynamic equation of the multi-rigid body mechanical model of the human body under constraints can be obtained: $a(Fj+Fj*)=0 aAjpx¨p=a(fj+Fjext+Fjint)$ \matrix{ {a\left( {{F_j} + F_j^*} \right) = 0} \hfill \cr {\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,a{A_{jp}}{{\ddot x}_p} = a\left( {{f_j} + F_j^{ext} + F_j^{{\rm{int}}}} \right)} \hfill \cr } Where a is the transposition of the coefficient matrix of the constraint equation. In the formula, Ajp, fj, $Fjext$ F_j^{ext} and $Fjint$ F_j^{{\rm{int}}} are determined by formulas (18–21).

Application examples

The election here is one of the ten classic World Cup events-a-goal matches between Argentina and the Netherlands. The picture is the eight sports characteristic pictures from the attack from the middle of the ball to the goal. Through image reconstruction, a panoramic view of the whole process is obtained [11]. From the reconstructed panorama, the combination line of passing and receiving for the offensive midfielder is obtained as shown in Figure 3:

According to the offensive strength, the offensive midfielder's adequate passing directions, namely, to the right and pass back. The defense of the three forwards on the offensive side is successful for the defense. Still, the defensive guards are too densely positioned to create opportunities for the proper offensive back [12]. Although a ‘6-3 situation is formed in the local area, there is unnecessary defensive overlap, resulting in insufficient defensive space. At this time, the three strikers of the offensive side are effectively blocked, and the goalkeeper's proper position is not a fatal threat to the defensive side.

Figures 4 and 5 are the characteristic pictures of the ‘back bow’ on the pole in the shooting action using the improved dynamic model and the original model [13]. It can be seen that the hip movement, which is the crucial part of the technical movement, more realistically describes the characteristics of the movement by increasing the degree of freedom.

Conclusion

The essential physical fitness and technical level of a football player are essential. It is an integral part of the technical level of the entire team. However, the most considerable charm of football is the ‘acting’ of talented players and the unpredictable results. The team's tactical style and performance are also the most attractive. Research has found that establishing differential equation models in football can help us use mathematical ideas, methods, and knowledge to solve practical problems.

Harabagiu, N. The motor training of senior volleyball players by applying the Data-Volley programme. Ştiinţa Culturii Fizice., 2019; 2(34), 108–114. HarabagiuN. The motor training of senior volleyball players by applying the Data-Volley programme Ştiinţa Culturii Fizice 2019 2 34 108 114 Search in Google Scholar

Ustaoğlu, G., Atala, M. H., & Gümüş, K. Ç. Evaluation of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Dentistry Students. Van Medical Journal., 2020; 27(2), 190–196. UstaoğluG. AtalaM. H. GümüşK. Ç. Evaluation of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Dentistry Students Van Medical Journal 2020 27 2 190 196 10.5505/vtd.2020.04875 Search in Google Scholar

Sápi, M., Domjan, A., Fehérné Kiss, A., & Pintér, S. Is kinect training superior to conventional balance training for healthy older adults to improve postural control?. Games for health journal., 2019; 8(1), 41–48. SápiM. DomjanA. Fehérné KissA. PintérS. Is kinect training superior to conventional balance training for healthy older adults to improve postural control? Games for health journal 2019 8 1 41 48 10.1089/g4h.2018.002730153062 Search in Google Scholar

Lungu, A. J., Swinkels, W., Claesen, L., Tu, P., Egger, J., & Chen, X. A review on the applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery. Expert Review of Medical Devices., 2021; 18(1), 47–62. LunguA. J. SwinkelsW. ClaesenL. TuP. EggerJ. ChenX. A review on the applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery Expert Review of Medical Devices 2021 18 1 47 62 10.1080/17434440.2021.186075033283563 Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, A., Colombaro, I., Garra, R., Garrappa, R., Polito, F., Popolizio, M., & Mainardi, F. A practical guide to Prabhakar fractional calculus. Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis., 2020; 23(1), 9–54. GiustiA. ColombaroI. GarraR. GarrappaR. PolitoF. PopolizioM. MainardiF. A practical guide to Prabhakar fractional calculus Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis 2020 23 1 9 54 10.1515/fca-2020-0002 Search in Google Scholar

Lieu Tran, T. B., Törngren, M., Nguyen, H. D., Paulen, R., Gleason, N. W., & Duong, T. H. Trends in preparing cyber-physical systems engineers. Cyber-Physical Systems., 2019; 5(2), 65–91. Lieu TranT. B. TörngrenM. NguyenH. D. PaulenR. GleasonN. W. DuongT. H. Trends in preparing cyber-physical systems engineers Cyber-Physical Systems 2019 5 2 65 91 10.1080/23335777.2019.1600034 Search in Google Scholar

Wang, C., Yang, G., Papanastasiou, G., Zhang, H., Rodrigues, J. J., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C. Industrial cyber-physical systems-based cloud IoT edge for federated heterogeneous distillation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics., 2020; 17(8), 5511–5521. WangC. YangG. PapanastasiouG. ZhangH. RodriguesJ. J. de AlbuquerqueV. H. C. Industrial cyber-physical systems-based cloud IoT edge for federated heterogeneous distillation IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2020 17 8 5511 5521 10.1109/TII.2020.3007407 Search in Google Scholar

Cumino, C., Pavignano, M., Spreafico, M. L., & Zich, U. Geometry to Build Models, Models to Visualize Geometry. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education., 2021; 7(1), 149–166. CuminoC. PavignanoM. SpreaficoM. L. ZichU. Geometry to Build Models, Models to Visualize Geometry Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education 2021 7 1 149 166 10.1007/s40751-020-00080-6 Search in Google Scholar

Koratala, A., & Bejjanki, H. Point-of-care ultrasound for the nephrologist: emphysematous pyelonephritis versus staghorn calculus. Clinical and experimental nephrology., 2019; 23(10), 1257–1258. KoratalaA. BejjankiH. Point-of-care ultrasound for the nephrologist: emphysematous pyelonephritis versus staghorn calculus Clinical and experimental nephrology 2019 23 10 1257 1258 10.1007/s10157-019-01763-031267261 Search in Google Scholar

Mishra, S. U. C. H. A. N. A., Mishra, L. N., Mishra, R. K., & Patnaik, S. R. I. K. A. N. T. A. Some applications of fractional calculus in technological development. Journal of Fractional Calculus and Applications., 2019; 10(1), 228–235. MishraS. U. C. H. A. N. A. MishraL. N. MishraR. K. PatnaikS. R. I. K. A. N. T. A. Some applications of fractional calculus in technological development Journal of Fractional Calculus and Applications 2019 10 1 228 235 Search in Google Scholar

Zjavka, L. PV power intra-day predictions using PDE models of polynomial networks based on operational calculus. IET Renewable Power Generation, 2020; 14(8), 1405–1412. ZjavkaL. PV power intra-day predictions using PDE models of polynomial networks based on operational calculus IET Renewable Power Generation 2020 14 8 1405 1412 10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.1208 Search in Google Scholar

Iglesias Martínez, M., Antonino-Daviu, J., de Córdoba, P. & Conejero, J. Higher-Order Spectral Analysis of Stray Flux Signals for Faults Detection in Induction Motors. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences., 2020;5(2) 1–14. Iglesias MartínezM. Antonino-DaviuJ. de CórdobaP. ConejeroJ. Higher-Order Spectral Analysis of Stray Flux Signals for Faults Detection in Induction Motors Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 2020 5 2 1 14 10.2478/amns.2020.1.00032 Search in Google Scholar

de Assis, R., Pazim, R., Malavazi, M., Petry, P., de Assis, L. & Venturino, E. A Mathematical Model to describe the herd behaviour considering group defense. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences., 2020; 5(1) 11–24. de AssisR. PazimR. MalavaziM. PetryP. de AssisL. VenturinoE. A Mathematical Model to describe the herd behaviour considering group defense Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 2020 5 1 11 24 10.2478/amns.2020.1.00002 Search in Google Scholar

• #### Higher Education Agglomeration Promoting Innovation and Entrepreneurship Based on Spatial Dubin Model

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD