An analysis of the results of genetic paternity tests performed for judicial purposes in the years 2018–2023 at the Chair and Department of Forensic Medicine of the Medical University of Warsaw

1 Karpiewska A, Kowalczyk E, Dobosz T. Paternity testing at the Department of Forensic Medicine of Wroclaw Medical University (Poland). Leg Med (Tokyo) 2017;26:18-24. Search in Google Scholar

2 Gręda A. Dowód z badań DNA w sprawach o ustalenie lub zaprzeczenie pochodzenia dziecka. Palestra 2015;3-4:69-79. Search in Google Scholar

3 Babol-Pokora K, Jacewicz R, Pepinski W, Szram S. Is SGM Plus™ the sufficient system for paternity testing? Int Congr Ser 2006;1288:450-2. Search in Google Scholar

4 Drábek J. Validation of software for calculating the likelihood ratio for parentage and kinship. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2009;3(2):112-8. Search in Google Scholar

5 Egeland T, Kling D, Mostad P. Relationship inference with Familias and R. Statistical method in forensic genetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. Search in Google Scholar

6 Kling D, Mostad PF, Egeland T. Manual for Familias 3. 2017. https://familias.name/Files/manualFamilias.pdf (21.11.2024). Search in Google Scholar

7 Zasady atestacji laboratoriów genetycznych przy Polskim Towarzystwie Medycyny Sądowej i Kryminologii na rok 2016. Polskie Towarzystwo Medycyny Sądowej i Kryminologii. http://www.ptmsik.pl/komisja-genetyki-sadowej/zasady-atestacji-na-rok-2016 (21.11.2024). Search in Google Scholar

8 Relationship Testing. Technical report for testing in 2022. As compared to reported data from 2020 and 2021. Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies. https://www.aabb.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/accreditation/2022-technical-report-summary.pdf?sfvrsn=4ef9c537_1 (21.11.2024). Search in Google Scholar

9 Wójcik MA, Skawrońska M, Niemcunowicz-Janica A, Pepiński W. Analiza wykluczeń ojcostwa w materiale Zakładu Medycyny Sądowej Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Białymstoku w latach 2008–2017. Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol 2018;68(4):281-9. Search in Google Scholar

10 De Kock AA, Kloppers JJ. The impact of motherless paternity testing in a South African population. Afr Health Sci 2021;21(1):379-84. Search in Google Scholar

11 García-Aceves ME, Jasso-Razo DG, Díaz-Navarro X X, Rangel-Villalobos H. A posteriori parameters from paternity tests of a Mexican laboratory with the powerplex fusion system. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2023;64:102296. Search in Google Scholar

12 Thelingwani RS, Jonhera CA, Masimirembwa C. Analysis of data and common mutations encountered during routine parentage testing in Zimbabwe. Sci Rep 2024;14:1385. Search in Google Scholar

13 Plodthong N, Chareonsirisuthigul T, Lumjiaktase P, Rerkamnuaychoke B. Analysis of paternity testing results by Identifiler™ system in Thailand. Thai J Genet 2014;7(2):133-8. Search in Google Scholar

14 Huang YM, Wang J, Jiao Z, Yang L, Zhang X, Tang H, et al. Assessment of application value of 19 autosomal short tandem repeat loci of GoldenEye^TM 20A kit in forensic paternity testing. Int J Legal Med 2013;127(3):587-90. Search in Google Scholar

15 Lee HS, Lee JW, Han GR, Hwang JJ. Motherless case in paternity testing. Forensic Sci Int 2000;114(2):57-65. Search in Google Scholar

16 Zhang MX, Gao HM, Han SY, Liu Y, Tian YL, Sun SH, et al. Risk analysis of duo parentage testing with limited STR loci. Genet Mol Res 2014;13(1):1179-86. Search in Google Scholar

17 Aguiar VRC, de Castro AM, Pinto LM, Ferreira ACS, Dos Santos EVW, Louro ID. Assessing false paternity risk in simulated motherless cases from more than 20 000 real exclusion trios. Transfusion 2021;61(3):678-81. Search in Google Scholar

18 Dogan M, Canturk KM, Emre R, Kara U, Filoglu G. Demonstration of false inclusion risks of duo parentage analyses in the Turkish population in light of parentage acceptance criteria. Aust J Forensic Sci 2017;49(3):326-31. Search in Google Scholar

19 Bonar M, Czosnykowska M, Kowalczyk E, Dobosz T. Pomijanie matki w testach DNA ustalających ojcostwo może prowadzić do błędu. Przypadki Medyczne 2012;18:65-70. Search in Google Scholar