Accesso libero

On the molecular identity of Paratylenchus nanus Cobb, 1923 (Nematoda: Tylenchida)

Sergei A. Subbotin
Sergei A. Subbotin
, 
Guiping Yan
Guiping Yan
, 
Mihail Kantor
Mihail Kantor
 e 
Zafar Handoo
Zafar Handoo
   | 11 gen 2021
Journal of Nematology's Cover Image
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Cita
Pubblicato online: 11 gen 2021
Pagine: 1 - 7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2020-127
Parole chiave
© 2021 Sergei A. Subbotin et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Figure 1:

Anterior regions of Paratylenchus. A, B: P. projectus from samples collected in Devils Lake, Ramsey County, North Dakota; C-F: P. nanus from samples collected in Four Mile Run, Fall Church, Virginia. Scale – 10 µm.
Anterior regions of Paratylenchus. A, B: P. projectus from samples collected in Devils Lake, Ramsey County, North Dakota; C-F: P. nanus from samples collected in Four Mile Run, Fall Church, Virginia. Scale – 10 µm.

Figure 2:

Posterior regions of Paratylenchus. A: P. projectus from samples collected in Devils Lake, Ramsey County, North Dakota; B-F: P. nanus from samples collected in Four Mile Run, Fall Church, Virginia. Scale – 10 µm.
Posterior regions of Paratylenchus. A: P. projectus from samples collected in Devils Lake, Ramsey County, North Dakota; B-F: P. nanus from samples collected in Four Mile Run, Fall Church, Virginia. Scale – 10 µm.

Figure 3:

Phylogenetic relationships of Paratylenchus nanus with other related species. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree from two runs as inferred from analysis of the D2-D3 of 28 S rRNA gene sequence alignment under the GTR + I + G model. Posterior probabilities equal or more than 70% are given for appropriate clades. New sequences are indicated in bold. * – originally identified as P. nanus. 
Phylogenetic relationships of Paratylenchus nanus with other related species. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree from two runs as inferred from analysis of the D2-D3 of 28 S rRNA gene sequence alignment under the GTR + I + G model. Posterior probabilities equal or more than 70% are given for appropriate clades. New sequences are indicated in bold. * – originally identified as P. nanus. 

Figure 4:

Phylogenetic relationships of Paratylenchus nanus with other related species: Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree from two runs as inferred from analysis of the ITS rRNA gene sequence alignment under the GTR + I + G model. Posterior probabilities equal or more than 70% are given for appropriate clades. New sequences are indicated in bold. * – originally identified as P. nanus.
Phylogenetic relationships of Paratylenchus nanus with other related species: Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree from two runs as inferred from analysis of the ITS rRNA gene sequence alignment under the GTR + I + G model. Posterior probabilities equal or more than 70% are given for appropriate clades. New sequences are indicated in bold. * – originally identified as P. nanus.

Figure 5:

Phylogenetic relationships of Paratylenchus nanus with other related species: Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree from two runs as inferred from analysis of the COI gene sequence alignment under the GTR + I + G model. Posterior probabilities equal or more than 70% are given for appropriate clades. New sequences are indicated in bold. * – originally identified as P. nanus, ** − originally identified as Pratylenchus sp.
Phylogenetic relationships of Paratylenchus nanus with other related species: Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree from two runs as inferred from analysis of the COI gene sequence alignment under the GTR + I + G model. Posterior probabilities equal or more than 70% are given for appropriate clades. New sequences are indicated in bold. * – originally identified as P. nanus, ** − originally identified as Pratylenchus sp.
eISSN:
2640-396X
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
Volume Open
Argomenti della rivista:
Life Sciences, other
Feed RSS della rivista