This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Stahl, Bernd CarstenRainey, StephenHarris, EmmaFothergill, B. Tyr. (2018). The role of ethics in data governance of large neuro-ict projects. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association :, 25(8).Search in Google Scholar
Gasco-Hernandez, M., Jimenez-Gomez, C. E., Markovi, M., & Gostoji, S. (2020). Open judicial data: a comparative analysis:. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 295-314.Search in Google Scholar
Badas, A. (2019). The applied legitimacy index: a new approach to measuring judicial legitimacy. Social Science Quarterly, 100(5).Search in Google Scholar
Biehl, J., Socal, M. P., Gauri, V., Diniz, D., & Amon, J. J. (2018). Judicialization 2.0: understanding right-to-health litigation in real time. Global Public Health, 14(1), 1-10.Search in Google Scholar
Yates, J., Whitford, A. B., & Brown, D. (2018). Perceptions of the rule of law: evidence on the impact of judicial insulation*. Social ence Quarterly, 100.Search in Google Scholar
Pesta, G., Blomberg, T. G., Casey, W., & Copp, J. E. (2022). Pretrial risk assessment instruments in practice: the role of judicial discretion in pretrial reform. Criminology & Public Policy.Search in Google Scholar
Helland, E. (2019). The role of ideology in judicial evaluations of experts. Journal of Law and Economics, 62.Search in Google Scholar
Abraham, R., Schneider, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2019). Data governance: a conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49(Dec.), 424-438.Search in Google Scholar
Liakh, O. (2021). Accountability through sustainability data governance: reconfiguring reporting to better account for the digital acceleration. Sustainability, 13.Search in Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D., & Lollo, N. (2021). Incentivizing environmental improvements in supply chains through data-driven governance. California management review(1), 64.Search in Google Scholar