Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems
Volume 12 (2019): Numero 1 (January 2019)
Accesso libero
Employment of PSO algorithm to improve the neural network technique for radial distribution system state estimation
Husham Idan Hussein
Husham Idan Hussein
,
Ghassan Abdullah Salman
Ghassan Abdullah Salman
e
Ahmed Majeed Ghadban
Ahmed Majeed Ghadban
| 05 set 2019
International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems
Volume 12 (2019): Numero 1 (January 2019)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Article Category:
research-article
Pubblicato online:
05 set 2019
Pagine:
1 - 10
Ricevuto:
17 gen 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2019-005
Parole chiave
RDPS
,
RDPS
,
PSO
,
Neural network
,
Hybrid algorithm
,
State estimation
,
Monitoring system
,
Optimization methods
,
PMU
© 2019 Husham Idan Hussein et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1:
General scheme of state estimation (Husham and Ahmed, 2018).
Figure 2:
Flow chart for the placement of PMUs for network observability.
Figure 3:
Reactive power compensation principle (Husham and Ahmed, 2018).
Figure 4:
Voltage bus magnitude (actual, estimated PMU, estimated PSO–NN) of IEEE 9-bus RDS.
Figure 5:
Voltage bus angle (actual, estimated PMU, estimated PSO–NN) of IEEE 9-bus RDS.
Figure 6:
Regression plots of IEEE 9 bus: (A) bus voltage magnitudes; and (B) angle bus voltage values.
Figure 7:
Voltage bus magnitude (actual, estimated PMU, estimated PSO–NN) of IEEE 33-bus RDS.
Figure 8:
Voltage bus angle (actual, estimated PMU, estimated PSO–NN) of IEEE 33-bus RDS.
Figure 9:
Regression plots of IEEE 34 bus: (A) bus voltage magnitudes; and (B) angle bus voltage values.
Figure 10:
Voltage bus magnitude (actual, estimated PMU, estimated PSO–NN) of IEEE 69-bus RDS.
Figure 11:
Voltage bus angle (actual, estimated PMU, estimated PSO–NN) of IEEE 69-bus RDS.
Figure 12:
Regression plots of IEEE 69-bus: (A) bus voltage magnitudes; and (B) angle bus voltage values.
MSE for voltage magnitudes and angle values in each test.
VB
δ
Test
MSE
MSE
IEEE 9
6e−08
4e−07
IEEE 33
2.5e−07
4e−07
IEEE 69
1.43e−10
5.5e−09