Accesso libero

Relevance recommendation method based on multimedia technology-assisted English teaching design and teaching content

  
27 feb 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Figure 1.

Tower of Experience
Tower of Experience

Figure 2.

Audio processing flow chart
Audio processing flow chart

Figure 3.

Interactive courseware production flow chart
Interactive courseware production flow chart

Figure 4.

encoding flow chart of LT
encoding flow chart of LT

Figure 5.

Student-Specific Referral Flowchart
Student-Specific Referral Flowchart

Figure 6.

Number of encoded packets and packet loss in video transmission
Number of encoded packets and packet loss in video transmission

Figure 7.

Comparison of the original model and the improved model between the two sequences
Comparison of the original model and the improved model between the two sequences

Figure 8.

Comparison of video performance of two sequences under the algorithm
Comparison of video performance of two sequences under the algorithm

Figure 9.

Image quality evaluation comparison chart
Image quality evaluation comparison chart

Figure 10.

The situation of students acquiring enowledge outside the classroom
The situation of students acquiring enowledge outside the classroom

Figure 11.

Comparison of experimental group and control group
Comparison of experimental group and control group

Figure 12.

Comparison of traditional content teaching and recommended content teaching in class A
Comparison of traditional content teaching and recommended content teaching in class A

Figure 13.

Comparison of traditional content teaching and recommended content teaching in grade
Comparison of traditional content teaching and recommended content teaching in grade

Table of ways for students to acquire knowledge outside the classroom

method frequency Percentage (%)
teaching materials 160 30
extracurricular books 55 10
television 45 9
Micro video 170 32
broadcast 30 6
other 68 13
total 528 100

Image quality evaluation comparison table

method UEP-Raptor EEP-Raptor
PSNR(1) SSIM(1) PSNR(2) SSIM(2)
1 32.98 0.91 9.08 0.27
2 32.87 0.89 24.71 0.85
3 33.11 0.90 29.57 0.86
4 32.58 0.90 5.56 0.24
5 31.33 0.89 27.38 0.73

Number of encoded packets and packet loss rate in video transmission

Packet loss rate (%) 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Direct connection without coding 67 107 160 214 296 403 472
Number of encoding packages 100 16 15 13 33 51 74 94
Number of encoding packages 105 13 16 13 12 15 18 23
Number of encoding packages 110 15 13 14 14 14 13 14
Number of encoding packages 115 14 14 15 15 13 17 15

Slope search algorithm for video distribution performance comparison table

SNR (dB) Target rate (kbps) Actual rate (kpds) PSNR-Y PSNR-U PSNR-V average PSNR
CITY 1.5(1) 1000 995.4 35.3 42.6 44.2 37.9
1.5(1) 1500 1499.4 36.8 43.8 45.3 39.4
2(1) 450 430.2 32.1 41.1 42.8 35.4
2(1) 1000 1008 35.6 42.9 44.5 38.3
2(1) 1500 1452.7 36.9 43.8 45.3 39.5
SOCCER 1.5(2) 1000 981 35.1 42.3 43.6 37.6
1.5(2) 1500 1468.8 36.5 43.5 44.8 39.1
2(2) 450 450 32.6 40.3 41.6 35.4
2(2) 1000 1002.6 35.2 42.5 43.8 37.8
2(2) 1500 1427.4 36.7 43.5 44.8 39.2

Comparison table of experimental group and control group

group number of people The average score Excellent rate (%) Pass rate (%) Low score rate (%) standard deviation standard error of the mean
test group 50 75.6 32.5 95 5 10.2 1.6
control group 50 69.8 12.5 87.5 12.5 8.2 1.3

Comparison between the two-sequence L W-EZEP model and its improved model

PSNR-Y PSNR-U PSNR-V average PSNR
CITY sequence LW-EZEP model 33.52 41.75 43.46 34.55
improved model 34.34 42.21 43.89 37.24
SOCCER sequence LW-EZEP model 33.83 41.19 42.45 36.51
improved model 34.21 41.76 43.02 36.95
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
1 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Scienze biologiche, Scienze della vita, altro, Matematica, Matematica applicata, Matematica generale, Fisica, Fisica, altro