Accesso libero

Influence of coliform bacteria infection on intestinal goblet cells secretory activity of germ-free piglets

Toth Stefan

Toth Stefan

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and EmbryologyKošice, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Stefan, Toth
, 
Holodova Monika

Holodova Monika

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and EmbryologyKošice, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Monika, Holodova
, 
Zeidan Deema

Zeidan Deema

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and EmbryologyKošice, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Deema, Zeidan
, 
Hartel Patrick

Hartel Patrick

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and EmbryologyKošice, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Patrick, Hartel
, 
Fagova Zuzana

Fagova Zuzana

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and EmbryologyKošice, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Zuzana, Fagova
, 
Curgali Kristina

Curgali Kristina

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and EmbryologyKošice, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kristina, Curgali
, 
Mechirova Eva

Mechirova Eva

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and EmbryologyKošice, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Eva, Mechirova
, 
Maretta Milan

Maretta Milan

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology and L. Pasteur University HospitalKošice, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Milan, Maretta
, 
Nemcova Radomira

Nemcova Radomira

University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyKošice, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Radomira, Nemcova
, 
Gancarčikova Sona

Gancarčikova Sona

University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyKošice, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Sona, Gancarčikova
, 
Polak Stefan

Polak Stefan

Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Histology and EmbryologyBratislava, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Stefan, Polak
 e 
Dankova Marianna

Dankova Marianna

Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Histology and EmbryologyBratislava, Slovak Republic
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Marianna, Dankova
  
23 ago 2022
Influence of coliform bacteria infection on intestinal goblet cells secretory activity of germ-free piglets's Cover Image
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Cita
Scarica la copertina
Pubblicato online: 23 ago 2022
Pagine: 62 - 69
Ricevuto: 07 giu 2022
Accettato: 24 giu 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acm-2022-0008
Parole chiave
© 2022 Danková M. et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Fig 1

Graph illustrating the average number of alcian blue (AB) positive GCs in gut for each condition. Note that AB positive GCs were decreased in the jejunum of ECK piglets as well as in the colon of ECK piglets (***indicates the values differ significantly from the from the jejunum of HC piglets at p<0.001; xxx indicates the values differ significantly from the colon of HC piglets at p< 0.001). Greater numbers of AB positive GCs were observed in colon of both groups of piglets (***indicates the values differ significantly from the jejunum of HC piglets at p< 0.001; oooindicates the values differ significantly from the jejunum ECK piglets at p< 0.001). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer tests were used.
Graph illustrating the average number of alcian blue (AB) positive GCs in gut for each condition. Note that AB positive GCs were decreased in the jejunum of ECK piglets as well as in the colon of ECK piglets (***indicates the values differ significantly from the from the jejunum of HC piglets at p<0.001; xxx indicates the values differ significantly from the colon of HC piglets at p< 0.001). Greater numbers of AB positive GCs were observed in colon of both groups of piglets (***indicates the values differ significantly from the jejunum of HC piglets at p< 0.001; oooindicates the values differ significantly from the jejunum ECK piglets at p< 0.001). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer tests were used.

Fig. 2

Representative microphotographs of histochemical analysis of GCs producing acidic mucins by Alcian blue staining in the gut for each condition. (HC – healthy control A1 –jejunum and B1 - colon; ECK – infected experimental group, A2 – jejunum and B2,3 – colon, a – positive thin mucus layer, b – strongly positive cytoplasm of GCs). Scale bar = 200 μm.
Representative microphotographs of histochemical analysis of GCs producing acidic mucins by Alcian blue staining in the gut for each condition. (HC – healthy control A1 –jejunum and B1 - colon; ECK – infected experimental group, A2 – jejunum and B2,3 – colon, a – positive thin mucus layer, b – strongly positive cytoplasm of GCs). Scale bar = 200 μm.

Fig. 3

Graph illustrating the average number of PAS positive GCs in gut for each condition. Note that PAS positive GCs were decreased in the jejunum of ECK piglets (**indicates the values differ significantly from the from the jejunum of HC piglets at p<0.01). Greater numbers of PAS positive GCs were observed in colon of both groups of piglets (***indicates the values differ significantly from the jejunum of HC piglets at p< 0.001; oooindicates the values differ significantly from the jejunum ECK piglets at p<0.001). Significant increase of PAS positive GCs was detected also in colon of ECK piglets in comparison to HC piglets (xxxindicates the values differ significantly from the colon of HC piglets at p<0.001). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer tests were used.
Graph illustrating the average number of PAS positive GCs in gut for each condition. Note that PAS positive GCs were decreased in the jejunum of ECK piglets (**indicates the values differ significantly from the from the jejunum of HC piglets at p<0.01). Greater numbers of PAS positive GCs were observed in colon of both groups of piglets (***indicates the values differ significantly from the jejunum of HC piglets at p< 0.001; oooindicates the values differ significantly from the jejunum ECK piglets at p<0.001). Significant increase of PAS positive GCs was detected also in colon of ECK piglets in comparison to HC piglets (xxxindicates the values differ significantly from the colon of HC piglets at p<0.001). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer tests were used.

Fig. 4

Representative microphotographs of histochemical analysis of GCs producing neutral mucins by PAS-reaction in the gut for each condition. (HC – healthy control, A1 – jejunum and B1 – colon; ECK – infected experimental group, A2,3 – jejunum and B2 – colon a – positive glycocalyx, b – strongly PAS positive cytoplasm of GCs). Scale bar = 200 μm.
Representative microphotographs of histochemical analysis of GCs producing neutral mucins by PAS-reaction in the gut for each condition. (HC – healthy control, A1 – jejunum and B1 – colon; ECK – infected experimental group, A2,3 – jejunum and B2 – colon a – positive glycocalyx, b – strongly PAS positive cytoplasm of GCs). Scale bar = 200 μm.
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
3 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Medicina, Medicina clinica, Medicina interna, Cardiologia
Feed RSS della rivista