[adams, j. (2015). Glee’s McKinley High: Following Middle America’s Sexual Taboos. Network Science 3, 2: 293-295.]Search in Google Scholar
[adams, j., Moody, J., and Morris, M. (2013). Sex, Drugs, and Race: How Behaviors Differentially Contribute to Sexually Transmitted Infection Risk Network Structure. American Journal of Public Health 103, 2: 322-329.]Search in Google Scholar
[adams, j., Moody, J., Muth, S. Q., and Morris, M. (2012). Quantifying the Benefits of Link-Tracing Designs for Partnership Network Studies. Field Methods 24, 2: 175-193.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barabasi, A.-L. (2009). Scale-Free Networks: A Decade and Beyond. Science 325: 412-413.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bender-deMoll, S. (2013). ndtv: Network Dynamic Temporal Visualization Package.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bojanowski, M. and Corten, R. (2014). Measuring Segregation in Social Networks. Social Networks 39: 14-32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology 92: 1170-1182.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonacich, P. and Lloyd, P. (2001). Eigenvector-like Measures of Centrality for Asymmetric Relations. Social Networks 23, 3: 191-201.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgatti, S. P. and Everett, M. G. (1992). Notions of Position in Social Network Analysis. Sociological Methodology 22: 1-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgatti, S. P. and Everett, M. G. (1997). Network Analysis of 2-Mode Data. Social Networks 19: 243-269.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgatti, S. P. and Everett, M. G. (2006). A Graph-Theoretic Perspective on Centrality. Social Networks 28: 466-484.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., and Shirey, P. R. (1990). LS Sets, Lambda Sets, and Other Cohesive Subsets. Social Networks 12: 337-357.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brin, S. and Page, L. (1998). The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. In Proceedings of the 7th World-Wide Web Conference. Brisbane, Australia.10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., and Rosen, H. (1975). The Development of Writing Abilities. MacMillan Education, London, England.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital. Pp. 31-56 in Social Capital: Theory and Research. Aldine de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Butts, C. T. (2008). A Relational Event Framework for Social Action. Sociological Methodology 38, 1: 155-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cartwright, D. and Harary, F. (1956). Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider’s Theory. Psychological Review 63: 277-293.]Search in Google Scholar
[Centola, D. (2010). The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment. Science 329, 5996: 1194-1197.]Search in Google Scholar
[Collett, J. L., Kelly, S., and Sobolewski, C. (2010). Using Remember the Titans to Teach Theories of Conflict Reduction. Teaching Sociology 38, 3: 258-266.]Search in Google Scholar
[Darrow, W. W., Potterat, J. J., Rothenberg, R. B., Woodhouse, D. E., Muth, S. Q., and Klovdahl, A. S. (1999). Using Knowledge of Social Networks to Prevent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections: The Colorado Springs Study. Sociological Focus 32: 143-158.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eagle, N., Pentland, A. S., and Lazer, D. (2009). Inferring Friendship Network Structure by Using Mobile Phone Data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 106, 36: 15274-15278.]Search in Google Scholar
[Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Balance. Row, Peterson and Co., Evanston, IL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fortunato, S. (2010). Community Detection in Graphs. Physics Reports 486: 75-174.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks 1: 215-239.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, L. C. (1992). The Sociological Concept of Group: An Empirical-Test of 2 Models. American Journal of Sociology 98, 1: 152-166.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, L. C. (2000). See You in the Funny Papers: Cartoons and Social Networks. Connections 23, 1: 32-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, L. C. (2004). The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science. Empirical Press, Vancouver, BC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Golding, W. (1954). Lord of the Flies. Perigree Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 6: 1360-1380.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and Uses Among Members of the ‘Net Generation. Sociological Inquiry 80, 1: 92-113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holland, P. W. and Leinhardt, S. (1970). A Method for Detecting Structure in Sociometric Data. American Journal of Sociology 70: 492-513.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hummon, N. P. and Doreian, P. (2003). Some Dynamics of Social Balance Processes: Bringing Heider Back into Balance Theory. Social Networks 25: 17-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knoke, D. and Yang, S. (2007). Social Network Analysis, Volume 154 of Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kossinets, G. and Watts, D. J. (2006). Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network. Science 311, 5757: 88—90.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., and Prensky, D. (1994). The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis. In Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, edited by L.C. Freeman, D.R. White, and A.K. Romney. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden, P. V. (2011). Survey Methods for Network Data. Chapter 5 in The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by John Scott and Peter J. Carrington. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415-444.]Search in Google Scholar
[Milgram, S. (1967). The Small World Problem. Psychology Today 1:61-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moody, J. (1998). Matrix Methods for Calculating the Triad Census. Social Networks 20, 4: 291-299.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moody, J. (2009). Network Dynamics. Chapter 19 in The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by John Scott and Peter J. Carrington. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moody, J. and White, D. R. (2003). Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups. American Sociological Review 68, 1: 103-127.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morris, M. (2004). Network Epidemiology: A Handbook for Survey Design and Data Collection. Oxford University Press, London.10.1093/0199269017.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Mouw, T. and Verdery, A. M. (2012). Network Sampling with Memory: A Proposal for More Efficient Sampling from Social Networks. Sociological Methodology 42, 1: 206-256.]Search in Google Scholar
[Neal, Z. (2014). The Backbone of Bipartite Projections: Inferring Relationships from Co-authorship, Co-sponsorship, Co-attendance and other Co-behaviors. Social Networks 39: 84-97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter, M. A., Onnela, J.-P., and Mucha, P. J. (2009). Communities in Networks. Notices of the AMS 56, 9: 1082-1097, 1164-1166.]Search in Google Scholar
[R, Development Core Team. (2006). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salganik, M. J. and Heckathorn, D. D. (2004). Sampling and Estimation in Hhidden Populations Using Respondent Driven Sampling. Sociological Methodology 34: 193-240.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaefer, D., Light, J. M., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., and Martin, C. L. (2010). Fundamental Principles of Network Formation among Preschool Children. Social Networks 32: 61-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaefer, D. R., Kornienko, O., and Fox, A. M. (2011). Misery Does Not Love Company: Network Selection Mechanisms and Depression Homophily. American Sociological Review 75, 5: 764-785.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, J. and Carrington, P. J. (2011). The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis. Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A. B., and Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence. Sociological Methodology 40, 1: 329-393.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Volume 8 of Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511815478]Search in Google Scholar
[Wellman, B. (1988). Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance. Pp. 19-61 in Social Structures: A Network Approach. Volume 2 of Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Barry Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz. Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., and Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet Increase, Decrease or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment. American Behavioral Scientist 45: 436-455.]Search in Google Scholar
[White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., and Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social Structure from Multiple Networks 1: Blockmodels of Roles and Positions. American Journal of Sociology 81: 730-780.]Search in Google Scholar
