Big data identification and calculation model construction of civil abuse of right of action behavior based on the constraints of laws and regulations

[1] Lahav, A. D. (2018). A Proposal to End Discovery Abuse. Vand. L. Rev., 71, 2037. Lahav A. D. (2018). A Proposal to End Discovery Abuse. Vand. L. Rev., 71, 2037.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Paraschiv, R. L. (2019). Abuse of Rights and Abuse of Power. Conferința Internațională de Drept, Studii Europene și Relații Internaționale, 7(VII), 413-422. Paraschiv R. L. (2019). Abuse of Rights and Abuse of Power. Conferința Internațională de Drept, Studii Europene și Relații Internaționale, 7(VII), 413-422.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Clark, E. (2019). Enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Remedying” Abusive” Litigation While Strengthening Disability Rights. Wash. & Lee J. Civ. Rts. & Soc. Just., 26, 689. Clark E. (2019). Enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Remedying” Abusive” Litigation While Strengthening Disability Rights. Wash. & Lee J. Civ. Rts. & Soc. Just., 26, 689.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Lahav, A. (2017). In praise of litigation. Oxford University Press. Lahav A. (2017). In praise of litigation. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Rakocevic, M. V. (2017). Compensation for damage caused by abuse of procedural rights in civil litigation. Zbornik Radova, 51, 203. Rakocevic M. V. (2017). Compensation for damage caused by abuse of procedural rights in civil litigation. Zbornik Radova, 51, 203.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Cohen, L., Golden, J. M., Gurun, U. G., & Kominers, S. D. (2017). Troll check: A proposal for administrative review of patent litigation. BUL Rev., 97, 1775. CohenL. GoldenJ. M. GurunU. G. & Kominers S. D. (2017). Troll check: A proposal for administrative review of patent litigation. BUL Rev., 97, 1775.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Fahimi, A., & Hasanzadeh, M. (2023). Abuse of Rights in Civil Proceedings in Iran and France. Comparative law Research Quarterly, 27(1), 133-157. FahimiA. & Hasanzadeh M. (2023). Abuse of Rights in Civil Proceedings in Iran and France. Comparative law Research Quarterly, 27(1), 133-157.Search in Google Scholar

[8] McLemore, A. (2021). Stalking by Way of the Courts: Tennessee’s Abusive Civil Action Law and Why All States Should Adopt a Similar Approach to Abusive Litigation in the Family Law Context. UCLA Women’s LJ, 28, 333. McLemore A. (2021). Stalking by Way of the Courts: Tennessee’s Abusive Civil Action Law and Why All States Should Adopt a Similar Approach to Abusive Litigation in the Family Law Context. UCLA Women’s LJ, 28, 333.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Marchenko, A. (2019). Abuse of a Procedural Right in Civil Proceedings: Qualification Issues. Russ. Jurid. J., 128. Marchenko A. (2019). Abuse of a Procedural Right in Civil Proceedings: Qualification Issues. Russ. Jurid. J., 128.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Beeman, A. (2022). The need for more states to adopt specific legislation addressing abusive use of litigation in intimate partner violence. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 20(3), 13. Beeman A. (2022). The need for more states to adopt specific legislation addressing abusive use of litigation in intimate partner violence. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 20(3), 13.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Hloviuk, I., Drozdov, O., Zavtur, V., & Drozdova, O. (2022). Abuse of Procedural Rights in Criminal Proceedings: The Issue of the Concept of Equality. Law Ukr.: Legal J., 90. HloviukI. DrozdovO. ZavturV. & Drozdova O. (2022). Abuse of Procedural Rights in Criminal Proceedings: The Issue of the Concept of Equality. Law Ukr.: Legal J., 90.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Brescia, R. H. (2024). Insurrection-Proofing the Courts: Judicial Tools to Protect the Legal System from Litigation Abuse in the Wake of the 2024 Election. In SMU Law Review Forum (Vol. 78, No. 1, p. 244). Brescia R. H. (2024). Insurrection-Proofing the Courts: Judicial Tools to Protect the Legal System from Litigation Abuse in the Wake of the 2024 Election. In SMU Law Review Forum (Vol. 78, No. 1, p. 244).Search in Google Scholar

[13] Tkachuk, A. (2017). Abuse of Procedural Rights under the Draft New Edition of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine: Notions, Indications, Ways of Counteraction. Law Ukr.: Legal J., 205. Tkachuk A. (2017). Abuse of Procedural Rights under the Draft New Edition of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine: Notions, Indications, Ways of Counteraction. Law Ukr.: Legal J., 205.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Saffren, J., & Hyman, E. M. (2023). Judicial Approaches to Curb Litigation Abuse. Family & Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly, 15(4). SaffrenJ. & Hyman E. M. (2023). Judicial Approaches to Curb Litigation Abuse. Family & Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly, 15(4).Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hlushchenko, S., & Soloviova, A. (2018). On the Question of the International Practice of the EU Countries in the Fight against Abuse of Procedural Rights in the Enforcement Proceedings. Jurid. Sci., 134. HlushchenkoS. & Soloviova A. (2018). On the Question of the International Practice of the EU Countries in the Fight against Abuse of Procedural Rights in the Enforcement Proceedings. Jurid. Sci., 134.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Gutowski, E. R., & Goodman, L. A. (2023). Coercive control in the courtroom: The legal abuse scale (LAS). Journal of family violence, 38(3), 527-542. GutowskiE. R. & Goodman L. A. (2023). Coercive control in the courtroom: The legal abuse scale (LAS). Journal of family violence, 38(3), 527-542.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kuzmenko, K. (2022). The State of Scientific Development of the Problem of Abuse of Civil Procedural Rights. Legal Horizons, 92. Kuzmenko K. (2022). The State of Scientific Development of the Problem of Abuse of Civil Procedural Rights. Legal Horizons, 92.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Aristova, E. (2021). The future of tort litigation against transnational corporations in the English courts: Is forum [non] conveniens back?. Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(3), 399-422. Aristova E. (2021). The future of tort litigation against transnational corporations in the English courts: Is forum [non] conveniens back?. Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(3), 399-422.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Gaillard, E. (2017). Abuse of process in international arbitration. ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, 32(1), 17-37. Gaillard E. (2017). Abuse of process in international arbitration. ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, 32(1), 17-37.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Chung, C. Y., Kim, I., Rabarison, M. K., To, T. Y., & Wu, E. (2020). Shareholder litigation rights and corporate acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 62, 101599. ChungC. Y. KimI. RabarisonM. K. ToT. Y. & Wu E. (2020). Shareholder litigation rights and corporate acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 62, 101599.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Pawaiya, S., & Jain, N. (2018). Public Interest Litigation: Misuse and Impact of Judicial Intervention on Governance. Supremo Amicus, 3, 584. PawaiyaS. & Jain N. (2018). Public Interest Litigation: Misuse and Impact of Judicial Intervention on Governance. Supremo Amicus, 3, 584.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Wettstein, F. (2017). Beyond guilty verdicts: Human rights litigation and its impact on corporations’ human rights policies. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 545-562. Schrempf-StirlingJ. & Wettstein F. (2017). Beyond guilty verdicts: Human rights litigation and its impact on corporations’ human rights policies. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 545-562Search in Google Scholar