A Model Study Based on Social Network Relational Dimensions and Structural Dimensions

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4	Model 5	Model 6
ComplementarityComplementarity		0.552^*** (3.322)	0.555^*** (3.192)	0.568^*** (3.309)	0.551^*** (3.310)	0.578^*** (3.223)
Group tie density Complementarity			0.476^*** (4.215)			0.513^*** (4.496)
Network status heterogeneity Complementarity				−0.278^*** (−2.824)		−0.331^*** (−3.176)
Network status-based heterogeneity					−0.007 (−0.065)	−0.029 (−0.233)
Group tie density	0.784 (1.501)	0.753 (1.426)	0.853 (1.372)	0.707 (1.330)	0.754 (1.427)	0.880 (1.409)
Network status heterogeneity	−0.756 (−1.417)	−0.835 (−1.537)	−0.806 (−1.466)	−0.871 (−1.567)	−0.836 (−1.538)	−0.936 (−1.637)
Network status-based heterogeneity	−4.925^*** (−4.623)	−5.215^*** (−4.775)	−5.534^*** (−4.966)	−5.394^*** (−4.875)	−5.216^*** (−4.777)	−5.820^*** (−5.099)
Stage	0.482^*** (4.053)	0.722^*** (4.025)	0.801^*** (4.021)	0.792^*** (4.019)	0.759^*** (4.006)	0.901^*** (4.009)
Size	0.210^** (2.371)	−0.187 (−1.221)	−0.209 (−1.261)	−0.207 (−1.284)	−0.188 (−1.222)	−0.239 (−1.409)
Unsingle	−0.250 (−1.208)	−0.217 (−1.030)	−0.274 (−1.288)	−0.175 (−0.826)	−0.216 (−1.026)	−0.227 (−1.061)
Resource	0.000 (0.011)	−0.002 (−0.074)	−0.001 (−0.047)	−0.004 (−0.181)	−0.002 (−0.075)	−0.004 (−0.194)
Age	−0.003 (−1.351)	−0.003 (−1.537)	−0.004^* (−1.669)	−0.003 (−1.595)	−0.003 (−1.537)	−0.004^* (−1.787)
Proportion of foreign members	−0.572 (−1.449)	−0.720^* (−1.792)	−0.875^** (−2.102)	−0.727^* (−1.803)	−0.719^* (−1.790)	−0.883^** (−2.109)
Average geographical proximity	0.114 (0.345)	0.034 (0.103)	0.058 (0.171)	0.029 (0.086)	0.033 (0.099)	0.057 (0.166)
Industry	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Intercept	1.970^** (2.335)	3.753^*** (3.667)	3.971^*** (3.756)	3.942^*** (3.729)	3.755^*** (3.665)	4.291^*** (3.926)
N	651	651	651	651	651	651

Correlation analysis

	Variable	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1	Performance	1
2	Complementarity	0.132^*	1
3	Group tie density	0.03	0.012	1
4	Network status heterogeneity	−0.010^*	0.043	0.037	1
5	Network status-based fault	−0.186^*	−0.002	0.004	0.134^*	1
6	Stage	−0.011	0.091^*	−0.182^*	0.028	−0.054	1
7	Size	0.085^*	0.524^*	−0.008	0.025	−0.016	0.105^*	1
8	Unsingle	−0.037	0.035	0.154^*	−0.033	0.076^*	−0.111^*	0.074	1
9	Resource	−0.069	0.196^*	0.115^*	0.096^*	0.019	−0.03	0.190^*	−0.017	1
11	Age	−0.092^*	−0.051	0.168^*	0.089^*	−0.014	−0.221^*	−0.089^*	0.087^*	0.538^*	1
12	Proportion of foreign members	−0.019	−0.003	0.250^*	0.025	−0.03	−0.268^*	−0.06	0.057	−0.009	0.190^*	1
13	Average geographical proximity	0.023	−0.083^*	−0.073	−0.057	0.007	0.009	−0.124^*	−0.009	−0.062	−0.046	−0.232^*	1

Descriptive statistics

	Variable	Mean	SD	Min	Max
1	Performance	0.276	0.448	0	1
2	Complementarity	0.729	0.094	0.667	0.978
3	Group tie density	0.092	0.191	0	1
4	Network status heterogeneity	0.576	0.170	0	0.914
5	Network status-based fault	0.240	0.101	0	0.563
6	Stage	3.095	0.686	1	4
7	Size	3.641	1.109	3	10
8	Unsingle	0.656	0.475	0	1
9	Resource	10.40	11.34	0	70
10	Age	5.779	8.120	0	53
11	Proportion of foreign members	0.246	0.300	0	1
12	Average geographical proximity	0.279	0.300	0	1

eISSN:: 2444-8656
Lingua:: Inglese

Frequenza di pubblicazione:: Volume Open
Argomenti della rivista:: Life Sciences, other, Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, General Mathematics, Physics

Feed RSS della rivista

A Model Study Based on Social Network Relational Dimensions and Structural Dimensions

Pubblicato online: 08 mag 2020

Pagine: 121 - 128

Ricevuto: 17 mar 2020

Accettato: 03 apr 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2020.2.00005

Parole chiavecomplementarity, network status heterogeneity, network status-based faults, group tie density

© 2020 Yunjing Jiao, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Probit regression results

Correlation analysis

Descriptive statistics

Parole chiave
complementarity, network status heterogeneity, network status-based faults, group tie density