This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Chieze M, Hurst S, Kaiser S, Sentissi O. Effects of seclusion and restraint in adult psychiatry: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry 2019;10:491.Search in Google Scholar
Doedens P, Vermeulen J, Boyette LL, Latour C, de Haan L. Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services – a systematic review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2020;27(4):446-59.Search in Google Scholar
Cornaggia CM, Beghi M, Pavone F, Barale F. Aggression in psychiatry wards: a systematic review. Psychiatry Res 2011;189(1):10-20.Search in Google Scholar
Weltens I, Bak M, Verhagen S, Vandenberk E, Domen P, van Amelsvoort T, et al. Aggression on the psychiatric ward: prevalence and risk factors. A systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 2021;16(10):e0258346.Search in Google Scholar
Van Der Merwe M, Muir-Cochrane E, Jones J, Tziggili M, Bowers L. Improving seclusion practice: implications of a review of staff and patient views. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2013;20(3):203-15.Search in Google Scholar
Raboch J, Kalisová L, Nawka A, Kitzlerová E, Onchev G, Karastergiou A, et al. Use of coercive measures during involuntary hospitalization: findings from ten European countries. Psychiatr Serv 2010;61(10):1012-7.Search in Google Scholar
Ustawa z dnia 19 sierpnia 1994 r. o ochronie zdrowia psychicznego. Dz. U. z 2020 r. poz. 685 ze zm.Search in Google Scholar
Flaga-Gieruszyńska K, Radlińska I, editors. Przymus bezpośredni stosowany wobec osób z zaburzeniami psychicznymi. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Pomorskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Szczecinie; 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Amos PA. New considerations in the prevention of aversives, restraint, and seclusion: incorporating the role of relationships into an ecological perspective. Res Pract Pers Sev Disabil 2004;29(4):263-72.Search in Google Scholar
Curran MB, editor. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Behavioral Health Care (CAMBHC). 3rd ed. Oakbrook Terrace. Illinois: Joint Commission Resources; 2022. p. 990.Search in Google Scholar
United States General Accounting Office (USGAO). Mental health: extent of risk from improper restraint or seclusion is unknown. GAO/HES-99. Washington DC: States General Accounting Office; 1999. p. 1-16.Search in Google Scholar
Care Quality Commission. Out of sight – who cares? Newcastel: Care Quality Commission; 2020. p. 1-74.Search in Google Scholar
Giacco D, Conneely M, Masoud T, Burn E, Priebe S. Interventions for involuntary psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review. Eur Psychiatry 2018;54:41-50.Search in Google Scholar
Gutheil TG. Observations on the theoretical bases for seclusion of the psychiatric inpatient. Am J Psychiatry 1978;135(3):325-8.Search in Google Scholar
Beghi M, Peroni F, Gabola P, Rossetti A, Cornaggia CM. Prevalence and risk factors for the use of restraint in psychiatry: A systematic review. Riv Psichiatr 2013;48(1):10-22.Search in Google Scholar
Benjaminsen S, Gøtzsche-Larsen K, Norrie B, Harder L, Luxhøi A. Patient violence in a psychiatric hospital in Denmark: rate of violence and relation to diagnosis. Nord J Psychiatry 1996;50(3):233-42.Search in Google Scholar
Huckshorn KA. Re-designing state mental health policy to prevent the use of seclusion and restraint. Adm Policy Ment Health 2006;33(4):482-91.Search in Google Scholar
Happell B, Harrow A. Nurses’ attitudes to the use of seclusion: a review of the literature. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2010;19(3):162-8.Search in Google Scholar
Riahi S, Thomson G, Duxbury J. An integrative review exploring decision-making factors influencing mental health nurses in the use of restraint. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2016;23(2):116-28.Search in Google Scholar
Laukkanen E, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Louheranta O, Kuosmanen L. Psychiatric nursing staffs’ attitudes towards the use of containment methods in psychiatric inpatient care: an integrative review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2019;28(2):390-406.Search in Google Scholar
Krieger E, Moritz S, Weil R, Nagel M. Patients’ attitudes towards and acceptance of coercion in psychiatry. Psychiatry Res 2018;260:478-85.Search in Google Scholar
Gowda GS, Lepping P, Noorthoorn EO, Ali SF, Kumar CN, Raveesh BN, et al. Restraint prevalence and perceived coercion among psychiatric inpatients from South India: a prospective study. Asian J Psychiatr 2018;36:10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.05.024.Search in Google Scholar
Dressing H, Salize HJ. Compulsory admission of mentally ill patients in European Union Member States. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004;39(10):797-803.Search in Google Scholar
United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html (12.01.2023).Search in Google Scholar
Kelly BD. An end to psychiatric detention? Implications of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Br J Psychiatry 2014;204(3):174-5.Search in Google Scholar
Oostermeijer S, Brasier C, Harvey C, Hamilton B, Roper C, Martel A, et al. Design features that reduce the use of seclusion and restraint in mental health facilities: a rapid systematic review. BMJ Open 2021;11(7):e046647.Search in Google Scholar
Ulrich RS, Bogren L, Gardiner SK, Lundin S. Psychiatric ward design can reduce aggressive behavior. J Environ Psychol 2018;57:53-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.05.002.Search in Google Scholar
Muskett C. Trauma-informed care in inpatient mental health settings: a review of the literature. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2014;23(1):51-9.Search in Google Scholar
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). National Guidelines for Behavioral Health Crisis Care. Best Practice Toolkit. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2020. p. 1-80.Search in Google Scholar
, 