[Agresti, A. 2002. “Categorical Data Analysis.” Wiley Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.10.1002/0471249688]Search in Google Scholar
[Ainsworth, J.W. and V.J. Roscigno. 2005. “Stratification, school-work linkages and vocational education.” Social Forces 84: 257-284.10.1353/sof.2005.0087]Search in Google Scholar
[Bailey, S. and P.V. Marsden. 1999. “Interpretation and interview context: examining the general social survey name generator using cognitive methods.” Social Networks 21: 287-309.10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00013-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Beattie, I.R. 2002. “Are all ‘adolescent econometricians’ created equal? Racial, class, and gender differences in college enrollment.” Sociology of Education 75: 19-43.10.2307/3090252]Search in Google Scholar
[Blau, P.M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. The Free Press, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blau, P.M. and J.E. Schwartz. 1984. Cross-Cutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrosociological Theory of Intergroup Relations. Academic Press, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brashears, M.E. 2008. “Gender and homophily: Differences in male and female association in Blau space.” Social Science Research 37: 400-415.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Brashears, M.E. 2011. “Small networks and high isolation? A reexamination of American discussion networks.” Social Networks 33: 331-341.10.1016/j.socnet.2011.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Brashears, Matthew E. 2014. “‘Trivial’ topics and rich ties: The relationship between discussion topic, alter role, and resource availability using the ‘Important Matters’ name generator.” Sociological Science 1:493-511. DOI 10.15195/v1.a2710.15195/v1.a27]Search in Google Scholar
[Buchmann, C., T.A. DiPrete and A. McDaniel. 2006. “Gender inequalities in education.” Annual Review of Sociology 34: 319-337.10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134719]Search in Google Scholar
[Burt, R.S. 1991. “Measuring age as a structural concept.” Social Networks 13: 1-34.10.1016/0378-8733(91)90011-H]Search in Google Scholar
[Carlson, Susan M. 1992. “Trends in race/sex occupational inequality: Conceptual and measurement issues.” Social Problems 39: 268-290.10.2307/3096962]Search in Google Scholar
[Charles, M. 2003. “Deciphering sex segregation: vertical and horizontal inequalities in ten national labor markets.” Acta Sociologica 46: 267-287.10.1177/0001699303464001]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, P.N. 2004. “The gender division of labor: ‘keeping house’ and occupational segregation in the United States.” Gender and Society 18: 239-252.10.1177/0891243203262037]Search in Google Scholar
[Correll, S.J. 2001. “Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments.” The American Journal of Sociology 106: 1691-1730.10.1086/321299]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, J.A., T.W. Smith, P.V. Marsden, J. Kim, S. Kim, A. Lynch, J. Son, C. Gershenson, J. Hemley, K. Dhadialla and M. Bretschneider. 2008. General Social Surveys 1972-2006: Cumulative Codebook. National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL.10.3886/ICPSR04697]Search in Google Scholar
[Feld, S.L. 1981. “The focused organization of social ties.” The American Journal of Sociology 86: 1015-1035.10.1086/227352]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, C. 2009. “The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact?” American Sociological Review 74: 657-669.10.1177/000312240907400408]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodman, L.A. 1979. “Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 537-552.10.1080/01621459.1979.10481650]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodman, L.A. 1985. “The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for contingency tables with or without missing entries.” Annals of Statistics 13: 10-69.10.1214/aos/1176346576]Search in Google Scholar
[Granovetter, M. 1973. “The strength of weak ties.” The American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360-1380.10.1086/225469]Search in Google Scholar
[Hampton, K.N. and B. Wellman. 2003. “Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb.” City & Community 2: 277-311.10.1046/j.1535-6841.2003.00057.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hampton, K.N., L. F. Sessions, and E.J. Her. 2010. “Core networks, social isolation, and new media: Internet and mobile phone use, network size, and diversity.” Information, Communication & Society 14: 130-155.10.1080/1369118X.2010.513417]Search in Google Scholar
[Holt, D.A.J. Scott and P.D. Ewings. 1980. “Chi-square tests with survey data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 143: 302-320.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huffman, M.L. and P.N. Cohen. 2004. “Occupational segregation and the gender gap in workplace authority: National versus local labor markets.” Sociological Forum 19: 121-147.10.1023/B:SOFO.0000019650.97510.de]Search in Google Scholar
[Ibarra, H. 1992. “Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 422-447.10.2307/2393451]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacobs, J.A. 1996. “Gender inequality and higher education.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 153-185.10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.153]Search in Google Scholar
[Kish, L. 1965. Survey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lazarsfeld, P. & R. Merton. 1954. “Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis.” In Freedom and Control in Modern Society. Morroe Berger ed. Van Nostrand, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mandel, H. and M Semyonov. 2005. “Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: Sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries.” American Sociological Review 70: 949-967.10.1177/000312240507000604]Search in Google Scholar
[Marin, A. 2004. “Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics? Implications for name generator data.” Social Networks 26: 289-307.10.1016/j.socnet.2004.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden, P.V. 1988. “Homogeneity in confiding relations.” Social Networks 10: 57-76.10.1016/0378-8733(88)90010-X]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson, M. 2004. “A Blau space primer: Prolegomenon to an ecology of affiliation.” Industrial and Corporate Change 13: 263-280.10.1093/icc/13.1.263]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson, J.M. and L. Smith-Lovin. 1982. “Women and weak ties: Differences by sex in the size of voluntary organizations.” The American Journal of Sociology 87: 883-904.10.1086/227525]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson, J.M. and L. Smith-Lovin. 1986. “Sex segregation in voluntary associations.” American Sociological Review 51: 61-79.10.2307/2095478]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson, J.M, L. Smith-Lovin, & J. Cook. 2001. “Birds of a feather: Homophily and social networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415-444.10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin and M.E. Brashears. 2006. “Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades.” American Sociological Review 71: 353-375.10.1177/000312240607100301]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin and M.E. Brashears. 2008. “Erratum: Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades.” American Sociological Review 73: 1022.10.1177/000312240807300610]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin and M.E. Brashears. 2009. “Models and marginals: Using survey evidence to study social networks.” American Sociological Review 74: 670-681.10.1177/000312240907400409]Search in Google Scholar
[Mickelson, R.A. 2003. “Gender, Bourdieu, and the anomaly of women’s achievement redux.” Sociology of Education 76: 373-375.10.2307/1519873]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, G. 1990. “Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks.” American Sociological Review 55: 726-735.10.2307/2095868]Search in Google Scholar
[Paik, Anthony and Kenneth Sanchagrin. 2013. “Social isolation in America: An artifact.” American Sociological Review 78: 339-360.10.1177/0003122413482919]Search in Google Scholar
[Popielarz, Pamela A. 1999. “(In) voluntary association: A multilevel analysis of gender segregation in voluntary organizations.” Gender and Society 13: 234-250.10.1177/089124399013002005]Search in Google Scholar
[Powers, D.A. and Y. Xie. 2000. Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.10.1016/B978-012563736-7/50005-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Rainie, L., J. Horrigan, B. Wellman and J. Boase. 2006. “The strength of Internet ties.” Pew Internet and American Life Project, January 25, 2006, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/The-Strength-of-Internet-Ties.aspx, accessed on March 16, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reskin, B. 1993. “Sex segregation in the workplace.” Annual Review of Sociology 19: 241-270.10.1146/annurev.so.19.080193.001325]Search in Google Scholar
[Roth, L.M. 2004. “Engendering inequality: Processes of sex-segregation on Wall Street.” Sociological Forum 19: 203-228.10.1023/B:SOFO.0000031980.82004.d7]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruan, D. 1998. “The content of the general social survey discussion networks: An exploration of the general social survey discussion name generator in a Chinese context.” Social Networks 20: 247-264.10.1016/S0378-8733(98)00004-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Schlottman, A.M. and H.W. Herzog, Jr. 1984. “Career and geographic mobility interactions: Implications for the age selectivity of migration.” The Journal of Human Resources 19: 72-86.10.2307/145417]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, J., M. McPherson and L. Smith-Lovin. 2014. “Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985 to 2004.” American Sociological Review 79: 432-456.10.1177/0003122414531776]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith-Lovin, L. and M. McPherson. 1993. “You are who you know: A network approach to gender.” in Theory on Gender, Feminism on Theory. Paula England ed. Aldine de Gruyther, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tufekci, Zeynep and Matthew E. Brashears. 2014. “Are we all equally at home socializing online? Cyberasociality and evidence for an unequal distribution of disdain for digitally-mediated sociality.” Information, Communication and Society 17: 486-502.10.1080/1369118X.2014.891634]Search in Google Scholar
[Van der Ploeg, S. 1994. “Educational expansion and returns on credentials.” European Sociological Review 10: 63-78.10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036316]Search in Google Scholar
[Xie, Y. 1992. “The log-multiplicative layer effect model for comparing mobility tables.” American Sociological Review 57: 380-395.10.2307/2096242]Search in Google Scholar