Evaluation of the mandibular arch in patients with impacted permanent lower canines

1. Joshi MR. Transmigrant mandibular canines: a record of 28 cases and a retrospective review of the literature. Angle Orthod 2001;71:12-22.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bluestone LI. The impacted mandibular bicuspid and canine: indications for removal and surgical considerations. Dent Items Interest 1951;73:341-55.Search in Google Scholar

3. Qaradaghi IF. Bilateral transmigration of impacted mandibular canines: report of two cases and review. Rev Clín Pesq Odontol 2010;6:271-5.Search in Google Scholar

4. Taguchi Y, Kurol J, Kobayashi H, Noda T. Eruption disturbances of mandibular permanent canines in Japanese children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001;11:98-102.10.1046/j.1365-263x.2001.00250.xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Jain S, Shetty KS, Prakash AT, Agrawal M, Jain S. Permanent mandibular canine(s) impaction: expansion of our understanding. Aust Orthod J 2014;30:39-44.Search in Google Scholar

6. McConnell TL, Hoffman DL, Forbes DP, Janzen EK, Weintraub NH. Maxillary canine impaction in patients with transverse maxillary deficiency. ASDC J Dent Child 1996;63:190-5.Search in Google Scholar

7. Becker, A. General principles related to the diagnosis and treatment of impacted teeth. In: The orthodontic treatment of impacted teeth. 2nd edn. London: Martin Dunitz, 2007;1-11.Search in Google Scholar

8. Wedl JS, Danias S, Schmelzle R, Friedrich RE. Eruption times of permanent teeth in children and young adolescents in Athens (Greece). Clin Oral Investig 2005; 9:131-4.10.1007/s00784-004-0295-ySearch in Google Scholar

9. Rakosi T, Jonas I, Graber TM. Study cast analysis. In: Colour atlas of dental medicine: orthodontic diagnosis. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc., 1993;214.Search in Google Scholar

10. Proffit WR. Early stages of development. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 2007;72-106.Search in Google Scholar

11. Nelson SJ, Ash M Jr. Introduction to dental anatomy. In: Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology, and occlusion. 9th edn. Missouri: Elsevier, 2010;1-19.Search in Google Scholar

12. Proffit WR, Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Orthodontic diagnosis: The development of a problem list. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 2007;167-233.Search in Google Scholar

13. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1940;122-32.Search in Google Scholar

14. Nelson SJ, Ash M Jr. The permanent canines: maxillary and mandibular. In: Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology, and occlusion. 9th edn. Missouri: Elsevier, 2010;125-39.Search in Google Scholar

15. Moyers RE, Burdi AR. Development of the dentition and occlusion. In: Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. 4th edn. Chicago: Mosby, 1988;99-146.Search in Google Scholar

16. Peck S. Dental anomaly patterns (DAP). A new way to look at malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2009;79:1015-6.Search in Google Scholar

17. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Prevalence of tooth agenesis and peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisor associated with palatally displaced canine (PDC) anomaly. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:441-3.10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70048-3Search in Google Scholar

18. Pirinen S, Arte S, Apajalahti S. Palatal displacement of canine is genetic and related to congenital absence of teeth. J Dent Res 1996;75:1742-6.10.1177/002203459607501006018955668Search in Google Scholar