[1. Gornall J, Betts R, Burke E, Clark R, Camp J, Willet K, Wiltshire A. Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century. Phil. Trans R Soc B 2010;365:2973-89. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.015810.1098/rstb.2010.0158]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Alexandrov V, Eitzinger J, Cajic V, Oberforster M. Potential impact of climate change on selected agricultural crops in north-eastern Austria. Global Change Biol 2002;8:372-89. doi: 10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00484.x10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00484.x]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Mittler R, Finka A, Goloubinoff P. How do plants feel the heat? Trends Biochem Sci 2012;37:118-25. doi: 10.1016/j. tibs.2011.11.007.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Nriagu JO, Pacyna JM. Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals. Nature 1988;333:134-9. doi: 10.1038/333134a010.1038/333134a0]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Woolson EA, Axley JH, Kearney PC. The chemistry and phytotoxicity of arsenic in soils: I. Contaminated field soils.Soil Sci Soc Am J 1971;35:938-43.10.2136/sssaj1971.03615995003500060027x]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Meharg AA, Rahman M. Arsenic contamination of Bangladesh paddy field soils: implications for rice contribution to arsenic consumption. Environ Sci Technol 2003;37:229-34. doi: 10.1021/es025984210.1021/es0259842]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Camargo JA, Ward JV. Short-term toxicity of sodium nitrate (NaNO3) to non-target freshwater invertebrates. Chemosphere 1992;24:23-8. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(92)90563-710.1016/0045-6535(92)90563-7]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Tilman D. Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: The need for sustainable and efficient practices.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:5995-6000. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.96.11.599510.1073/pnas.96.11.5995]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Kassir LN, Lartiges B, Ouaini N. Effects of fertilizer industry emissions on local soil contamination: a case study of a phosphate plant on the east Mediterranean coast. Environ T e c h n o l 2 0 1 2 ; 3 3 : 8 7 3 - 8 5 . d o i : 10.1080/09593330.2011.601765]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Nicholson FA, Smith SR, Alloway BJ, Carlton-Smith C, Chambers BJ. An inventory of heavy metals inputs to agricultural soils in England and Wales. Sci Total Environ 2003;311:205-19. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00139-610.1016/S0048-9697(03)00139-6]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Satarug S, Baker JR, Urbenjapol S, Haswell-Elkins M, Reilly PEB, Williams DJ. A global perspective on cadmium pollution and toxicity in non-occupationally exposed population. Toxicol Lett 2003;137:65-83. PMID: 1250543310.1016/S0378-4274(02)00381-8]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Di Toopi LS, Gabrielli R. Response to cadmium in higher plants. Environ Exp Bot 1999;41:105-30.10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00058-6]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Siedlecka A. Some aspects of interactions between heavy metals and plant mineral nutrients. Acta Soc Bot Pol 1995;64:265-72.10.5586/asbp.1995.035]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Hänsch R, Mendel RR. Physiological functions of mineral micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Ni, Mo, B, Cl). Curr Opin Plant Biol 2009;12:259-66. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.00610.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.006]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Saidi Y, Finka A, Goloubinoff P. Heat perception and signalling. Response to cadmium in plants: a tortuous path to thermotolerance. New Phytol 2011;190:556-65.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03571.x]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I. Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1998;49:643-68. PMID: 1501224910.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.643]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Rugh CL, Senecoff JF, Meagher RB, Merkle SA. Development of transgenic yellow poplar for mercury phytoremediation.Nature Biotechnol 1998;16:925-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt1098-92510.1038/nbt1098-925]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Jung MC, Thorton I. Heavy metal contamination of soils and plants in the vicinity of a lead-zinc mine, Korea. Appl Geochem 1996;11:53-9. doi: 10.1016/0883-2927(95)00075-510.1016/0883-2927(95)00075-5]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Liao XY, Chen TB, Xie H, Liu YR. Soil As contamination and its risk assessment in areas near the industrial districts of Chenzhou City, Southern China. Environ Int 2005;31:791-8. PMID: 1597972010.1016/j.envint.2005.05.03015979720]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Schützendübel A, Polle A. Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal - induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization. J Exp Bot 2002;53:1351-65. doi: 10.1093/ jexbot/53.372.135110.1093/jxb/53.372.1351]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Clemens S. Toxic metal accumulation, responses to exposure and mechanisms of tolerance in plants. Biochimie 2006;88:1707-19. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.07.00310.1016/j.biochi.2006.07.00316914250]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Rogers S, Girolami M, Kolch W, Waters KM, Liu T, Thrall B, Wiley HS. Investigating the correspondence between transcriptomic and proteomic expression profiles using coupled cluster models. Bioinformatics 2008;24:2894-900.10.1093/bioinformatics/btn55310.1093/bioinformatics/btn553414163818974169]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Krämer U, Clemens S. Molecular biology of metal homeostasis and detoxification. In: Tamäs M, Martinoia E, editors. Topics in current genetics. New York (NY): Springer Verlag; 2005. p. 216-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Bona E, Marsano F, Cavaletto M, Berta G. Proteomic characterization of copper stress response in Cannabis sativa roots. Proteomics 2007;7:1121-30. doi: 10.1002/ pmic.20060071210.1002/pmic.20060071217352425]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Kieffer P, Dommes J, Hoffmann L, Hausman JF, Renaut J.Quantitative changes in protein expression of cadmiumexposed poplar plants. Proteomics 2008;8:2514-30. doi: 10.1002/pmic.20070111010.1002/pmic.20070111018563750]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Kieffer P, Planchon S, Oufir M, Ziebel J, Dommes J, Hoffmann L. Combining proteomics and metabolite analyses to unravel cadmium stress-response in poplar leaves. J Proteome Res 2009;8:400-17. doi: 10.1021/pr800561r10.1021/pr800561r19072159]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Giordano PM, Mortvedt J, Mays A. Effect of municipal wastes on crop yields and uptake of heavy metals. J Environ Q u a l 1 9 7 5 ; 4 : 3 9 4 - 9 . d o i : 1 0 . 2 1 3 4 / jeq1975.00472425000400030024x]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Islam E, Yang X, He Z, Mahmood Q. Assessing potential dietary toxicity of heavy metals in selected vegetables and food crops. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2007;8:1-13. doi: 10.1631/ jzus.2007.B000110.1631/jzus.2007.B0001176492417173356]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Fu J, Zhou Q, Liu J, Liu W, Wang T, Zhang Q, Jiang G. High levels of heavy metals in rice (Oryza sativa L.) from a typical E-waste recycling area in southeast China and its potential risk to human health. Chemosphere 2008;71:1269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.06510.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.06518289635]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Hossain Z, Komatsu S. Contribution of proteomic studies towards understanding plant heavy metal stress response.Front Plant Sci 2013;3:310. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.0031010.3389/fpls.2012.00310355511823355841]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Clemens S. Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis. Planta 2001;212:475-86. PMID: 1152550410.1007/s00425000045811525504]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Sharma SK, Goloubinoff P, Christen P. Heavy metal ions are potent inhibitors of protein folding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008;372:341-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.05210.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.05218501191]Search in Google Scholar
[33. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000;408:796-815. doi: 10.1038/3504869210.1038/3504869211130711]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Rensing SA, Lang D, Zimmer AD, Terry A, Salamov A, Shapiro H, Nishiyama T, Perroud PF, Lindquist EA, Kamisugi Y, Tanahashi T, Sakakibara K, Fujita T, Oishi K, Shin-I T, Kuroki Y, Toyoda A, Suzuki Y, Hashimoto S, Yamaguchi K, Sugano S, Kohara Y, Fujiyama A, Anterola A, Aoki S, Ashton N, Barbazuk WB, Barker E, Bennetzen JL, Blankenship R, Cho SH, Dutcher SK, Estelle M, Fawcett JA, Gundlach H, Hanada K, Heyl A, Hicks KA, Hughes J, Lohr M, Mayer K, Melkozernov A, Murata T, Nelson DR, Pils B, Prigge M, Reiss B, Renner T, Rombauts S, Rushton PJ, Sanderfoot A, Schween G, Shiu SH, Stueber K, Theodoulou FL, Tu H, Van de Peer Y, Verrier PJ, Waters E, Wood A, Yang L, Cove D, Cuming AC, Hasebe M, Lucas S, Mishler BD, Reski R, Grigoriev IV, Quatrano RS, Boore JL.The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science 2008;319:64-9. doi: 10.1126/science.115064610.1126/science.115064618079367]Search in Google Scholar
[35. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project. The mapbased sequence of the rice genome. Nature 2005;436:793-800. doi: 10.1038/nature0389510.1038/nature03895]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Phytozome [displayed 16 January 2014]. Available at http:// www.phytozome.com]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Cambridge Healhtech Institute. -Omes and -omics glossary & taxonomy [displayed 16 January 2014]. Available at http:// www.genomicglossaries.com/content/omes.asp]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Ahsan N, Renaut J, Komatsu S. Recent developments in the application of proteomics to the analysis of plant responses to heavy metals. Proteomics 2009;9:2602-21. doi: 10.1002/ pmic.20080093510.1002/pmic.200800935]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Anderson L, Seilhamer J. A comparison of selected mRNA and protein abundances in human liver. Electrophoresis 1997;18:533-7. PMID: 915093710.1002/elps.1150180333]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Crosatti C, Guerra D, Stanca AM, Cattivelli L. Abiotic stress response in plants: When post-transcriptional and post-translational regulations control transcription. Plant Sci 2008;174:420-31. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.02.00 ]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Hakeem KR, Chandna R, Ahmad P, Iqbal M, Ozturk M.Relevance of proteomic investigations in plant abiotic stress physiology. OMICS 2012;16:621-35. doi: 10.1089/ omi.2012.004110.1089/omi.2012.0041]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Cobon GS. Verrills N., Papakostopoulos P, Eastwood H, Linnane AW. The proteomics of ageing. Biogerontology 2002;3:133-6. doi: 10.1023/A:101524030428710.1023/A:1015240304287]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Hirano H, Islam N, Kawasaki H. Techical aspects of functional proteomics in plants. Phytochemistry 2004;65:1487-9. PMID: 1527644610.1016/j.phytochem.2004.05.019]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Timperio AM, Egidi MG, Zolla L. Proteomics applied on plant abiotic stresses: Role of heat shock proteins (HSP). J P r o t e o m i c s 2 0 0 8 ; 7 1 : 3 9 1 - 4 11 . d o i : 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . jprot.2008.07.005]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Swinbanks D. Government backs proteome proposal. Nature 1995;378:653. doi: 10.1038/378653a010.1038/378653a0]Search in Google Scholar
[46. de Hoog CL, Mann M. Proteomics. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2004;5:267-93. doi: 10.1146/annurev. genom.4.070802.110305]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J, Clijsters H. The redox status of plant cells (AsA and GSH) is sensitive to zinc imposed oxidative stress in roots and primary leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Physiol Biochem 2001;39:657-64. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(01)01276-110.1016/S0981-9428(01)01276-1]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Aravind P, Prasad MNV. Zinc alleviates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Ceratophyllum demersum L.: a free floating freshwater macrophyte. Plant Physiol Biochem 2003;41:391-7. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00035-410.1016/S0981-9428(03)00035-4]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Horvat T, Vidaković-Cifrek Ž, Oreščanin V, Tkalec M, Pevalek- Kozlina B. Toxicity assessment of heavy metal mixtures by Lemna minor L. Sci Total Environ 2007;384:229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.00710.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.00717610935]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Gratão PL, Monteiro CC, Antunes AM, Peres LEP, Azevedo RA. Acquired tolerance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Micro-Tom) plants to cadmium induced stress. Ann Appl B i o l 2 0 0 8 ; 1 5 3 : 3 2 1 - 3 3 . d o i : 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00299.x]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Tkalec M, Prebeg T, Roje V, Pevalek-Kozlina, Ljubešić N.Cadmium induced responses in duckweed Lemna minor L.Acta Physiol Plant 2008;30:881-90. doi: 10.1007/s11738-008-0194-y10.1007/s11738-008-0194-y]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Hassan MJ, Zhang G, Wu F, Wie K, Chen Z. Zinc alleviates growth inhibition and oxidative stress caused by cadmium in rice. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 2005;168:255-61. doi: 10.1002/ jpln.20042040310.1002/jpln.200420403]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Cvjetko P, Tolić S, Šikić S, Balen B, Tkalec M, Vidaković- Cifrek Ž, Pavlica M. Effect of copper on the toxicity and genotoxicity of cadmium in duckweed (Lemna minor L.) Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2010;61:287-96. doi: 10.2478/10004-1254-61-2010-205910.2478/10004-1254-61-2010-205920860969]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Balen B, Tkalec M, Šikić S, Tolić S, Cvjetko P, Pavlica M, Vidaković-Cifrek Ž. Biochemical responses of Lemna minor experimentally exposed to cadmium and zinc. Ecotoxicology 2011;20:815-26. doi: 10.1007/s10646-011-0633-110.1007/s10646-011-0633-121416111]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Ahsan N, Lee DG, Kim KH, Alam I, Lee SH, Lee KW, Lee H, Lee BH. Analysis of arsenic stress-induced differentially expressed proteins in rice leaves by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry.Chemosphere 2010;78:224-31. doi: 10.1016/j. chemosphere.2009.11.004]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Ahsan N, Lee DG, Alam I, Kim PJ, Lee JJ, Ahn YO, Kwak SS, Lee I-J, Bahk JD, Kang KY, Renaut J, Komatsu S, Lee BH. Comparative proteomic study of arsenic-induced differentially expressed proteins in rice roots reveals glutathione plays a central role during As stress. Proteomics 2008;8:3561-76. doi: 10.1002/pmic.20070118910.1002/pmic.20070118918752204]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Ahsan N, Lee SH, Lee DG, Lee H, Lee SW, Bahk JD, Lee BH. Physiological and protein profiles alternation of germinating rice seedlings exposed to acute cadmium toxicity. C R Biol 2007;330:735-46. PMID: 1790539310.1016/j.crvi.2007.08.00117905393]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Ahsan N, Lee DG, Lee SH, Kang KY, Lee JJ, Kim PJ, Yoon HS, Kim JS, Lee BH. Excess copper induced physiological and proteomic changes in germinating rice seeds.Chemosphere 2007;67:1182-93. doi: 10.1016/j. chemosphere.2006.10.075]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Fecht-Christoffers MM, Braun HP, Lemaitre-Guillier C, Van Dorsselaer A, Horst WJ. Effect of manganese toxicity on the proteome of the leaf apoplast in cowpea. Plant Physiol 2003;133:1935-46. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.02921510.1104/pp.103.02921530074514605229]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Führs H, Hartwig M, Molina LE, Heintz D, Van Dorsselaer A, Braun HP, Horst WJ. Early manganese-toxicity response in Vigna unguiculata L. - a proteomic and transcriptomic study. Proteomics 2008;8:149-59. doi: 10.1002/ pmic.20070047810.1002/pmic.20070047818095375]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Hossain Z, Hajika M, Komatsu S. Comparative proteome analysis of high and low cadmium accumulating soybeans under cadmium stress. Amino Acids 2012;43:2393-416. doi: 10.1007/s00726-012-1319-610.1007/s00726-012-1319-622588482]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Lee K, Bae DW, Kim SH, Han HJ, Liu X, Park HC, Lim CO, Lee SY, Chung WS. Comparative proteomic analysis of the short-term responses of rice roots and leaves to cadmium. J Plant Physiol 2010;167:161-8. doi: 10.1016/j. jplph.2009.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Pandey S, Rai R, Rai LC. Proteomics combines morphological, physiological and biochemical attributes to unravel the survival strategy of Anabaena sp.PCC7120 under arsenic stress. J Proteomics 2012;75:921-37. doi: 10.1016/j. jprot.2011.10.011]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Requejo R, Tena M. Maize response to acute arsenic toxicity as revealed by proteome analysis of plant shoots. Proteomics 2006;6(Suppl 1):S156-62. PMID: 1653474610.1002/pmic.20050038116534746]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Sarry JE, Kuhn L, Ducruix C, Lafaye A, Junot C, Hugouvieux V, Jourdain A, Bastien O, Fievet JB, Vailhen D, Amekraz B, Moulin C, Ezan E, Garin J, Bourguignon J. The early responses of Arabidopsis thaliana cells to cadmium exposure explored by protein and metabolite profiling analyses.Proteomics 2006;6:2180-98. doi: 10.1002/pmic.20050054310.1002/pmic.20050054316502469]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Semane B, Dupae J, Cuypers A, Noben JP, Tuomainen M, Tervahauta A, Kärenlampi S, Van Belleghem F, Smeets K, Vangronsveld J. Leaf proteome responses of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to mild cadmium stress. J Plant Physiol 2010;167:247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.09.01510.1016/j.jplph.2009.09.01520005002]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Zhou S, Sauvé R, Thannhauser TW. Proteome changes induced by aluminium stress in tomato roots. J Exp Bot 2009;60:1849-57. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp06510.1093/jxb/erp06519336389]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Ahsan N, NakamuraT, Komatsu S. Differential responses of microsomal proteins and metabolites in two contrasting cadmium (Cd) accumulating soybean cultivars under Cd stress. Amino Acids 2012;42:317-27. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0809-710.1007/s00726-010-0809-721107622]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Hossain Z, Makino T, Komatsu S. Proteomic study of β-aminobutyric acid-mediated cadmium stress alleviation in soybean. J Proteomics 2012;75:4151-64. doi: 10.1016/j. jprot.2012.05.037 ]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Hradilová J, Rehulka P, Rehulková H, Vrbová M, Griga M, Brzobohatý B. Comparative analysis of proteomic changes in contrasting flax cultivars upon cadmium exposure.Electrophoresis 2010;31:421-31. doi: 10.1002/ elps.20090047710.1002/elps.20090047720084635]Search in Google Scholar
[71. Duressa D, Soliman K, Taylor R, Senwo Z. Proteomic analysis of soybean roots under aluminum stress international.Int J Plant Genomics 2011;2011:2825-31. doi: 10.1155/2011/28253110.1155/2011/282531309250921577316]Search in Google Scholar
[72. Cho K, Torres NL, Subramanyam S, Deepak SA, Sardesai N, Han O, Williams CE, Ishii H, Iwahashi H, Rakwal R.Protein extraction/solubilization protocol for monocot and dicot plant gel-based proteomics. J Plant Biol 2006;49:413-20. doi: 10.1007/BF0303112010.1007/BF03031120]Search in Google Scholar
[73. Rose JKC, Bashir S, Giovannoni JJ, Jahn MM, Saravanan RS. Tackling the plant proteome: practical approaches, hurdles and experimental tools. Plant J 2004;39:715-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02182.x10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02182.x15315634]Search in Google Scholar
[74. Jellouli N, Salem AB, Ghorbel A, Jouira HB. Evaluation of protein extraction methods for Vitis vinifera leaf and root. J I n t e g r P l a n t B i o l 2 0 1 0 ; 5 2 : 9 3 3 - 4 0 . d o i : 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010. 00973.x]Search in Google Scholar
[75. Isaacson T, Damasceno CM, Saravanan RS, He Y, Catalá C, Saladié M, Rose JK. Sample extraction techniques for enhanced proteomic analysis of plant tissues. Nat Protoc 2006;1:769-74. PMID: 1740630610.1038/nprot.2006.10217406306]Search in Google Scholar
[76. Nouri MZ, Komatsu S. Comparative analysis of soybean plasma membrane proteins under osmotic stress using gelbased and LC MS/MS-based proteomics approaches.Proteomics 2010;10:1930-45. doi: 10.1002/pmic.20090063210.1002/pmic.20090063220209511]Search in Google Scholar
[77. Pavoković D, Križnik B, Krsnik-Rasol M. Evaluation of protein extraction methods for proteomic analysis of nonmodel recalcitrant plant tissues. Croat Chem Acta 2012;85:177-83. doi: 10.5562/cca180410.5562/cca1804]Search in Google Scholar
[78. Komatsu S. Ahsan N. Soybean proteomics and its application to functional analysis. J Proteomics 2009;72:325-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2008.10.00110.1016/j.jprot.2008.10.00119022415]Search in Google Scholar
[79. Sarma AD, Oehrle, NW, Emerich DW. Plant protein isolation and stabilization for enhanced resolution of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anal Biochem 2008;379:192-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.04.04710.1016/j.ab.2008.04.04718510937]Search in Google Scholar
[80. Alvarez S, Berla BM, Sheffield J, Cahoon RE, Jez JM, Hicks LM. Comprehensive analysis of the Brassica juncea root proteome in response to cadmium exposure by complementary proteomic approaches. Proteomics 2009;9:2419-31. doi: 10.1002/pmic.20080047810.1002/pmic.20080047819343712]Search in Google Scholar
[81. Vannini C, Marsoni M, Domingo G, Antognoni F, Biondi S, Bracale M. Proteomic analysis of chromate-induced modifications in Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata.Chemosphere 2009;76:1372-9. doi: 10.1016/j. chemosphere.2009.06.022]Search in Google Scholar
[82. Ritter A, Ubertini M, Romac S, Gaillard F, Delage L, Mann A, Cock JM, Tonon T, Correa JA, Potin P. Copper stress proteomics highlights local adaptation of two strains of the model brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus. Proteomics 2010;10:2074-88. doi: 10.1002/pmic.20090000410.1002/pmic.20090000420373519]Search in Google Scholar
[83. Rodríguez-Celma J, Rellán-Alvarez R, Abadía A, Abadía J, López-Millán AF. Changes induced by two levels of cadmium toxicity in the 2-DE protein profile of tomato roots.J Proteomics 2010;73:1694-706. doi: 10.1016/j. jprot.2010.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[84. Sharmin SA, Alam I, Kim KH, Kim YG, Kim PJ, Bahk JD, Lee BH. Chromium-induced physiological and proteomic alterations in roots of Miscanthus sinensis. Plant Sci 2012;187:113-26. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.02.00210.1016/j.plantsci.2012.02.00222404839]Search in Google Scholar
[85. Komatsu S, Wada T, Abaléa Y, Nouri MZ, Nanjo Y, Nakayama N, Shimamura S, Yamamoto R, Nakamura T, Furukawa K. Analysis of plasma membrane proteome in soybean and application to flooding stress response. J Proteome Res 2009;8:4487-99. doi: 10.1021/pr900288310.1021/pr900288319658398]Search in Google Scholar
[86. Agrawal GK, Bourguignon J, Rolland N, Ephritikhine G, Ferro M, Jaquinod M, Alexiou KG, Chardot T, Chakraborty N, Jolivet P, Doonan JH, Rakwal R. Plant organelle proteomics: Collaborating for optimal cell function. Mass Spectrom Rev 2011;30:I 772-853. doi: 10.1002/mas.2030110.1002/mas.2030121038434]Search in Google Scholar
[87. Eubel H, Braun HP and A Millar H. Blue-native PAGE in plants: a tool in analysis of protein-protein interactions. Plant Methods 2005;1:11. PMID: 1628751010.1186/1746-4811-1-11130886016287510]Search in Google Scholar
[88. Xi J, Wang X, Li S, Zhou X, Yue L, Fan J, Hao D. Polyethylene glycol fractionation improved detection of low-abundant proteins by two dimensional electrophoresis analysis of plant proteome. Phytochemistry 2006;67:2341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.08.00510.1016/j.phytochem.2006.08.00516973185]Search in Google Scholar
[89. Baracat-Pereira MC, de Oliveira Barbosa M, Magalhães Júnior MJ, Carrijo LC, Games PD, Almeida HO, Sena Netto JF, Rodrigues Pereira M, de Barros EG. Separomics applied to the proteomics and peptidomics of low-abundance proteins: Choice of methods and challenges - A review. Gen Mol Biol 2012;35:283-91. doi: 10.1590/S1415-4757201200020000910.1590/S1415-47572012000200009339288022802713]Search in Google Scholar
[90. Cho J-H, Hwang H, Cho M-H, Kwon Y-K, Jeon J-S, Bhoo SH, Hahn T-R. The effect of DTT in protein preparations for proteomic analysis: removal of a highly abundant plant enzyme, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. J Plant Biol 2008;51:297-301. doi: 10.1007/BF0303613010.1007/BF03036130]Search in Google Scholar
[91. Krishnan HB, Natarajan SS. A rapid method for depletion of Rubisco from soybean (Glycine max) leaf for proteomic analysis of lower abundance proteins. Phytochemistry 2009;70:1958-64. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.08.02010.1016/j.phytochem.2009.08.02019766275]Search in Google Scholar
[92. Natarajan SS, Krishnan HB, Lakshman S, Garrett WM. An efficient extraction method to enhance analysis of low abundant proteins from soybean seed. Anal Biochem 2009;394:259-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.07.04810.1016/j.ab.2009.07.04819651100]Search in Google Scholar
[93. Vertommen A, Møller AL, Cordewenerd JHG, Swennen R, Panis B, Finnie C, America AHP, Carpentiera SC. A workflow for peptide-based proteomics in a poorly sequenced plant: A case study on the plasma membrane proteome of banana.J Proteomics 2011;74:1218-29. doi: 10.1016/j. jprot.2011.02.008]Search in Google Scholar
[94. Azarkan M, Huet J, Baeyens-Volant D, Looze Y, Vandenbussche G. Affinity chromatography: A useful tool in proteomics studies. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007;849:81-90. PMID: 1711336810.1016/j.jchromb.2006.10.05617113368]Search in Google Scholar
[95. Fang X, Zhang W. Affinity separation and enrichment methods in proteomic analysis. J Proteomics 2008;71:284-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2008.06.01110.1016/j.jprot.2008.06.01118619565]Search in Google Scholar
[96. Fröhlich A, Lindermayr C. Deep insights into the plant proteome by pretreatment with combinatorial hexapeptide ligand libraries. J Proteomics 2011;74:1182-9. doi: 10.1016/j. jprot.2011.02.019]Search in Google Scholar
[97. Fröhlich A, Gaupels F, Sarioglu H, Holzmeister C, Spannagl M, Durner J, Lindermayr C. Looking deep inside: Detection of low-abundance proteins in leaf extracts of Arabidopsis and phloem exudates of pumpkin. Plant Physiol 2012;159:902-14. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.19807710.1104/pp.112.198077338771522555880]Search in Google Scholar
[98. Gallagher SR. One-dimensional SDS gel electrophoresis of proteins. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2006;75:10.2.1-10.2A.37. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1002as7510.1002/0471142727.mb1002as7518265373]Search in Google Scholar
[99. Klose J. From 2-D electrophoresis to proteomics.Electrophoresis 2009;30:S142-9. doi: 10.1002/ elps.20090011810.1002/elps.20090011819517494]Search in Google Scholar
[100. Peharec Štefanić P, Šikić S, Cvjetko P, Balen B. Cadmium and zinc induced similar changes in protein and glycoprotein patterns in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) seedlings and plants. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2012;63:321-35. doi: 10.2478/10004-1254-63-2012-217310.2478/10004-1254-63-2012-217323152382]Search in Google Scholar
[101. Gallagher SR. One-dimensional SDS gel electrophoresis of proteins. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 2007;37:6.1.1-6.1.38. 10.1002/0471143030.cb0601s3710.1002/0471143030.cb0601s37]Search in Google Scholar
[102. O’Farrell PH. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis. J Biol Chem 1975;250:4007-21. PMID: 23630810.1016/S0021-9258(19)41496-8]Search in Google Scholar
[103. Friedman D, Hoving S, Westmeier R. Isoelectric focusing and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Methods Enymol 2009;463:515-40. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)63030-510.1016/S0076-6879(09)63030-5]Search in Google Scholar
[104. Bjellqvist B, Ek K, Righetti GP, Gianazza E, Görg A, Westermeier R, Postel W. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: principle, methodology and some applications. J Biochem Biophys Methods 1982;6:317-39. PMID: 714266010.1016/0165-022X(82)90013-6]Search in Google Scholar
[105. Ünlü M, Morgan ME, Minden JS. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 1997;18:2071-7. doi: 10.1002/elps.115018113310.1002/elps.1150181133]Search in Google Scholar
[106. Tonge R, Shaw J, Middleton B, Rowlinson R, Rayner S, Young J, Posgnan F, Hawkins E, Currie I, Davison M. Validation and development of fluorescence two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis proteomics technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Proteomics 2001;1:377-96. PMID: 1168088410.1002/1615-9861(200103)1:3<377::AID-PROT377>3.0.CO;2-6]Search in Google Scholar
[107. Schägger H, von Jagow G. Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form. Anal Biochem 1991;199:223-31. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(91)90094-a10.1016/0003-2697(91)90094-A]Search in Google Scholar
[108. Schägger H, Cramer W A, von Jagow G. Analysis of molecular masses and oligomeric states of protein complexes by blue native electrophoresis and isolation of membrane protein complexes by two-dimensional native electrophoresis.Anal Biochem 1994;217:220-30. doi: 10.1006/ abio.1994.111210.1006/abio.1994.1112]Search in Google Scholar
[109. Reisinger V, Eichacker LA. Analysis of membrane protein complexes by Blue Native PAGE. Proteomics 2006;6(Suppl 2):6-15. PMID: 1703179910.1002/pmic.200600553]Search in Google Scholar
[110. Nijtmans LG, Henderson NS, Holt IJ. Blue native electrophoresis to study mitochondrial and other protein complexes. Methods 2002;26:327-34. PMID: 1205492310.1016/S1046-2023(02)00038-5]Search in Google Scholar
[111. Führs H, Behrens C, Gallien S, Heintz D, Van Dorsselaer A, Braun HP, Horst WJ. Physiological and proteomic characterization of manganese sensitivity and tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa) in comparison with barley (Hordeum vulgare). Ann Bot 2010;105:1129-40. doi: 10.1093/aob/ mcq046]Search in Google Scholar
[112. Fagioni M, D’Amici GM, Timperio AM, Zolla L. Proteomic analysis of multiprotein complexes in the thylakoid membrane upon cadmium treatment. J Proteome Res 2009;8:310-26. doi: 10.1021/pr800507x10.1021/pr800507x19035790]Search in Google Scholar
[113. GelAnalyzer [displayed 20 January 2014]. Available at http:// www.gelanalyzer.com]Search in Google Scholar
[114. GelScape [displayed 20 January 2014]. Available at http:// www.gelscape.ualberta.ca]Search in Google Scholar
[115. Li F, Shi J, Shen C, Chen G, Hu S, Chen Y. Proteomic characterization of copper stress response in Elsholtzia splendens roots and leaves. Plant Mol Biol 2009;71:251-63. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9521-y10.1007/s11103-009-9521-y19629718]Search in Google Scholar
[116. Zhang H, Lian C, Shen Z. Proteomic identification of small, copper-responsive proteins in germinating embryos of Oryza sativa. Ann Bot 2009;103:923-30. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp01210.1093/aob/mcp012270789519201764]Search in Google Scholar
[117. Duquesnoy I, Goupil P, Nadaud I, Branlard G, Piquet- Pissaloux A, Ledoigt G. Identification of Agrostis tenuis leaf proteins in response to As(V) and As(III) induced stress using a proteomics approach. Plant Sci 2009;176:206-13. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.10.00810.1016/j.plantsci.2008.10.008]Search in Google Scholar
[118. Zhen Y, Qi JL, Wang SS, Su J, Xu GH, Zhang MS, Miao L, Peng XX, Tian D, Yang YH. Comparative proteome analysis of differentially expressed proteins induced by Al toxicity in soybean. Physiol Plant 2007;131:542-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00979.x10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00979.x18251846]Search in Google Scholar
[119. Yang Q, Wang Y, Zhang J, Shi W, Qian C, Peng X.Identification of aluminium-responsive proteins in rice roots by a proteomic approach: cysteine synthase as a key player in Al response. Proteomics 2007;7:737-49. PMID:1729535710.1002/pmic.20060070317295357]Search in Google Scholar
[120. Wang R, Gao F, Guo BQ, Huang JC, Wang L, Zhou YJ.Short-term chromium-stress-induced alterations in the maize leaf proteome. Int J Mol Sci 2013;14:11125-44. doi: 10.3390/ ijms14061112510.3390/ijms140611125370972323712354]Search in Google Scholar
[121. Alves M, Moes S, Jenö P, Pinheiro C, Passarinho J, Ricardo CP. The analysis of Lupinus albus root proteome revealed cytoskeleton altered features due to long-term boron deficiency. J Proteomics 2011;74:1351-63. doi: 10.1016/j. jprot.2011.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[122. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann M. Stable isotope labelling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002;1:376-86. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M200025-MCP20010.1074/mcp.M200025-MCP20012118079]Search in Google Scholar
[123. Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, Williamson B, Parker K, Hattan S, Khainovski N, Pillai S, Dey S, Daniels S, Purkayastha S, Juhasz P, Martin S, Bartlet-Jones M, He F, Jacobson A, Pappin DJ. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004;3:1154-69. PMID:1538560010.1074/mcp.M400129-MCP20015385600]Search in Google Scholar
[124. Smaczniak C, Li N, Boeren S, America T, van Dongen W, Goerdayal SS, de Vries S, Angenent GC, Kaufmann K.Proteomics-based identification of low-abundance signalling and regulatory protein complexes in native plant tissues.Nature Protocols 2012;7:2144-58. doi: 10.1038/ nprot.2012.12910.1038/nprot.2012.12923196971]Search in Google Scholar
[125. Schütz W, Hausmann N, Krug K, Hampp R, Macek B. Extending SILAC to proteomics of plant cell lines. Plant Cell 2011;23:1701-5. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.08201610.1105/tpc.110.082016312394121540437]Search in Google Scholar
[126. Lucker J, Laszczak M, Smith D, Lund ST. Generation of a predicted protein database from EST data and application to iTRAQ analyses in grape (Vitis vinifera cv Cabernet Sauvignon) berries at ripening initiation. BMC Genomics 2009;10:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-5010.1186/1471-2164-10-50263789619171055]Search in Google Scholar
[127. Arike L, Valgepea K, Peil L, Nahku R, Adamberg K, Vilu R. Comparison and applications of label-free absolute proteome quantification methods on Escherichia coli. J Proteomics 2012;75:5437-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.06.02010.1016/j.jprot.2012.06.02022771841]Search in Google Scholar
[128. Thelen JJ, Peck SC. Quantitative proteomics in plants: choices in abundance. Plant Cell 2007;19:3339-46. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.05399110.1105/tpc.107.053991217489618055608]Search in Google Scholar
[129. Patterson J, Ford K, Cassin A, Natera S, Bacic A. Increased abundance of proteins involved in phytosiderophore production in boron-tolerant barley. Plant Physiol 2007;144:1612-31. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.09638810.1104/pp.107.096388191412717478636]Search in Google Scholar
[130. Schneider T, Schellenberg M, Meyer S, Keller F, Gehrig P, Riedel K, Lee Y, Eberl L, Martinoia E. Quantitative detection of changes in the leaf-mesophyll tonoplast proteome in dependency of a cadmium exposure of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) plants. Proteomics 2009;9:2668-77. doi: 10.1002/ pmic.20080080610.1002/pmic.20080080619391183]Search in Google Scholar
[131. Finka A, Goloubinoff P. Proteomic data from human cell cultures refine mechanisms of chaperone-mediated protein homeostasis. Cell Stress Chaperones 2013;18:591-605. doi: 10.1007/s12192-013-0413-310.1007/s12192-013-0413-3374526023430704]Search in Google Scholar
[132. Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci 2004;9:244-52. doi: 10.1007/s12192-013-0413-310.1007/s12192-013-0413-3]Search in Google Scholar
[133. Verbruggen N, Hermans C, Schat H. Mechanisms to cope with arsenic or cadmium excess in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2009;12:364-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.00110.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.00119501016]Search in Google Scholar
[134. Remmerie N, De Vijlder, T, Laukens K, Dang TH., Lemiere F, Mertens I. Next generation functional proteomics in nonmodel plants: a survey on techniques and applications for the analysis of protein complexes and post-translational modifications. Phytochemistry 2011;72:1192-218. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.00310.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.00321345472]Search in Google Scholar
[135. Champagne A, Boutry M. Proteomics of nonmodel plant species. Proteomics 2013;13:663-73. doi: 10.1002/ pmic.20120031210.1002/pmic.20120031223125178]Search in Google Scholar
[136. Vanderschuren H, Lentz E, Zainuddin I, Gruissem W.Proteomics of model and crop plant species: Status, current limitations and strategic advances for crop improvement. J Prot 2013;93:5-19 doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.05.03610.1016/j.jprot.2013.05.03623748024]Search in Google Scholar
[137. Galperin MY, Koonin E V. From complete genome sequence to ‘complete’ understanding? Trends Biotechnol 2010;28:398-406. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.05.00610.1016/j.tibtech.2010.05.006306583120647113]Search in Google Scholar
[138. Eapen S, D’Souza SF. Prospects of genetic engineering of plants for phytoremediation of toxic metals. Biotechnol Adv 2005;23:97-114. PMID: 1569412210.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.10.00115694122]Search in Google Scholar
[139. Aken BV. Transgenic plants for phytoremediation: helping nature to clean up environmental pollution. Trends Biotechnol 2008;26:225-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.02.001 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.02.00118353473]Search in Google Scholar