Accesso libero

Influence of Organic Solvents and β-cyclodextrins on Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Separation of Five Biogenic Amines and Two B Vitamins

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

INTRODUCTION

The neurotransmitters serotonin, dopamine, noradrenaline, and adrenaline have recently been a topic of interest because of their roles in the gut physiology and their potential roles in gastrointestinal (GIT) and central nervous system (CNS) pathophysiology. These molecules are able to affect gut motility, nutrient absorption, GIT innate immune system, and the microbiome (Mittal et al., 2017). Moreover, these neurotransmitters affect the regulation and control of the blood flow. Those effects are predominantly connected with adrenaline and noradrenaline, sympathomimetic molecules that have similar effects on β1 receptors in the heart and similar potency at α receptors (Katzung et al., 2012). Recently, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and Parkinson's disease are characterised by dysregulation of the levels of these neurotransmitters, therefore causing a variety of GIT symptoms (Mittal et al., 2017).

Tyramine represents a vasoactive biogenic amine associated with the hypertensive crisis. The physiological effects of tyramine include peripheral vasoconstriction, increased cardiac output, increased respiration, elevated blood glucose, and release of noradrenaline (McCabe-Sellers et al., 2006; Shalaby, 1996).

Thiamine (vitamin B1) and pyridoxine (vitamin B6) are water-soluble vitamins that play an indispensable role in some metabolic pathways. These vitamins are involved in the metabolism of proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates; synthesis of blood elements, neurotransmitters, nucleic acids, ATP, or immune modulatory metabolites; and reduction of cellular oxidative stress. Hence, recent studies showed the impact of thiamine and pyridoxine substitution therapy on the suppression of IBD symptoms (Ghishan & Kiela, 2017; Selhub et al., 2013). All aforementioned biogenic amines and B vitamins are small polar molecules and so capillary electrophoresis (CE) is a favourable separation analytical method for their qualitative and quantitative analysis.

In some cases, the simultaneous CE separation of various compounds at an appropriate resolution level cannot be reached. That is due to the similar electromigration behaviour of the analytes, which could be caused by the physicochemical properties of the separated compounds (e.g., the analytes have the same charge to mass ratio). There are some solutions for how to overcome and solve such discrepancies. The preferred manner is the use of a modifier of the separation environment. Positive effect on the separation selectivity enhancement was demonstrated by the use of organic solvents and substances well known as chiral selectors. The main mechanism of action of those modifiers is associated with the change of pKa values of the analytes, modification of the radius of the solvated species, alteration in the solubility of the analytes, or differences in the complexation properties (Orlandini et al. 2014; Sarmini & Kenndler, 1998a, 1998b, 1999; Wheatley 2001). Alcohols are the most frequently used organic solvents that affect the separation selectivity. Moreover, alcohols as main components of the background electrolyte (BGE) are successfully used in nonaqueous electrophoresis (Klampfl & Himmelsbach, 2016). Hence, the presence of the organic modifiers in bulk helps solubilisation of hydrophobic analytes in water, and thus can enhance their interactions with micellar phase in the case of micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC; Ghosh & Dey, 2008). The increase of separation efficiency of the biogenic amines obtained with the approach based on addition of alcohol into BGE of capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) was presented by Male and Loung (2001), Bacaloni et al. (2013), and Gomez et al. (2015). The presence of such organic solvent effects decreased conductivity of the BGE, decreased thermal diffusion, and improved analyte solubility (Landers, 2007). Promising results in selectivity enhancement of structurally related substances analysed by CE techniques (especially MEKC) were also achieved by the addition of tetrahydrofuran into the separation environment (Barrón et al., 2000; Cheng et al., 2008; Flor et al., 2010; Kuo et al., 2003; Lin et al., 2012). Another approach implemented into the separation of biogenic amines is based on the use of cyclodextrins. Cyclodextrins and their derivatives are the most used chiral selectors in separation of enantiomers by CE. It is due to the possibility of formation of complexes with a large scale of various compounds, good solubility in water solutions, stability, and acceptable price (Wieczorek, 2013). The benefits of cyclodextrin chiral selectors in separation of biogenic amines by CE were demonstrated in some interesting original papers (Belin & Seeger, 2009; Benturquia et al., 2005; Claude et al., 2011; Fang et al., 2013; He et al., 2017; Huhn et al., 2005; Male & Luong, 2001). All aforementioned original research papers dedicated to the effect of organic solvents and chiral selectors on migration of some important biogenic amines were performed by the hydrodynamically open capillary electrophoretic systems.

In our study, the effects of chiral selector type, organic modifier type, and their concentration on CZE separation of five biogenic amines—dopamine, serotonin, tyramine, adrenaline, and noradrenaline—and two vitamins—thiamine and pyridoxine, namely—in a simple hydrodynamically closed CE analytical system were investigated. Moreover, the developed and optimised CZE-UV method was validated and according to the obtained data this method represents a robust, effective, and low-cost device for simultaneous analysis of mentioned biogenic amines and B vitamins.

EXPERIMENT
Instrumentation

The CZE experiments were performed with the use of a modular CE analyser EA-102 (Villa Labeco, Spisska Nova Ves, Slovakia) in the CZE mode arrangement operated in a hydrodynamically (membrane) closed system. The sample was injected by a 200 nL internal sample loop that was a part of the injection valve of the analyser. The separation column was provided with a 300 μm I.D. capillary tube made of polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) of a 160 mm total length. A contactless conductivity detector was an integral part of the CZE separation column. An ECOM photometric detector (ECOM, Prague, Czech Republic) was connected to an on-column photometric detection cell, integrated in the CZE column, via optical fibers. The detector operated under stable wavelength conditions set at 260 nm. This detection wavelength was chosen as a compromise between UV absorption maxima of observed analytes. The ITP Pro 32 software (Villa Labeco, Spisska Nova Ves, Slovakia) was used to control the separation process and to acquire data from the detectors. The experiments were performed in constant current mode at 20 °C. The applied current was 50 μA.

Prior to use, the capillary was not treated by any rinsing procedures to suppress an electroosmotic flow (EOF). Dynamic coating of the capillary wall was performed with the use of methyl-hydroxyethylcellulose (m-HEC, 30000; Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) at a 0.1% (w/v) concentration in separation buffer and serves as an EOF suppression solution. This procedure is very well described in the literature, and it is frequently used in hydrodynamically closed CE systems (Kaniansky et al., 1997).

Chemicals and samples

Analytical-grade 5-hydroxytryptamine hydrochloride (serotonin, 5-HT), dopamine hydrochloride (DOP), tyramine hydrochloride (TYR), adrenaline hydrochloride (ADR), noradrenaline hydrochloride (NOR), thiamine hydrochloride (THI), and pyridoxine hydrochloride (PYR), ɛ-aminocaproic acid (EACA), and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). LC-MS grade acetic acid (HAc), ammonium acetate (NH4Ac), formic acid (HFo), ammonium formate (NH4Fo), isopropanol (IP), methanol (MeOH), and acetonitrile (ACN) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) p.a. quality was purchased from Centralchem (Bratislava, Slovakia). Carboxyethyl-β-cyclodextrin (DS 3.5, CE purity), CE-β-CD, was obtained from Cyclolab (Budapest, Hungary) and (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin (DS 4.5), HP-β-CD, was obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Demineralised water from a Millipore Simplicity 185 (UV) (Millipore, Molsheim, France) water purification system was used for the preparation of electrolyte solutions and samples. All solutions were filtered prior to use with disposable membrane filters (0.45 μm pore size Millipore) and were stored under refrigeration before analysis.

Procedures for background electrolytes preparation

The BGEs were prepared by dissolving of solid substances (NH4Ac, NH4Fo, EACA, GABA) or diluting of concentrated liquids (HFo, HAc) in demineralised water. The pH of the prepared electrolyte systems (water solutions) was measured by the SevenExcellence pH meter S400 (Mettler Toledo, Bratislava, Slovakia). The BGE with organic modifier was prepared by appropriate dilution of more concentrated original BGE (twice as concentrated as required) with demineralised water and the demanded amount of organic solvent. The BGE with cyclodextrins was prepared by dissolving the required amount of the selector in original BGE.

Procedures for standard solution and sample preparation

The stock solutions of 5-HT, DOP, TYR, ADR, NOR, THI, and PYR reference substances were prepared by dissolving 10 mg of their powder in 10 mL of demineralised water. Working solutions of 5-HT, DOP, TYR, ADR, NOR, THI, and PYR were made by a proper dilution of the stock solutions with demineralised water.

The concentration levels of 5-HT, DOP, TYR, ADR, NOR, THI, and PYR in the injected calibration solutions, prepared in demineralised water were in the range of 0.5–50 μg/mL−1 (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25 and 50 μg/mL−1).

The samples for the stability study were prepared at three concentration levels (2.5, 15, and 30 μg/mL−1) by an appropriate dilution of the standard stock solution with demineralised water. The samples were stored for 24 h under the following temperature conditions: laboratory temperature (i.e., 20 °C), 4 °C, −20 °C, and −80 °C. After the incubation period, the samples were directly (after thawing of the frozen samples) injected into the CE apparatus.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Development of the CZE-UV method

The optimisation of the CZE separation conditions of five biogenic amines and two B vitamins was the crucial step of the method development. The main optimised operating parameters were carrier cation and counter ion, pH of the buffer, type and concentration of the buffer, and type and amount of an additive (i.e., organic solvent, cyclodextrin, or both). These parameters were optimised to obtain (1) the maximal separation efficiency; (2) minimisation of thermal, adsorption, and electromigration dispersion effects; and (3) sufficient resolution of the analytes. The selection of carrier cation and counter ion was made with the goal of simplicity and potential applicability of further connection of the developed CE method with mass spectrometry. Therefore, low molecular weight and volatile buffer constituents such as NH4Ac, NH4Fo, Hac, or HFo were tested at first. Hence, the effect of electrolytes composed of EACA and GABA was also investigated, according to the very promising results obtained in analysis of some drugs, metabolites, and endogenous substances (Ginterová et al., 2012; Piešťanský et al., 2015; Piešťanský et al., 2017). The initial experiments have shown that the main problem of the simultaneous separation of the selected analytes was associated with the similar electromigration behaviour of two biogenic amines—dopamine and serotonin—which migrate as one peak. The BGE composed only from NH4Ac or NH4Fo was not capable of solving the observed separation problem and similar results were obtained with the use of a combination of NH4Ac with HAc or NH4Fo with HFo. The use of BGE composed of two components was more beneficial from the stability of migration time and analytical signal point of view (RSDtm ≤ 1%; RSDarea ≤ 10%). Moreover, higher stability of the analytical signal was obtained when the combination of NH4Ac with HAc was used. Higher concentrations of HAc in such a type of BGE led not only to the high stability of analytical signal during the separation, but also to acceptable and very stable levels of separation voltage (≤ 5kV), which are associated with acceptable levels of Joule heating generation. Higher concentration of HAc in BGE was associated with higher buffering capacity and stable pH value of the separation electrolyte. The same effect was also observed when EACA+ or GABA+ were used as carrier cations. Finally, three BGEs were compared:10 mM NH4Ac + 30 mM HAc (pH = 5.18) + 0.1% m-HEC (w/v); 25 mM EACA + 50 mM HAc (pH = 4.30) + 0.1% m-HEC (w/v); and 25 mM GABA + 50 mM HAc (pH = 4.10) + 0.1% m-HEC (w/v), where the m-HEC served as an EOF suppressor. Comparison of electropherograms obtained from the CZE-UV analysis of all monitored analytes under the aforementioned BGE composition conditions is illustrated in Figure 1. BGEs composed of 10 mM NH4Ac + 30 mM HAc and 25 mM EACA + 50 mM HAc showed very similar results. No significant difference in migration time and resolution of the analytes was observed. The use of 25 mM GABA + 50 mM Hac as BGE was associated with elongation of the migration time of the analytes; on the other hand, better parameters of resolution, separation efficiency (N > 13,000), peak shape, and peak intensity were obtained. This BGE composition was therefore used for further experiments. Next optimisation steps were performed to find operational conditions leading to satisfactory separation of all seven analytes from each other. The experimental conditions were systematically changed and optimised by investigating the effects of main CZE parameters of separation.

Figure 1

Optimisation of the background electrolyte (BGE) composition. 1 = thiamine hydrochloride (THI), 2 = tyramine hydrochloride (TYR), 3 = dopamine hydrochloride (DOP), 4 = 5-hydroxytryptamine hydrochloride (5-HT), 5 = noradrenaline hydrochloride (NOR), 6 = adrenaline hydrochloride (ADR), 7 = pyridoxine hydrochloride (PYR). Concentration of the analytes in the sample was 10 μg/mL−1. Applied separation current was 50 μA. For more operation conditions see the part Instrumentation.

Influence of organic solvent additives

The effect of addition of organic solvents—acetonitrile (ACN), tetrahydrofuran (THF), and two alcohols (methanol [MeOH] and isopropanol [IP], namely—at 5% to 30% level to the previous selected BGE on separation of five biogenic amines and two B vitamins was investigated. The upper limit—30% of the organic solvent modification—was chosen according to the specification of the electrophoretic analyser. The implementation of methanol into the separation environment brings no effective separation of DOP and 5-HT from each other. With higher amounts of methanol, it shortens of the migration time, but also reduces separation efficiency. The migration order of the analytes was not affected, clearly demonstrated by the electropherograms in Figure 2a. The same behaviour of the monitored analytes was observed in the case of the addition of ACN to the BGE. Hence, a higher amount of ACN led to the creation of a new mixed zone of THI and TYR and probably partial separation of DOP from the mixed zone with 5-HT (Figure 2b). On the contrary, the addition of IP was accompanied by partial separation of DOP and 5-HT. Promising results were obtained when IP at the 20% level was present in the BGE. However, formation of a new mixed zone of THI and TYR was observed. Further increase of IP amount in BGE was superior in the case of enhanced resolution of the main problematic analytes—DOP and 5-HT. On the other hand, it caused formation of a new mixed zone of THI and DOP. These findings are illustrated and summarised in Figure 2c. Very interesting results were obtained with the use of THF. An increased amount of THF in the BGE led to improved separation of the comigrating analytes (i.e., DOP and 5-HT). Addition of 10% of that modifier was able to separate all seven analytes with sufficient resolution. Further increase of THF in the BGE was accompanied with improved resolution between DOP and 5-HT, but also with the creation of a new mixed peak of 5-HT and NOR (Figure 2d).

Figure 2

Effect of organic solvent addition into the background electrolyte (BGE) on the simultaneous separation of five biogenic amines and two B vitamins. (a) Addition of methanol (MeOH); (b) addition of acetonitrile (ACN); (c) addition of isopropanol (IP); (d) addition of tetrahydrofuran (THF). BGE = 25 mM GABA + 50 mM HAc + 0.1% mHEC. Concentration of the analytes in the sample was 10 μg/mL−1. Applied separation current was 50 μA. 1 = thiamine hydrochloride (THI), 2 = tyramine hydrochloride (TYR), 3 = dopamine hydrochloride (DOP), 4 = 5-hydroxytryptamine hydrochloride (5-HT), 5 = noradrenaline hydrochloride (NOR), 6 = adrenaline hydrochloride (ADR), 7 = pyridoxine hydrochloride (PYR). For more operation conditions, see the “Instrumentation” section.

Further, simultaneous addition of two organic solvents into the BGE was tested. The combination of THF and IP was selected according to the ability to resolve DOP and 5-HT peaks from each other (see Figure 2c and 2d). The best results were obtained when 5% THF was selected as a starting point and the amount of IP was systematically increased from 5% to 15%. Under such conditions, the increase of IP portion in the BGE was accompanied with improved resolution between DOP and 5-HT. The optimum conditions that enabled sufficient resolution of all investigated analytes were obtained when BGE with 5% THF and 10% IP was used (Figure 3). These separation conditions were characterised by high levels of signal stability (constant baseline noise without fluctuations) and reproducibility (RSDtm ≤ 0.5%, RSDarea ≤ 7%).

Figure 3

Effect of simultaneous addition of tetrahydrofuran (THF) and isopropanol (IP) into the background electrolyte (BGE) on the separation of five biogenic amines and two B vitamins. BGE = 25 mM GABA + 50 mM HAc + 0.1% m-HEC. Concentration of the analytes in the sample was 10 μg/mL−1. Applied separation current was 50 μA. 1 = thiamine hydrochloride (THI), 2 = tyramine hydrochloride (TYR), 3 = dopamine hydrochloride (DOP), 4 = 5-hydroxytryptamine hydrochloride (5-HT), 5 = noradrenaline hydrochloride (NOR), 6 = adrenaline hydrochloride (ADR), 7 = pyridoxine hydrochloride (PYR). For other operation conditions, see the “Instrumentation” section.

Influence of β-cyclodextrin additives

Modified β-cyclodextrins were used in the next step to discover their influence on separation of selected biogenic amines and B vitamins. This step was necessary because cyclodextrins are widely used additives in the electromigration environment for selectivity (especially enantioseparation) enhancement. Such investigation was able to provide a comprehensive view of the selectivity enhancement possibilities. Negatively charged CE-β-CD, and uncharged HP-β-CD were tested under the same experimental conditions. Both types of cyclodextrins showed good solubility in the BGE in the range of 1 to 2.5 mg/mL−1 (CE-β-CD) and 5 to 15 mg/mL−1 (HP-β-CD), respectively. Lower concentration range of the CE-β-CD was chosen due to the charged character of the modifier, which significantly affects the separation in terms of elongation of the migration time. It was demonstrated that CE-β-CD at the concentration of 1 mg/mL−1 is responsible for creation of a new mixed peak of ADR and PYR. Further increase of the chiral selector concentration led to peak merging of TYR, DOP, and 5-HT. These findings are illustrated in Figure 4a.

Figure 4

Effect of CE-β-CD addition into the background electrolyte (BGE) on the simultaneous separation of five biogenic amines and two B vitamins. (a) Addition of CE-β-CD at various concentration levels; (b) addition of CE-β-CD at 1 mg/mL−1 concentration level and isopropanol; (c) addition of CE-β-CD at 2 mg/mL−1 concentration level and isopropanol; (d) addition of CE-β-CD at 2.5 mg/mL1 concentration level and isopropanol. BGE = 25 mM GABA + 50 mM HAc + 0.1% mHEC. Concentration of the analytes in the sample was 10 μg/mL−1. Applied separation current was 50 μA. 1 = thiamine hydrochloride (THI), 2 = tyramine hydrochloride (TYR), 3 = dopamine hydrochloride (DOP), 4 = 5-hydroxytryptamine hydrochloride (5-HT), 5 = noradrenaline hydrochloride (NOR), 6 = adrenaline hydrochloride (ADR), 7 = pyridoxine hydrochloride (PYR). For more operation conditions, see the “Instrumentation” section.

The addition of uncharged HP-β-CD at low concentration (5 mg/mL−1) level was beneficial in terms of partial separation of DOP and 5-HT from each other (Figure 5a). A further increase in resolution between DOP and 5-HT was achieved with the application of a higher concentration of the chiral selector. On the other hand, increased concentration of HP-β-CD formed new mixed peaks of 5-HT and NOR, ADR, and PYR; and TYR and DOP (Figure 5a).

Figure 5

Effect of HP-β-CD addition into the background electrolyte (BGE) on the simultaneous separation of five biogenic amines and two B vitamins. (a) Addition of HP-β-CD at various concentration levels; (b) addition of HP-β-CD at 5 mg/mL−1 concentration level and isopropanol; (c) addition of HP-β-CD at 10 mg/mL−1 concentration level and isopropanol; (d) addition of HP-β-CD at 15 mg/mL−1 concentration level and isopropanol. BGE = 25 mM GABA + 50 mM HAc + 0.1% mHEC. Concentration of the analytes in the sample was 10 μg/mL−1. Applied separation current was 50 μA. 1 = thiamine hydrochloride (THI), 2 = tyramine hydrochloride (TYR), 3 = dopamine hydrochloride (DOP), 4 = 5-hydroxytryptamine hydrochloride (5-HT), 5 = noradrenaline hydrochloride (NOR), 6 = adrenaline hydrochloride (ADR), 7 = pyridoxine hydrochloride (PYR). For more operation conditions, see the “Instrumentation” section.

Simultaneous effect of modified β-cyclodextrins and organic solvent on migration behaviour of selected biogenic amines and B vitamins was also investigated. According to favourable parameters obtained during the previous tests, IP as organic solvent was selected. The effect on separation of the selected analytes was discovered by simultaneous addition of chiral selector in the concentration range of 1 to 2.5 mg/mL−1 (CE-β-CD), or 5 to 15 mg/mL−1 (HP-β-CD) and IP in the range of 10% to 30%. According to the obtained results (Figure 4b–d and Figure 5b–d), it can be stated that the addition of IP enhances the resolution of DOP and 5-HT. Unfortunately, there also is a negative effect of the resolution of other biogenic amines and it comes to creation of mixed peaks of THI with TYR, or 5-HT with ADR.

Validation

The developed and optimised CZE-UV method using the BGE composed of 25 mM GABA + 50 mM HAc + 0.1% m-HEC + 5% THF + 10% IP was validated according to the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Q2(R1) guideline (ICH 2005) with the use of a model mixture of five biogenic amines and two B vitamins prepared in demineralised water. All resulting statistical data and performance parameters of the method are given in Table 1. Parameters of calibration curves in the water matrix were calculated using Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

Selected operation and validation parameters of the proposed CZE-UV method.

THI TYR DOP 5-HT NOR ADR PYR
tm (min) 12.09 12.95 14.09 14.60 15.06 15.73 18.44
RSDtm (%), n=6 0.24 0.02 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.21
RSDarea (%), n=6 1.82 4.30 8.21 5.47 4.76 4.27 1.67
Calibration equation y=104.03x + 77.112 y=15.15x − 3.721 y=9.64x + 8.563 y=44.70x + 11.626 y=7.27x − 8.347 y=12.43x − 5.641 y=38.48x − 3.648
r2 0.9994 0.9991 0.9957 0.9996 0.9924 0.9979 0.9995
Linear range 0.5 – 50 2.5 – 50 2.5 – 50 0.5 – 50 2.5 – 50 2.5 – 50 0.5 – 50
LOD (μg.mL−1) 0.15 1.25 1.25 0.25 1.25 1.25 0.25
LOQ (μg.mL−1) 0.5 2.5 2.5 0.5 2.5 2.5 0.5
N 31729 28753 27813 28162 29880 22327 27182
R 2.99 3.57 1.47 1.32 1.76 6.27

tm – migration time, RSDtm – relative standard deviation of migration time, RSDarea – relative standard deviation of peak area, LOD – limit of detection, LOQ – limit of quantification, N – separation efficiency, R – resolution. Separation efficiency (N) was calculated according to the equation N = 5.545*(tm/w1/2)2, where tm is the migration time and w1/2 is the full width at half maximum of the peak. Resolution (R) was calculated according to the equation R = 1.18*(tmB – tmA)/(w1/2A + w1/2B), where tmA and tmB represent migration times of analyte A and B, and w1/2A and w1/2B represent the full width of the peaks A and B at their half maximum. The calibration curve is expressed by the equation y = b.x + a. RSDtm and RSDarea were calculated from the samples at LOQ concentration level. LOD and LOQ were calculated as the signal (S) to noise (N) ratios to be 3xS/N and 10xS/N, respectively.

The hydrodynamically closed CZE separation system was characterised with enhanced sample loadability (200 nL) in comparison with commercially preferred hydrodynamically open apparatus (obviously tens of nL). Therefore, the sensitivity of such an analytical approach was also increased. The predicted limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values calculated from the calibration equations were in the range of 0.15 to 1.25 μg/mL−1 and 0.5 to 2.5 μg/mL−1, respectively. The results clearly show applicability of the developed method in the field of trace quantitative determination of these analytes in, for example, pharmaceutical matrices.

The coefficients of determination (r2) of each analyte were higher than 0.99. It reflects good linearity in a 0.5 to 50 μg/mL−1 (THI, 5-HT, PYR) and 2.5 to 50 μg/mL−1 (TYR, DOP, NOR, ADR) concentration range of selected biogenic amines and B vitamins. The sufficient linearity of the method for investigated analytes in selected concentration ranges was approved by the regression analysis. Moreover, statistical significance of the slope was evaluated. Evaluated repeatability is acceptable as clearly shown by the values of RSDs of migration times (RSDtm), and peak areas (RSDarea) of selected biogenic amines and B vitamins measured at LOQ concentration level.

Precision of the developed method was determined as intraand interday precision (Table 2). The RSD values were in the range of 0.4% to 15.5% for the intraday assay and in the range of 0.9% to 18.3% for the interday assay. Accuracy of the method was measured as the percent of analyte recovered by the assay (expressed as %Nom). The determined values during the accuracy test were in the range of 82.9% to 117.8% for the intraday measurements and in the range of 87.6% to 119.2% for the interday measurements. All of the observed results were within the acceptance criteria of the ICH guideline.

Accuracy and precision data obtained by the CZE-UV method.

Intra-day, n = 5
Found (μg.mL−1) RSD (%) % Nom.
Nominal (μg.mL−1) THI TYR DOP 5-HT NOR ADR PYR THI TYR DOP 5-HT NOR ADR PYR THI TYR DOP 5-HT NOR ADR PYR
0.5 0.54 - - 0.43 - - 0.56 8.2 - - 10.7 - - 15.5 108.1 - - 86.8 - - 112.1
1 1.09 - - 1.02 - - 0.99 13.1 - - 8.2 - - 10.6 108.5 - - 101.6 - - 99.4
2.5 2.77 2.64 2.07 2.42 2.95 2.84 2.59 11.0 8.6 15.1 4.2 8.9 4.4 5.4 110.7 105.5 82.9 97.0 117.8 113.5 103.7
5 4.97 5.00 4.95 5.06 4.97 4.99 5.10 3.5 8.2 7.7 1.9 13.4 3.3 3.8 99.4 100.1 98.9 101.2 99.5 99.8 101.9
10 9.23 9.21 10.21 9.77 9.71 9.54 9.22 1.2 1.5 8.0 2.7 2.3 4.8 1.7 92.3 92.1 102.1 97.7 97.1 95.4 92.2
25 25.47 25.99 26.15 25.51 24.08 25.11 25.01 1.0 1.6 6.5 0.4 1.2 0.4 1.7 101.9 104.0 104.6 102.0 96.3 100.5 100.0
50 49.91 49.65 49.42 49.79 50.48 50.02 50.10 0.4 2.1 3.4 1.2 2.6 4.0 0.5 99.8 99.3 98.9 99.6 101.0 100.1 100.2
Inter-day, n = 15
Found (μg.mL−1) RSD (%) % Nom.
Nominal (μg.mL−1) THI TYR DOP 5-HT NOR ADR PYR THI TYR DOP 5-HT NOR ADR PYR THI TYR DOP 5-HT NOR ADR PYR
0.5 0.57 - - 0.44 - - 0.59 10.7 - - 15.0 - - 13.4 113.5 - - 87.6 - - 117.8
1 0.96 - - 1.02 - - 1.00 14.7 - - 11.7 - - 8.1 95.7 - - 102.3 - - 99.6
2.5 2.61 2.60 2.15 2.42 3.02 2.98 2.49 10.1 14.8 18.3 3.8 6.2 12.5 6.9 104.5 103.9 85.8 96.8 120.8 119.2 99.6
5 5.21 5.05 4.76 4.86 5.33 5.34 5.23 5.6 5.6 8.8 4.8 11.1 11.1 12.0 104.3 100.9 93.8 97.1 106.6 106.9 104.6
10 9.72 9.56 10.62 10.11 9.70 9.18 9.65 5.7 4.1 8.8 4.3 2.6 7.1 5.6 97.2 95.6 106.2 101.1 97.0 91.8 96.5
25 25.54 25.44 26.19 25.42 23.40 24.78 24.81 0.9 3.2 5.5 0.9 6.6 2.0 1.7 102.2 101.8 104.7 101.7 93.6 99.1 99.2
50 49.77 49.86 49.36 49.79 50.79 50.22 50.14 0.4 2.0 2.7 1.0 2.4 3.0 0.9 99.5 99.7 98.7 99.6 101.6 100.4 100.3

The small, but deliberate variation of the operational parameters in the robustness test resulted in fluctuations of the migration time less than 1.5% of the value obtained under the standard conditions. Therefore, it can be supposed that small changes in operational parameters should not influence the migration time significantly, the method is robust enough, and indicates its reliability during normal usage.

Method application: Stability study of the selected biogenic amines and B vitamins

Finally, the developed CZE-UV approach in a hydrodynamically closed separation system was applied to investigate the stability of the analytes in model water samples. Short-term stability studies under various temperature conditions were investigated. The samples at three concentration levels of the analytes (2.5, 15, and 30 μg/mL−1) were stored for 24 h at laboratory temperature (20 °C), 4 °C, −20 °C, and −80 °C. The results summarised in Table 3 clearly demonstrate appropriate stability of the tested analytes.

Stability study of the analytes performed under various storage conditions.

% difference from the initial concentration, n = 5
20°C 4°C −20°C −80°C
c (μg.mL−1) 2.5 15 30 2.5 15 30 2.5 15 30 2.5 15 30
THI −8.6 0.7 0.6 −0.9 −4.4 −1.3 0.26 −2.4 3.8 0.5 0.2 0.2
TYR −13.8 6.5 −2.4 9.8 8.1 −4.2 3.1 14.5 2.5 1.0 1.4 −4.6
DOP −9.4 −0.6 0.4 2.4 −2.6 0.3 3.3 −2.4 4.2 −8.6 −0.7 1.0
5−HT 2.4 0.1 0.7 4.2 −1.2 1.2 0.5 0.7 2.6 0.4 3.3 1.6
NOR 2.0 2.7 6.3 −2.8 −0.4 9.1 −5.0 1.5 2.7 −14.6 6.5 5.0
ARD −1.1 1.4 2.4 −1.0 −7.1 −1.6 3.3 2.7 2.0 −7.0 7.5 2.3
PYR 1.8 −1.2 −3.4 3.1 −9.0 −1.0 −2.8 −10.7 −1.4 0.7 −8.1 −0.6
CONCLUSION

In this work, the effect of organic solvents and β-cyclodextrin modifiers of the CZE separation environment on separation of five biogenic amines and two B vitamins was investigated. An organic solvent modified CZE method using a combination of tetrahydrofuran and isopropanol was established for the effective separation of tyramine, dopamine, serotonin, noradrenaline, adrenaline, thiamine, and pyridoxine. The developed method was performed in a hydrodynamically closed CZE separation system that is characterised by higher sample load capacity (200 nL). Due to this benefit, a simple absorbance UV detection was sufficient for obtaining relatively low concentration limits of detection for all five biogenic amines and two B vitamins (LOD values in the range of 0.15–1.25 μg/mL−1). The developed method is simple, environmentally friendly, and involves low reagent consumption. Moreover, the use of selected BGE constituents favours this method for its further connection with mass spectrometry detection.

eISSN:
2453-6725
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
2 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Pharmacy, other