[Apkarian, P., Gahinet, P. and Becker, G. (1995). Self-scheduled ℋ∞ control of linear parameter-varying systems: A design example, Automatica31(9): 1251–1261.10.1016/0005-1098(95)00038-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Apkarian, P. and Tuan, H.D. (2000). Parameterized LMIs in control theory, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization38(4): 1241–1264.10.1137/S036301299732612X]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyd, S., El Ghaoui, L., Feron, E. and Balakrishnan, V. (1994). Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.10.1137/1.9781611970777]Search in Google Scholar
[Chilali, M. and Gahinet, P. (1996). ℋ∞ design with pole placement constraints: An LMI approach, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control41(3): 358–367.10.1109/9.486637]Search in Google Scholar
[Chitraganti, S., Tóth, R., Meskin, N. and Mohammadpour, J. (2017). Stochastic model predictive tracking of piecewise constant references for LPV systems, IET Control Theory & Applications11(12): 1862–1872.10.1049/iet-cta.2016.0629]Search in Google Scholar
[Curran, P.F. (2009). On a variation of the Gershgorin circle theorem with applications to stability theory, IET Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC 2009), Dublin, Ireland, pp. 1–5.]Search in Google Scholar
[El-Sakkary, A. (1985). The gap metric: Robustness of stabilization of feedback systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control30(3): 240–247.10.1109/TAC.1985.1103926]Search in Google Scholar
[Fergani, S., Menhour, L., Sename, O., Dugard, L. and D’Andréa-Novel, B. (2017). Integrated vehicle control through the coordination of longitudinal/lateral and vertical dynamics controllers: Flatness and LPV/ℋ∞-based design, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control27(18): 4992–5007.10.1002/rnc.3846]Search in Google Scholar
[Fleischmann, S., Theodoulis, S., Laroche, E., Wallner, E. and Harcaut, J.-P. (2016). A systematic LPV/LFR modelling approach optimized for linearised gain scheduling control synthesis, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, p. 1921.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gahinet, P., Apkarian, P. and Chilali, M. (1996). Affine parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions and real parametric uncertainty, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control41(3): 436–442.10.1109/9.486646]Search in Google Scholar
[Ho, W.K., Lee, T.H., Xu, W., Zhou, J.R. and Tay, E.B. (2000). The direct Nyquist array design of PID controllers, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics47(1): 175–185.10.1109/41.824140]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffmann, C. and Werner, H. (2015). A survey of linear parameter-varying control applications validated by experiments or high-fidelity simulations, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology23(2): 416–433.10.1109/TCST.2014.2327584]Search in Google Scholar
[Inthamoussou, F.A., Bianchi, F.D., De Battista, H. and Mantz, R.J. (2014). LPV wind turbine control with anti-windup features covering the complete wind speed range, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion29(1): 259–266.10.1109/TEC.2013.2294212]Search in Google Scholar
[Jabali, M. B.A. and Kazemi, M.H. (2017). A new LPV modeling approach using PCA-based parameter set mapping to design a PSS, Journal of Advanced Research8(1): 23–32.10.1016/j.jare.2016.10.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Kwiatkowski, A., Boll, M.-T. and Werner, H. (2006). Automated generation and assessment of affine LPV models, 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 6690–6695.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kwiatkowski, A. and Werner, H. (2008). PCA-based parameter set mappings for LPV models with fewer parameters and less overbounding, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology16(4): 781–788.10.1109/TCST.2007.903094]Search in Google Scholar
[Lofberg, J. (2004). YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB, IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control Systems Design, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 284–289.]Search in Google Scholar
[López-Estrada, F.-R., Ponsart, J.-C., Astorga-Zaragoza, C.-M., Camas-Anzueto, J.-L. and Theilliol, D. (2015). Robust sensor fault estimation for descriptor-LPV systems with unmeasurable gain scheduling functions: Application to an anaerobic bioreactor, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science25(2): 233–244, DOI: 10.1515/amcs-2015-0018.10.1515/amcs-2015-0018]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Luspay, T., Péni, T., Gőzse, I., Szabó, Z. and Vanek, B. (2018). Model reduction for LPV systems based on approximate modal decomposition, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering113(6): 891–909.10.1002/nme.5692]Search in Google Scholar
[Marcos, A. and Balas, G.J. (2004). Development of linear-parameter-varying models for aircraft, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics27(2): 218–228.10.2514/1.9165]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohammadpour, J. and Scherer, C.W. (2012). Control of Linear Parameter Varying Systems with Applications, Springer, New York, NY.10.1007/978-1-4614-1833-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Montagner, V., Oliveira, R., Leite, V.J. and Peres, P.L.D. (2005). LMI approach for ℋ∞ linear parameter-varying state feedback control, IEE Proceedings: Control Theory and Applications152(2): 195–201.10.1049/ip-cta:20045117]Search in Google Scholar
[Nguyen, A.-T., Chevrel, P. and Claveau, F. (2018). Gain-scheduled static output feedback control for saturated LPV systems with bounded parameter variations, Automatica89: 420–424.10.1016/j.automatica.2017.12.027]Search in Google Scholar
[Packard, A. (1994). Gain scheduling via linear fractional transformations, Systems & Control Letters22(2): 79–92.10.1016/0167-6911(94)90102-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Pemmaraju, S. and Skiena, S. (2003). Computational Discrete Mathematics: Combinatorics and Graph Theory with Mathematica, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.10.1017/CBO9781139164849]Search in Google Scholar
[Quarteroni, A., Sacco, R. and Saleri, F. (2010). Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 37, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rahideh, A. and Shaheed, M. (2007). Mathematical dynamic modelling of a twin-rotor multiple input-multiple output system, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering221(1): 89–101.10.1243/09596518JSCE292]Search in Google Scholar
[Rizvi, S. Z., Mohammadpour, J., Tóth, R. and Meskin, N. (2016). A kernel-based PCA approach to model reduction of linear parameter-varying systems, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology24(5): 1883–1891.10.1109/TCST.2016.2517126]Search in Google Scholar
[Rotondo, D. (2017). Advances in Gain-Scheduling and Fault Tolerant Control Techniques, Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-62902-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Rotondo, D., Nejjari, F. and Puig, V. (2013). Quasi-LPV modeling, identification and control of a twin rotor MIMO system, Control Engineering Practice21(6): 829–846.10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Rotondo, D., Nejjari, F. and Puig, V. (2014). Robust state-feedback control of uncertain LPV systems: An LMI-based approach, Journal of the Franklin Institute351(5): 2781–2803.10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.01.018]Search in Google Scholar
[Rotondo, D., Puig, V., Nejjari, F. and Romera, J. (2015a). A fault-hiding approach for the switching quasi-LPV fault-tolerant control of a four-wheeled omnidirectional mobile robot, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics62(6): 3932–3944.10.1109/TIE.2014.2367002]Search in Google Scholar
[Rotondo, D., Puig, V., Nejjari, F. and Witczak, M. (2015b). Automated generation and comparison of Takagi–Sugeno and polytopic quasi-LPV models, Fuzzy Sets and Systems27(C): 44–64.10.1016/j.fss.2015.02.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Rugh, W.J. and Shamma, J.S. (2000). Research on gain scheduling, Automatica36(10): 1401–1425.10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00058-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Sturm, J.F. (1999). Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones, Optimization Methods and Software11(1–4): 625–653.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun, X.-D. and Postlethwaite, I. (1998). Affine LPV modelling and its use in gain-scheduled helicopter control, UKACC International Conference on Control ‘98, Swansea, UK, Vol. 2, pp. 1504–1509.]Search in Google Scholar
[Theis, J., Seiler, P. and Werner, H. (2017). LPV model order reduction by parameter-varying oblique projection, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology26(3): 773–784.10.1109/TCST.2017.2692744]Search in Google Scholar
[Theodoulis, S. and Duc, G. (2009). Missile autopilot design: Gain-scheduling and the gap metric, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics32(3): 986–996.10.2514/1.34756]Search in Google Scholar
[Tseng, C.-S., Chen, B.-S. and Uang, H.-J. (2001). Fuzzy tracking control design for nonlinear dynamic systems via TS fuzzy model, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems9(3): 381–392.10.1109/91.928735]Search in Google Scholar
[Vinnicombe, G. (1996). The robustness of feedback systems with bounded complexity controllers, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control41(6): 795–803.10.1109/9.506232]Search in Google Scholar
[White, A.P., Zhu, G. and Choi, J. (2013). Linear Parameter-Varying Control for Engineering Applications, Springer, London.10.1007/978-1-4471-5040-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhao, P. and Nagamune, R. (2017). Switching LPV controller design under uncertain scheduling parameters, Automatica76: 243–250.10.1016/j.automatica.2016.10.026]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhou, M., Rodrigues, M., Shen, Y. and Theilliol, D. (2018). ℋ _/ℋ∞ fault detection observer design for a polytopic LPV system using the relative degree, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science28(1): 83–95, DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2018-0006.10.2478/amcs-2018-0006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zribi, A., Chtourou, M. and Djemal, M. (2016). A systematic determination approach of model’s base using gap metric for nonlinear systems, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control138(3): 031008.10.1115/1.4032222]Search in Google Scholar