[
Atkin, D. J. (1994). The natural flow of learning. Conditions which enhance and maximise learning. Harden-Murrumburrah: Bumgum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Davies, F., & Barrett, L. (2015). Clever classrooms. Manchester: University of Salford. Retrieved from www.salford.ac.uk/CleverClassrooms
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (2008). Reframing organisations - Artistry, choice, and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching: A New Zealand perspective. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bray, B., & McClaskey, K. (2013). A step-by-step guide to personalize learning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 40(7), 12-19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burkhardt, G., Monsour, M., Valdez, G., Gunn, C., Dawson, M., Lemke, C., Coughlin, E., Thadani, V, & Martin, C. (2003). enGauge® 21st Century skills: Literacy in the digital age. Naperville and Los Angeles, CA: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL) and the Metiri Group.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Busher, H. (2006). Understanding educational leadership: People, power and culture. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carneiro, R., Lefrere, P., Steffens, K., & Underwood, J. (2011). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments. A European perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-654-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cavanagh, S. (2014). ‘Personalized learning’ eludes easy definitions. Education Week, 34(9), 2-4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clarke, J. (2013). Personalized learning: Student-designed pathways to high school graduation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, SAGE Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cuban, L. (2004). The open classroom. Education Next, 4(2), 69-71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Department of Education. (1977). Report on open plan education in New Zealand primary schools. Wellington: Department of Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture 19(1), 43-63.10.1080/13602365.2014.882376
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frederick, L. D., & Hummel, J. H. (2014). Reviewing the outcomes and principles of effective instruction. In D. J. Moran, & R. W. Malott, (Eds.) Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 9-22). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203165805
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grant, P., & Basye, D. (2014). Personalized learning: A guide for engaging students with technology. Oregon, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hipkins, R. (2014). Different ways of thinking about learning. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research, Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/research/publications/ different-ways-thinking-about-learning
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leadbeater, C. (2006). The future of public services: Personalised learning. In Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Personalising education (pp. 101-114). Paris: OECD.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maharey, S. (2006, April 27). Personalising learning the way forward. Retrieved from beehive.govt.nz: https://www beehive.govt.nz/release/personalising-learning-way-forward
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning theory and practice. Wakefield: CAST Professional Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Education. (2006, 27 November). Lets talk about personalised learning. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Education. (2015). The Ministry of Education four year plan 2015-2019. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Ministry/Publications/MOE-Four-Year-Plan-2015-2019.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Education. (2016a, October 1). The local context: Educational vision and teaching and learning approaches. Retrieved from ILE: http://ile.education.govt.nz/the-local-context
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry ofEducation. (2016b, September 18). Innovative learning environments. Retrieved from enabling e-learning: http://elearning.tki.org.nz/Teaching/Innovative-learning-environments
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Education. (2016c). Ambitious for New Zealand. The Ministry ofEducation Four Year Plan 2016-2020. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/4-Year-Plan-2016-WEB.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mitchell, D. (2010). Universal design for learning. In Ministry of Education, Education that fits: Review of international trends in the education of students with special educational needs. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Organisation for Economic and Co-operative Development (OECD). (2013). Innovative learning environments. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Organisation for Economic and Co-operative Development (OECD). (2015). Schooling redesigned: Towards innovative learning systems. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tolmie, E. (2016). Implementing personalised learning in New Zealand primary schools innovative learning environments. Unpublished Master of Educational Leadership and Management thesis. Auckland: Unitec Institute of Technology.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toshalis, E., & Nakkula, M. (2012). Motivation, engagement, and student voice. Boston, MA: Jobs for the future. Retrieved from http://www.studentsatthecenter.org/topics/motivation-engagement-and-student-voice
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Underwood, J., & Banyard, P. (2008). Managers’, teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of personalised learning: Evidence from Impact 2007. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(3), 233-246.10.1080/14759390802383850
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wellington, J. (2015). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781474236966
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woolner, P., McCarter, S., Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2012). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice? Improving Schools, 15(1), 45-60.10.1177/1365480211434796
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zimmerman, B. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional model. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regualated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). New York, NY: Guilford.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zmuda, A., Ullman, D., & Curtis, G. (2015). Learning personalized: The evolution of the contemporary classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
]Search in Google Scholar
