Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting in Combination with Swim-Up Efficiency Improve Effectivity of Spermatozoa Separation

1. Evenson DP, Larson KL, Jost LK. Sperm chromatin structure andrology lab corner assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. J Androl.2002;23(1):25-43; DOI:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02599.x.10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02599.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Lewis SE, Aitken RJ, Conner SJ, Iuliis GD, Henkel R, Giwercman A, Gharagozloo P. The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Reprod Biomed. 2013;27(4):325-37; DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.014.10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Ramos-Ibeas P, Calle A, Fernández-González R, Laguna-Barraza R, Pericuesta E, Calero A, Ramíréz MA, Gutiérrez-Adán A. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection using DNA fragmented sperm in mice negatively affects embryo-derived embryonic stem cells, reduces the fertility of male offspring and induces heritable changes in epialleles. PLoS ONE.2014;9:e95625; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0095625.10.1371/journal.pone.0095625Search in Google Scholar

4. Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, Spano M, Bungum L, Erenpreiss J, Giwercman A. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assistedreproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):174–9;DOI:10.1093/humrep/del326.10.1093/humrep/del326Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Huang C, Lee T, Chen C, Wu G, Lee C, Lee M. Sperm preparation by magnetic-activated cell sorting improve the sperm zona pellucida binding capacity and reduces apoptotic sperm. Hum Repro. 2009;24 Suppl 1:2147–218.Search in Google Scholar

6. Young Obejero E, De Caro R, Marconi G, Lomardi E, Young E, Tiveron M, Valcarcel A. Reproductive outcome using Annexin V columns for nonapoptoti sperm selection. Hum Reprod. 2010;25 Suppl 1:6–9.10.1093/humrep/de.25.s1.4Search in Google Scholar

7. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):998-1005; DOI:10.1016/j. fertnstert.2014.06.033.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.033Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Romany L, Garrido N, Motato Y, Belén A, Remohí J, Meseguer M. Removal of annexin V - positive cells for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in ovum donation cycles does not improve reproductive outcome: a controlled and randomized trial in unselected males. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1567-75; DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.001.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.001Search in Google Scholar

9. World Health Organization. Semen analysis. In WHO laboratory manual for the Examination and processing of human semen. Fift ed., WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland World Health Organization; 2010. p. 7-114.Search in Google Scholar

10. Said TM, Grunewald S, Paasch U, Glander HJ, Baumann T, Kriegel C, Li L, Agarwal A. Advantage of combining magnetic cell separation with sperm preparation techniques. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005a;10(ž):740-6; DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61118-2.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61118-2Search in Google Scholar

11. Said TM, Grunewald S, Paasch U, Rasch U, Agarwal A, Glander HJ. Effects of magnetic-activated cell sorting on sperm motility and cryosurvival rates. Fertil Steril. 2005b;83(5):1442–6; DOI:10.1016/j. fertnstert.2004.11.052.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.05215866582Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Tavalaee M, Deemeh, MR., Arbabian M, Nasr-Esfahani, MH. Density gradient centrifugation before or after magnetic-activated cell sorting: which technique is more useful for clinical sperm selection? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(1):31–8; DOI:10.1007/s10815-011-9686-6.10.1007/s10815-011-9686-6325240722170231Search in Google Scholar

13. De Vantéry Arrighi C, Hervé L, Chardonnens D, Agostini A. Removal of spermatozoa with externalized phosphatidylserine from sperm preparation in human assisted medical procreation: effects on viability, motility and mitochondrial membrane potential. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:1–12; DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-7-1.10.1186/1477-7827-7-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Romany L, Meseguer M, García-Herrero S, Garrido N. Magnetic activated sorting of non-apoptotic sperm result in improved embryo quality in ovum donation cycles with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2010;25 Suppl 1:8.Search in Google Scholar

15. Cakar Z, Cetinkaya B, Aras D, Ozkavukcu S, Kaplanoglu I, Cinar O. Does combining magnetic-activated cell sorting with density gradient or swim-up improve sperm selection? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(8):1059–65; DOI:10.1007/s10815-016-0742-0.10.1007/s10815-016-0742-0Search in Google Scholar

16. Chi HJ, Kwak SJ, Kim SG, Kim YY, Park JY, Yoo ChS, Park IH, Sun HG, Kim JW, Lee KH. Efficient isolation of sperm with high DNA integrity and stable chromatin packaging by a combination of density-gradient centrifugation and magnetic.activated cell sorting. Clin Exp Reprod Med.2016;43(4):199-206; DOI:10.5653/cerm.2016.43.4.199.10.5653/cerm.2016.43.4.199Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Zini A, Finelli A, Phang D, Jarvi K. Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity. Urology. 2000;56(6):1081–4.10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00770-6Search in Google Scholar

18. Grunewald S, Reinhardt M, Blumenauer V, Sai TM, Agarwal A, Abu Hmeidan F, Glander HJ, Paasch U. Increased sperm chromatin decondensation in selected nonapoptotic spermatozoa of patients with male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2009;92 (2):572–77; DOI:10.1016/j. fertnstert.2008.07.1705.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.170518823884Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Alvares Sedó C, Uriondo H, Lavolpe M, Noblia F, Papier S, Nodar F. Clinical outcome using non-apoptotic sperm selection for ICSI procedures: report of 1 year experience. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):S232; DOI:10.1016/j. fertnstert.2010.07.902.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.902Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Buzzi J, Valcarcel A, Lombardi E, Oses R, Rawe V, Young E. Magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) improves oocyte donation results associated to severe male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2010;25 Suppl 1:118–52.Search in Google Scholar

21. Dirican EK, Özgün OD, Akarsu S, Akin KO, Ercan O, Ugurlu M, Camsari C, Kanyilmaz O, Kaya A, Unsal A. Clinical outcome of magnetic activated cell sorting of nonapoptotic spermatozoa before density gradient centrifugation for assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25(8):375–81; DOI:10.1007/s10815-008-9250-1.10.1007/s10815-008-9250-1258212718810633Search in Google Scholar