Accesso libero

Rethinking the unthinkable – revisiting theories of nuclear deterrence and escalation

   | 28 dic 2018
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Aron, R. (1970). 18 Lectures on Industrial Society Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.AronR.197018 Lectures on Industrial SocietyWeidenfeld and NicholsonLondonSearch in Google Scholar

Beaufre, A. (1965). Deterrence and Strategy Faber and Faber, London.BeaufreA.1965Deterrence and StrategyFaber and FaberLondonSearch in Google Scholar

Brodie, B. (1946). Implication for Military Policy. In Brodie, B. (Ed.), The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, NY, pp. 70-110.BrodieB.1946Implication for Military PolicyBrodieB.The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World OrderHarcourt, Brace and CompanyNew York, NY70110Search in Google Scholar

Brodie, B. (1959). Strategy in the Missile Age Princeton University Press, Princeton.BrodieB.1959Strategy in the Missile AgePrinceton University PressPrinceton10.1515/9781400875108Search in Google Scholar

Brodie, B. (1966). Escalation and the Nuclear Option Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.BrodieB.1966Escalation and the Nuclear OptionPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJSearch in Google Scholar

Cimbala, S. J. (1988). Strategic war termination: The missing element. In: Cimbala, S. J., & Douglass, J. D. Jr. (eds.), Ending a Nuclear War. Are the Superpowers Prepared? Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defence Publishers, Inc, Washington, D.C, pp. 154-172.CimbalaS. J.1988Strategic war termination: The missing elementCimbalaS. J.DouglassJ. D. Jr.Ending a Nuclear War. Are the Superpowers Prepared?Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defence Publishers, IncWashington, D.C154172Search in Google Scholar

Department of Defense. (2010). Nuclear Posture Review Report April 2010. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C.Department of Defense2010Nuclear Posture Review ReportApril 2010Department of DefenseWashington, D.CSearch in Google Scholar

Dulles, J. F. (1954). The evolution of foreign policy. Department of State, Press Release, 12 January 1954.DullesJ. F.1954The evolution of foreign policyDepartment of State, Press Release12 January 1954Search in Google Scholar

Enthoven, A. C. (1965). American deterrence policy. In: Kissinger, H. A. (ed.), Problems of National Strategy – A Book of Readings Frederick A. P, Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 120-134.EnthovenA. C.1965American deterrence policyKissingerH. A.Problems of National Strategy – A Book of ReadingsFrederick A. P, PublishersNew York, NY120134Search in Google Scholar

Freedman, L. (1981). The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy Macmillan, New York, NY.FreedmanL.1981The Evolution of Nuclear StrategyMacmillanNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar

Fuller, J. F. C. (1946). Armament and History – A Study of the Influence of Armament on History from the Dawn of Classical Warfare to the Second World War Eyre & Spotiswoode, London.FullerJ. F. C.1946Armament and History – A Study of the Influence of Armament on History from the Dawn of Classical Warfare to the Second World WarEyre & SpotiswoodeLondonSearch in Google Scholar

Gallois, P. (1961). The Balance of Terror: Strategy for the Nuclear Age Houghton Mifflin Co, Boston, MA.GalloisP.1961The Balance of Terror: Strategy for the Nuclear AgeHoughton Mifflin CoBoston, MASearch in Google Scholar

Ghamari-Tabrizi, S. (2005). The Worlds of Herman Kahn – The Intuitive Science of Thermonuclar war Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Ghamari-TabriziS.2005The Worlds of Herman Kahn – The Intuitive Science of Thermonuclar warHarvard University PressCambridge, MA10.4159/9780674037564Search in Google Scholar

Gray, C. S. (1988). Strategic de-escalation. In: Cimbala, S. J., & Douglass, J. D. Jr. (eds.), Ending a Nuclear War. Are the Superpowers Prepared? Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defence Publishers, Inc, Washington, D.C, pp. 60-78.GrayC. S.1988Strategic de-escalationCimbalaS. J.DouglassJ. D. Jr.Ending a Nuclear War. Are the Superpowers Prepared?Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defence Publishers, IncWashington, D.C6078Search in Google Scholar

Halperin, M. H. (1987). Nuclear Fallacy – Dispelling the Myth of Nuclear Strategy Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA.HalperinM. H.1987Nuclear Fallacy – Dispelling the Myth of Nuclear StrategyBallinger Publishing CompanyCambridge, MASearch in Google Scholar

House of Commons. (1954). Statement on Defence, Presented by the Minister of Defence to Parliament, Command Paper #9075, February 1954. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.House of Commons1954Statement on Defence, Presented by the Minister of Defence to Parliament, Command Paper #9075, February 1954Her Majesty’s Stationery OfficeLondonSearch in Google Scholar

Kahn, H. (1960). On Thermonuclear War Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.KahnH.1960On Thermonuclear WarPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJSearch in Google Scholar

Kahn, H. (1962). Thinking About the Unthinkable Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.KahnH.1962Thinking About the UnthinkableWeidenfeld and NicolsonLondonSearch in Google Scholar

Kahn, H. (1965a). On Escalation – Metaphors and Scenarios Pall Mall Press, London.KahnH.1965aOn Escalation – Metaphors and ScenariosPall Mall PressLondonSearch in Google Scholar

Kahn, H. (1965b). Escalation as a strategy. In: Kissinger, H. A. (ed.), Problems of National Strategy – A Book of Readings Frederick A. Praeger, Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 17-33.KahnH.1965bEscalation as a strategyKissingerH. A.Problems of National Strategy – A Book of ReadingsFrederick A. Praeger, PublishersNew York, NY1733Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, H. (1984). Thinking About the Unthinkable in the 1980s Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.KahnH.1984Thinking About the Unthinkable in the 1980sSimon and SchusterNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar

Kaplan, F. M. (1980). Dubious Specter – A Skeptical Look at the Soviet Nuclear Strategy Institute for Policy Studies, Washington, D.C.KaplanF. M.1980Dubious Specter – A Skeptical Look at the Soviet Nuclear StrategyInstitute for Policy StudiesWashington, D.CSearch in Google Scholar

Kaplan, F. M. (1983). The Wizards of Armageddon Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.KaplanF. M.1983The Wizards of ArmageddonSimon and SchusterNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar

Kissinger, H. (1957). Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy Harper, New York, NY.KissingerH.1957Nuclear Weapons and Foreign PolicyHarperNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar

Kissinger, H. A. (1965). Problems of National Strategy – A Book of Readings Frederick A. Praeger, Publishers, New York, NY.KissingerH. A.1965Problems of National Strategy – A Book of ReadingsFrederick A. Praeger, PublishersNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar

Liddell Hart, Sir Basil Henry. (1960). Deterrent or Defence – A Fresh Look at the West’s Military Position Stevens & Sons Limited, London.LiddellHartSirBasil Henry.1960Deterrent or Defence – A Fresh Look at the West’s Military PositionStevens & Sons LimitedLondonSearch in Google Scholar

McNamara, R. S. (1968). The Essence of Security – Reflections in Office Hodder and Stoughton, London.McNamaraR. S.1968The Essence of Security – Reflections in OfficeHodder and StoughtonLondonSearch in Google Scholar

Nitze, P. H. (1956). Atoms, strategy and policy. Foreign Affairs, 34(2), pp. 187-198.NitzeP. H.1956Atoms, strategy and policyForeign Affairs34218719810.2307/20031154Search in Google Scholar

Pifer, S., Bush, R. C., Felbab-Brown, V., Indyk, M. S., O’Hanlon, M., & Pollack, K. M. (2010). U.S. Nuclear and Extended Deterrence: Considerations and Challenges Brookings Arms Control Series, Paper 3, May 2010.PiferS.BushR. C.Felbab-BrownV.IndykM. S.O’HanlonM.PollackK. M.2010U.S. Nuclear and Extended Deterrence: Considerations and ChallengesBrookings Arms Control SeriesPaper 3, May 2010Search in Google Scholar

Quester, G. H. (2006). Nuclear First Strike – Consequences of a Broken Taboo Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.QuesterG. H.2006Nuclear First Strike – Consequences of a Broken TabooJohns Hopkins University PressBaltimoreSearch in Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. (1963). The Strategy of Conflict Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.SchellingT. C.1963The Strategy of ConflictHarvard University PressCambridge, MASearch in Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. (1965). Nuclears, NATO and the “new strategy”. In: Kissinger, H. A. (ed.), Problems of National Strategy – A Book of Readings Frederick A. Praeger, Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 169-185.SchellingT. C.1965Nuclears, NATO and the “new strategy”KissingerH. A.Problems of National Strategy – A Book of ReadingsFrederick A. PraegerPublishers, New York, NY169185Search in Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. (1966). Arms and Influence Yale University Press, New Haven.SchellingT. C.1966Arms and InfluenceYale University PressNew HavenSearch in Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. (2008). Arms and Influence With a New Preface and Afterword. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.SchellingT. C.2008Arms and Influence. With a New Preface and AfterwordYale University PressNew Haven and LondonSearch in Google Scholar

Sloss, L. (1988). Flexible targeting, escalation control, and U.S. options. In: Cimbala, S. J., & Douglass, J. D. Jr. (eds.), Ending a Nuclear War. Are the Superpowers Prepared? Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defence Publishers, Inc, Washington, D.C, pp. 1-9.SlossL.1988Flexible targeting, escalation control, and U.S. optionsCimbalaS. J.DouglassJ. D. Jr.Ending a Nuclear War. Are the Superpowers Prepared?Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defence PublishersInc, Washington, D.C19Search in Google Scholar

Sokolski, H. D. (2016). Underestimated: Our Not So Peaceful Nuclear Future United States Army War College Press, Carslie, PA.SokolskiH. D.2016Underestimated: Our Not So Peaceful Nuclear FutureUnited States Army War College PressCarslie, PASearch in Google Scholar

Stein, J. G. (1985). Calculation, miscalculation and conventional deterrence II: The view from Jerusalem. In: Jervis, R., Lebow, R. N., & Stein, J. G. (eds.), Psychology of Deterrence The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, pp. 60-88.SteinJ. G.1985Calculation, miscalculation and conventional deterrence II: The view from JerusalemJervisR.LebowR. N.SteinJ. G.Psychology of DeterrenceThe Johns Hopkins University PressBaltimore and London6088Search in Google Scholar

Teller, E. (1962). The Legacy of Hiroshima Doubleday & Company, Garden City, NY.TellerE.1962The Legacy of HiroshimaDoubleday & CompanyGarden City, NY10.1063/1.3058270Search in Google Scholar

Van Cleave, W. R., & Cohen, S. T. (1978). Tactical Nuclear Weapons – An Examination of the Issues MacDonald and Jane’s, London.VanCleaveRW.CohenS.T.1978Tactical Nuclear Weapons – An Examination of the IssuesMacDonald and Jane’sLondonSearch in Google Scholar

Vegetius. (1985). De Re Militari. In: Phillips, T. R. (ed.), Roots of Strategy Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA, pp. 65-176.Vegetius1985De Re MilitariPhillipsT. R.Roots of StrategyStackpole BooksHarrisburg, PA65176Search in Google Scholar

von Moltke, H. (1993). In: Hughes, D. J. (ed.), On the Art of War – Selected Writings Ballantine Books, New York, NY.von MoltkeH.1993HughesD. J.On the Art of War – Selected WritingsBallantine BooksNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar

Wohlstetter, A. (1958). The Delicate Balance of Terror. P-1472, 6 November 1958. Revised December 1958. RAND Paper. Available at https://www.rand.org/about/history/wohlstetter/P1472/P1472.htmlWohlstetterA.1958The Delicate Balance of TerrorP-1472, 6 November 1958. Revised December 1958. RAND Paper. Available athttps://www.rand.org/about/history/wohlstetter/P1472/P1472.html10.1007/978-1-349-19791-0_12Search in Google Scholar

Wohlstetter, A. (1960). No Highway to High Purpose. P-2084-RC, June 1960. RAND Paper. https://www.rand.org/about/history/wohlstetter/P2084/P2084.htmlWohlstetterA.1960No Highway to High PurposeP-2084-RC, June 1960. RAND Paperhttps://www.rand.org/about/history/wohlstetter/P2084/P2084.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Wohlstetter, A., & Rowen, H. (1959). Objectives of the United States Military Posture. RM-2373, 1 May 1959. RAND Research Memorandum. Available at https://www.rand.org/about/history/wohlstetter/RM2373/RM2373.htmlWohlstetterA.RowenH.1959Objectives of the United States Military PostureRM-2373, 1 May 1959. RAND Research MemorandumAvailable athttps://www.rand.org/about/history/wohlstetter/RM2373/RM2373.html10.7249/RM2373Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1799-3350
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
Volume Open
Argomenti della rivista:
History, Topics in History, Military History, Social Sciences, Political Science, Military Policy