INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

1. Gosselin L, Tye-Gingras M, Mathieu-Potvin F. Review of utilization of genetic algorithms in heat transfer problems. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2009; 52(9-10):2169-2188.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.11.015 Search in Google Scholar

2. Kot V. Solution of the classical Stefan problem: Neumann condition. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics. 2017; 90(4): 889-917.10.1007/s10891-017-1638-2 Search in Google Scholar

3. Chen J, Yu W, Tian J, Chen L, Zhou Z. Image contrast enhancement using an artificial bee colony algorithm. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation. 2018; 38:287-294.10.1016/j.swevo.2017.09.002 Search in Google Scholar

4. Zhao X, Xuan D, Zhao K, Li Z. Elman neural network using ant colony optimization algorithm for estimating of state of charge of lithium-ion battery. Journal of Energy Storage. 2020; 32:101789.10.1016/j.est.2020.101789 Search in Google Scholar

5. Karaboga D, Gorkemli B, Ozturk C, Karaboga N. A comprehensive survey: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and applications. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2014; 42:21-57.10.1007/s10462-012-9328-0 Search in Google Scholar

6. Karaboga D. An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical Report. Kayseri/Türkiye: Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department; 2005. Report No.: TR-06. Search in Google Scholar

7. Karaboga D, Basturk B. On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Applied Soft Computing. 2008; 8(1):687-697.10.1016/j.asoc.2007.05.007 Search in Google Scholar

8. Hetmaniok E, Słota D, Zielonka A. Artificial Bee Colo-ny Algorithm Used for Reconstructing the Heat Flux Density in the Solidification Process. In International Conference on Artificial Intel-ligence and Soft Computing; 2014; 363–372.10.1007/978-3-319-07176-3_32 Search in Google Scholar

9. Hetmaniok E, Słota D, Zielonka A, Wituła R. Comparison of ABC and ACO Algorithms Applied for Solving the Inverse Heat Conduction Problem. In International Symposium on Swarm Intelligence and Differential Evolution; 2012; 249–257.10.1007/978-3-642-29353-5_29 Search in Google Scholar

10. Hetmaniok E, Słota D, Zielonka A. Restoration of the cooling conditions in a three-dimensional continuous casting process using AI algorithms. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2015; 39(16): 4794-4807.10.1016/j.apm.2015.03.056 Search in Google Scholar

11. Zielonka A, Hetmaniok E, Słota D. Inverse alloy solidification problem including the material phenomenon solved by using the bee algorithm. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2017; 87:295-301.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.07.014 Search in Google Scholar

12. Grzymkowski R, Hetmaniok E, Słota D, Zielonka A. Application of the Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm in Solving the Inverse Stefan Problem. In Metal Forming; 2012; 1287-1290. Search in Google Scholar

13. Hetmaniok E, Słota D, Zielonka A. Application of the Swarm Intelligence Algorithm for Investigating the Inverse Continuous Casting Problem. Contemporary Challenges and Solutions in Applied Artificial Intelligence. 2013; 489: 157–162.10.1007/978-3-319-00651-2_21 Search in Google Scholar

14. Matsevityi YM, Alekhina SV, Borukhov VT. Identification of the thermal conductivity coefficient for quasi-stationary two-dimensional heat conduction equations. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics. 2017; 90(6):1295-1301.10.1007/s10891-017-1686-7 Search in Google Scholar

15. Tereshko V, Loengarov A. Collective decision-making in honey bee foraging dynamics. Computing and Information Systems. 2005; 9: 1-7. Search in Google Scholar

16. Colorni A, Dorigo M, Maniezzo V. Distributed Optimization by Ant Colonies. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Life; 1991; 134-142. Search in Google Scholar

17. Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A. Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics). 1996; 26(1):29-41.10.1109/3477.484436 Search in Google Scholar

18. Dorigo M, Di Caro G. Ant colony optimization: a new meta-heuristic. In Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99; 1999;1470-1477. Search in Google Scholar

19. Geuzaine C, Remacle JF. GMSH: a three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 2009; 79(11):1309-1331.10.1002/nme.2579 Search in Google Scholar

20. Dyja R, Grosser A. Oblicznia równoległe w symulacji krzepnięcia wykorzystującej model pośredni narstania fazy stałej. Modelowanie Inżynierskie. 2015; 24(55):21-26. Search in Google Scholar

21. Dyja R, Gawronska E, Grosser A, Jeruszka P, Sczygiol N. Estimate the Impact of Different Heat Capacity Approximation Methods on the Numerical Results During Computer Simulation of Solidification. Engineering Letters. 2016; 24(2):237-245. Search in Google Scholar

22. Kodali HK, Ganapathysubramanian B. A computational framework to investigate charge transport in heterogeneous organic photovoltaic devices. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2012; 247:113-129. Search in Google Scholar

23. Balay S, Gropp WD, McInnes LC, Smith BF. Efficient Management of Parallelism in Object-Oriented Numerical Software Libraries. In Arge E,BAM,LHP. Modern Software Tools for Scientific Computing. Boston. 1997;163–202.10.1007/978-1-4612-1986-6_8 Search in Google Scholar

24. Dyja R. Comparison of Results from In-House Solidification Convection Model with Standard Benchmark. Acta Physica Polonica. 2021; 139(5):525-528.10.12693/APhysPolA.139.525 Search in Google Scholar