Research on data visualisation strategies for online information dissemination based on user experience
03 feb 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 03 feb 2025
Ricevuto: 23 set 2024
Accettato: 31 dic 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0031
Parole chiave
© 2025 Xiong Wei, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

The linear regression analysis of recognition is (n= 120)
Constant | Color collocation | Sign mark | Dynamic effect | Chart type | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonnormal coefficient | B | 3.413 | 1.333 | 0.663 | 0.295 | -0.099 |
S.E. | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.104 | 0.3 | 0.135 | |
Normal factor | Beta | -- | 0.491 | 0.488 | 0.052 | -0.07 |
t | 10.632 | 6.593 | 5.707 | 1.003 | -0.715 | |
P | -0.000** | -0.000** | -0.000** | 0.379 | 0.54 | |
VIF | -- | 1.103 | 1.335 | 1.391 | 1.077 | |
R2 | 0.387 | |||||
Adjust R2 | 0.364 | |||||
F | F | (4,127)=17.856,p=0.000 |
The Welch variance analysis result of the symbol tag variable
Color collocation | Welch F | P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.0(n=42) | 1.0(n=78) | 2.0(n=42) | |||
Awareness | 4.28 | 3.64 | 5.42 | 39.58 | 0.000** |
Memory degree | 3.97 | 2.58 | 5.19 | 85.363 | 0.000** |
Pearson correlation analysis
Awareness | Memory degree | ||
---|---|---|---|
Sign mark | Correlation coefficient | 0.427** | 0.368** |
p | 0 | 0 | |
Color collocation | Correlation coefficient | ** | 0.166 |
p | 0 | 0.167 | |
Dynamic effect | Correlation coefficient | -0.235* | -0.098 |
p | -0.015 | 0.477 | |
Chart type | Correlation coefficient | -0.055 | -0.096 |
p | 0.671 | 0.406 |
The total score value is analyzed by m estimation
Gender | Huber m estimates a | Tugki double right b | Hampel m estimation c | Andrew wave d | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Awareness | Male | 9.42 | 9.47 | 9.53 | 9.55 |
Female | 9.58 | 9.61 | 9.65 | 9.7 | |
Memory degree | Male | 7.08 | 6.99 | 6.98 | 6.96 |
Female | 7.7 | 7.64 | 7.69 | 7.69 |
Two pairs of comparison between the time of the task
Mean difference | 95% confidence interval | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Information | Alarm mode(I) | Alarm mode(J) | (I-J) | S.E. | Sig. | Low | Up |
2 term | Pie | Line | 1.528 | 1.783 | 0.837 | -2.973 | 6.076 |
Bar | 1.059 | 1.783 | 0.968 | -3.48 | 5.58 | ||
Line | Pie | -1.557 | 1.783 | 0.819 | -6.046 | 2.968 | |
Bar | -0.481 | 1.783 | 1.066 | -5.003 | 4.055 | ||
Bar | Pie | -1.039 | 1.783 | 0.98 | -5.565 | 3.456 | |
Line | 0.495 | 1.783 | 1.054 | -4.046 | 5.013 | ||
4 term | Pie | Line | 5.282 | 1.783 | 0.007 | 0.745 | 9.813 |
Bar | 4.679 | 1.783 | 0.04 | 0.137 | 9.205 | ||
Line | Pie | -5.302 | 1.783 | 0.053 | -9.81 | -0.732 | |
Bar | -0.559 | 1.783 | 1.018 | -5.1 | 3.958 | ||
Bar | Pie | -4.699 | 1.783 | 0.034 | -9.233 | -0.153 | |
Line | 0.57 | 1.783 | 1.052 | -3.965 | 5.13 | ||
8 term | Pie | Line | 13.634 | 1.783 | 0.024 | 9.105 | 18.175 |
Bar | 8.224 | 1.783 | -0.021 | 3.698 | 12.746 | ||
Line | Pie | -13.63 | 1.783 | -0.012 | -18.159 | -9.12 | |
Bar | -5.408 | 1.783 | 0.02 | -9.994 | -0.884 | ||
Bar | Pie | -8.239 | 1.783 | -0.003 | -12.753 | -3.677 | |
Line | 5.44 | 1.783 | 0.036 | 0.887 | 9.987 |
The two pairs of the task load index are compared
Mean difference | 95% confidence interval | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alarm mode(I) | Alarm mode(J) | (I-J) | S.E. | Sig. | Lower limit | Upper limit |
Pie chart | Line diagram | 1.555 | 0.473 | 0.014 | 0.546 | 2.577 |
Bar chart | -0.282 | 0.473 | -0.001 | 0.264 | 2.303 | |
Line diagram | Pie chart | -1.574 | 0.473 | -0.013 | -2.574 | -0.58 |
Bar chart | 0.246 | 0.473 | 0.649 | -1.268 | -0.273 | |
Bar chart | Pie chart | -1.314 | 0.473 | 0.012 | -2.342 | 5.477 |
Line diagram | 0.259 | 0.473 | 0.616 | -0.738 | 1.297 |
The two pairs of the task error are compared
Mean difference | 95% confidence interval | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Information | Alarm mode(I) | Alarm mode(J) | (I-J) | S.E. | Sig. | Low | Up |
2 term | Pie | Line | -0.034 | 0.109 | 0.995 | -0.283 | 0.237 |
Bar | -0.021 | 0.109 | 1.001 | -0.342 | 0.202 | ||
Line | Pie | 0.04 | 0.109 | 1.049 | -0.209 | 0.313 | |
Bar | -0.017 | 0.109 | 1.035 | -0.322 | 0.25 | ||
Bar | Pie | 0.045 | 0.109 | 0.976 | -0.187 | 0.338 | |
Line | 0 | 0.109 | 1.052 | -0.211 | 0.314 | ||
4 term | Pie | Line | -0.54 | 0.109 | -0.028 | -0.863 | -0.298 |
Bar | -0.26 | 0.109 | 0.043 | -0.526 | -0.009 | ||
Line | Pie | 0.56 | 0.109 | -0.036 | 0.335 | 0.824 | |
Bar | -0.316 | 0.109 | 0.003 | 0.028 | 0.535 | ||
Bar | Pie | 0.286 | 0.109 | 0.047 | -0.013 | 0.58 | |
Line | 0.323 | 0.109 | 0.047 | -0.562 | 0.005 | ||
8 term | Pie | Line | 0.349 | 0.109 | -0.015 | 0.069 | 0.61 |
Bar | 0.736 | 0.109 | 0.028 | 0.415 | 0.945 | ||
Line | Pie | -0.374 | 0.109 | -0.035 | -0.632 | -0.076 | |
Bar | 0.344 | 0.109 | -0.007 | 0.101 | 0.596 | ||
Bar | Pie | -0.699 | 0.109 | 0 | -0.979 | -0.438 | |
Line | -0.385 | 0.109 | -0.035 | -0.619 | -0.1 |
Test analysis of color matching variables
Color collocation | t | P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
0.0(n=42) | 1.0(n=78) | |||
Awareness | 3.73 | 4.95 | -5.237 | 0.000** |
Memory degree | 3.65 | 4.09 | -1.921 | 0.056 |
The linear regression analysis of memory (n= 120)
Constant | Color collocation | Sign mark | Dynamic effect | Chart type | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonnormal coefficient | B | 3.576 | 0.48 | 0.674 | 0.534 | -0.156 |
S.E. | 0.418 | 0.235 | 0.144 | 0.357 | 0.173 | |
Normal factor | Beta | -- | 0.13 | 0.498 | 0.185 | -0.094 |
t | 9.277 | 1.986 | 4.836 | 1.725 | -0.946 | |
P | 0.000** | 0.076 | 0.000** | 0.115 | 0.398 | |
VIF | -- | 1.064 | 1.356 | 1.386 | 1.03 | |
R2 | 0.181 | |||||
Adjust R2 | 0.152 | |||||
F | F | (4,123)=6.134,p=0.000 |