INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Figure 1.

Development of the Pruitt-Igoe housing estate, author’s own drawing [13]
Development of the Pruitt-Igoe housing estate, author’s own drawing [13]

Figure 2.

Layout of PlantIT, author’s own drawing [18]
Layout of PlantIT, author’s own drawing [18]

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteri Pruitt-Igoe PlantIT
First group + +
Second group + -
Third group - +
Fourth group - -

Second group

Uniformity of urban development Uniform shape of buildings, standardization of housing areas

Third group

Mixed functionality and diversity Mixing the functions of stores, offices, individual apartments in one place
Mixed functionalities using the neighborhood within the block and inside the building
Mixing people at different ages, income levels, cultures and races
Diversity of apartments Various size of apartments
High quality architecture Emphasis on beauty, aesthetics, comfort of the urban environment, creating a “sense of place”
Rooting of the sense of public spaces in the community
Urban design The human scale of architecture and a beautiful environment that supports the humanist spirit
Traditional neighborhood structure Clear distinction between the center and the peripheries with a clear indication of this
Creation of public spaces in the center
High quality public spaces
Main destinations used on a daily basis within a ten-minute walk
The largest density of development in the city center gradually becoming less dense on the outskirts
Sustainable development Minimal impact of buildings on the environment and its maximum use
Eco-friendly technologies, respect for the environment and awareness of the value of natural systems
Energy efficiency
Limiting the use of non-renewable energy sources
Increase of local production
More emphasis on walking, limitation of driving
Digitization of the connection network Flow of information on energy consumption, access control, movement, work, leisure and entertainment

First group

Accessibility by foot Facilities located 10 minutes of walking distance from home and work
Buildings located close to a thoroughfare with windows facing the street
Parking places on the street or in underground car parks
Narrow streets designed for vehicular traffic with a low speed
Areas for pedestrian and motor traffic
Network of links through communication paths Network of interlinked streets providing redistribution of traffic and promoting walking routes
Hierarchical streets: narrow streets, boulevards, avenues
network of pedestrian connections and public spaces ensuring the attractiveness of walking through them
Increased density Buildings, shops and service facilities located in the close vicinity
More efficient use of resources and services
Green transport High-quality transport network used to connect cities, towns and settlements
Pedestrian-friendly design of cities, providing extensive use of bicycles, rollers, scooters and walking tours promoting everyday traffic
Quality of life Access to running water, sewage, light, recreation and green areas inside and around the housing estate

Fourth group

Social segregation Racial segregation, material segregation
High-scale of objects Buildings with several floors
Accumulation of population Common spaces inside buildings
Deficiency in availability of sufficient communication Insufficient number of parking spaces
Dry ambient environment Lack of diversity in local environment
eISSN:
1899-0142
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Architecture and Design, Architecture, Architects, Buildings