Log hand TEWL P model=0.119, adjusted | R | 2=0.024 | Log forearm TEWL P model=0.303, adjusted | R | 2=0.007 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictors | Coefficient (95 % CI) | P | Coefficient (95 % CI) | P | ||
-0.04 (-0.09–0.02) | 0.218 | 0.04 (-0.01–0.09) | 0.140 | |||
0.03 (-0.02–0.08) | 0.257 | |||||
0.03 (-0.04–0.10) | 0.414 | 0.04 (-0.02–0.10) | 0.161 | |||
0.002 (-0.06–0.07) | 0.930 | 0.001 (-0.05–0.06) | 0.953 | |||
0.01 (-0.05–0.06) | 0.855 | 0.001 (0.05–0.05) | 0.974 | |||
0.01 (-0.02–0.14) | 0.821 | 0.01 (-0.04–0.06) | 0.660 |
Hairdressing apprentices (N=101) | Beautician apprentices (N=76) | Difference between hairdressing and beautician apprentices | |
---|---|---|---|
28 ( |
20 ( |
P=0.835 | |
37 (37) | 23 (30) | P=0.082 | |
29 ( |
34 (45) | – | |
40 (40) | 27 (36) | P=0.579 | |
3 (2–4) | 3 (2–4) | P=0.774 | |
19.6 (16.7–24.8) | 18.6 (13.7–23.0) | P=0.085 | |
12.2 (9.9–15.1) | 12.2 (10.3–15.0) | P=0.858 |