1. bookVolume 49 (2022): Edizione 3 (October 2022)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2719-5384
Prima pubblicazione
05 Nov 2014
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Anatomical Variations of the Maxillary Sinus – A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

Pubblicato online: 26 Oct 2022
Volume & Edizione: Volume 49 (2022) - Edizione 3 (October 2022)
Pagine: 33 - 37
Ricevuto: 08 Feb 2022
Accettato: 03 Mar 2022
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2719-5384
Prima pubblicazione
05 Nov 2014
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

1. Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R. The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20190205.10.1259/dmfr.20190205695110231386556 Search in Google Scholar

2. Lata S, Mohanty SK, Vinay S et al. Is Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) a Potential Imaging Tool in ENT Practice?: A Cross-Sectional Survey Among ENT Surgeons in the State of Odisha, India. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;70:130-6.10.1007/s12070-017-1168-4580728229456957 Search in Google Scholar

3. Zhu J, Lin W, Yuan W, Chen L. New Insight on Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2021;6: Article ID 9997180.10.1155/2021/9997180 Search in Google Scholar

4. Luz J, Greutmann D, Wiedemeier D et al. 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Implant Dent. 2018:4:17.10.1186/s40729-018-0128-4598668829869022 Search in Google Scholar

5. Mudgade DK, Motghare PC, Kunjir GU et al. Prevalence of anatomical variations in maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography. J Indian Academy Oral Med Radiol. 2018;30:18-23.10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_81_17 Search in Google Scholar

6. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S et al. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113:817-26.10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.00522668710 Search in Google Scholar

7. Kumar M, Shanavas M, Sidappa A, Kiran M. Cone beam computed tomography – know its secrets. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:64-8. Search in Google Scholar

8. Dedeoğlu N, Altun O. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomical variations and pathologies in elderly, young, posterior dentate and edentulous patient groups with cone-beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019;78:595-59.10.5603/FM.a2019.001330761514 Search in Google Scholar

9. Shahidi S, Zamiri B, Momeni Danaei S et al. Evaluation of Anatomic Variations in Maxillary Sinus with the Aid of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in a Population in South of Iran. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016;17:7-15. Search in Google Scholar

10. Orhan K, Kusakci Seker B, Aksoy S et al. Cone beam CT evaluation of maxillary sinus septa prevalence, height, location and morphology in children and an adult population. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22:47-53.10.1159/000339849558670522832185 Search in Google Scholar

11. Kim MJ, Jung UW, Kim CS et al. Maxillary sinus septa: prevalence, height, location, and morphology. A reformatted computed tomography scan analysis. J Periodontol. 2006;77:903-8.10.1902/jop.2006.05024716671885 Search in Google Scholar

12. Khalighi Sigaroudi A, Dalili Kajan Z, Rastgar S, Neshandar Asli H. Frequency of different maxillary sinus septal patterns found on cone-beam computed tomography and predicting the associated risk of sinus membrane perforation during sinus lifting. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017;47:261-7.10.5624/isd.2017.47.4.261573850929279826 Search in Google Scholar

13. Koymen R, Gocmen-Mas N, Karacayli U et al. Anatomic evaluation of maxillary sinus septa: surgery and radiology. Clin Anat. 2009;22:563-70.10.1002/ca.2081319484797 Search in Google Scholar

14. Al-Zahrani MS, Al-Ahmari MM, Al-Zahrani AA, et al. Prevalence and morphological variations of maxillary sinus septa in different age groups: a CBCT analysis. Ann Saudi Med. 2020; 40: 200–6.10.5144/0256-4947.2020.200727062232493027 Search in Google Scholar

15. Pommer B, Ulm C, Lorenzoni M et al. Prevalence, location and morphology of maxillary sinus septa: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39:769-73.10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01897.x22624862 Search in Google Scholar

16. Jain V, Mathur VP, Pillai RS, Kalra S. A preliminary study to find out maximum occlusal bite force in Indian individuals. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25:325-30.10.4103/0970-9290.13833025098989 Search in Google Scholar

17. Alhumaidan G, Eltahir MA, Shaikh SS. Retrospective analysis of maxillary sinus septa – A cone beam computed tomography study. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33:467-473.10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.11.001858958134803288 Search in Google Scholar

18. Dandekeri SS, Hegde C, Kavassery P et al. CBCT Study of Morphologic Variations of Maxillary Sinus Septa in Relevance to Sinus Augmentation Procedures. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2020;10:51-56.10.4103/ams.ams_141_19743393532855915 Search in Google Scholar

19. Caversaccio M, Boschung U, Mudry A. Historical review of Haller’s cells. Ann Anat 2011;193:185-90.10.1016/j.aanat.2011.02.00621454060 Search in Google Scholar

20. Kamdi P, Nimma V, Ramchandani A et al. Evaluation of haller cell on CBCT and its association with maxillary sinus pathologies. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2018;30:41.10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_22_18 Search in Google Scholar

21. Mathew R, Omami G, Hand A et al. Cone beam CT analysis of Haller cells: prevalence and clinical significance. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:20130055.10.1259/dmfr.20130055382801923975112 Search in Google Scholar

22. Pekiner FN, Borahan MO, Dumlu A, Özbayrak S. Infraorbital ethmoid (Haller) cells: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. Oral Radiol. 2014;30:219-25.10.1007/s11282-014-0167-3 Search in Google Scholar

23. Raina A, Guledgud MV, Patil K. Infraorbital ethmoid (Haller’s) cells: a panoramic radiographic study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41:305-8.10.1259/dmfr/22999207372899822241882 Search in Google Scholar

24. Ozcan KM, Selcuk A, Oruk V et al. Ethmomaxillary sinus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265:185-8.10.1007/s00405-007-0444-417879095 Search in Google Scholar

25. Zhou F, Cao C, Fan W et al. The imaging anatomy of ethmomaxillary sinus and its impact on chronic rhinosinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278:719-726.10.1007/s00405-020-06322-y32879988 Search in Google Scholar

26. Liu J, Dai J, Wen X et al. Imaging and anatomical features of ethmomaxillary sinus and its differentiation from surrounding air cells. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018;40:207-215.10.1007/s00276-018-1974-829368251 Search in Google Scholar

27. Dasar U, Gokce E. Evaluation of variations in sinonasal region with computed tomography. World J Radiol. 2016;8: 98-108.10.4329/wjr.v8.i1.98473135326834948 Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo