Regression analysis of the effect of social support on rural teachers’ willingness to stay in the profession

[1] Yao, D., & Deng, X. (2020). Teaching teacher recommendation method based on fuzzy clustering and latent factor model. IEEE Access, 8, 210868-210885. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Sena, A., & Howard, M. (2020). Quantifying teaching behavior in robot learning from demonstration. The International journal of robotics research, 39(1), 54-72. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Roberto, M. M., Vanessa, E., Katerina, M., Antonette, S., Gloria, F. N., & Jurgen, S., et al. (2022). Moodoo the tracker: spatial classroom analytics for characterising teachers’ pedagogical approaches. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Christoph, Kulgemeyer, Josef, & Riese. (2018). From professional knowledge to professional performance: the impact of ck and pck on teaching quality in explaining situations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Romero-Rodriguez, J. M., Aznar-Diaz, I., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., & Gomez-Garcia, G. (2020). Mobile learning in higher education: structural equation model for good teaching practices. IEEE Access, PP(99), 1-1. Search in Google Scholar

[6] A, I. K. R. H., & B, O. E. H. (2018). Students’ evaluation of digital information: the role teachers play and factors that influence variability in teacher behaviour. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 56-63. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Wu, D., Chen, J., Deng, W., Wei, Y., & Wei, Y. (2020). The recognition of teacher behavior based on multimodal information fusion. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020(1), 1-8. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Silva, W. A. F., Steinmacher, I., & Conte, T. (2019). Students’ and instructors’ perceptions of five different active learning strategies used to teach software modeling. IEEE Access, PP(99). Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hegarty, B. (2019). A teacher’s influence on student engagement: using smartphones for creating vocational assessment eportfolios. Journal of Information Technology Research, 18, 113-159. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Hartikainen, S., Pylvs, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2022). Engineering students’ perceptions of teaching: teacher-created atmosphere and teaching procedures as triggers of student emotions. European journal of engineering education. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Keuning, T., & Geel, M. V. (2021). Differentiated teaching with adaptive learning systems and teacher dashboards: the teacher still matters most. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, PP(99), 1-1. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Ismailova, Z. K., Daminov, O., Tulayev, B., Khimmataliev, D., & Khakimov, J. (2020). Use of the art of management in improving the teaching skills and pedagogical techniques of the modern teacher. Solid State Technology, 63(2), 258-267. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Rahman, A., Shah, M. A. R., & Chowdhury, S. H. (2018). Lecture capture use in engineering education: influence of students’ social and behavioral factors and teachers’ perceptions. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(3), 500-508. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Sugandi, L., & Kurniawan, Y. (2018). The influence of information technology on the information and service quality for the teaching and learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wang, X., Mu, S., Tang, D., Wen, H., Zhou, Y., & Dong, J. (2021). Research on the influence of instructor image on the learning effect of conceptual learning videos. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning. Search in Google Scholar