Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Volume 3 (2018): Numero 1 (June 2018)
Accesso libero
The Triaxiality Role in the Spin-Orbit Dynamics of a Rigid Body
A. Cantero
A. Cantero
,
F. Crespo
F. Crespo
e
S. Ferrer
S. Ferrer
| 03 ott 2018
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Volume 3 (2018): Numero 1 (June 2018)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Pubblicato online:
03 ott 2018
Pagine:
187 - 208
Ricevuto:
06 feb 2018
Accettato:
21 mag 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21042/AMNS.2018.1.00015
Parole chiave
Rotational and orbital dynamics
,
gravity-gradient
,
intermediary
,
relative equilibria
© 2018 A. Cantero et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Fig. 1
Geometry of the variables (r, φ, ψ, θ, δ, ν, R, Φ, Ψ, Θ, Δ, N). The variable r and the angles are explicitly given in the figure, while the associated momenta are included implicitly through the inclinations of the planes. The conjugate variable R remains unrepresented because of its pure dynamical sense.
Fig. 2
Columns from left to right we have: (i)ρ = 0, A1 = 9.80 · 1020, A2 = 9.8 · 1020, A3 = 1.07 · 1021. (ii)ρ = 0.0005, A1 = 1.17 · 1021, A2 = 1.23 · 1021, A3 = 1.39 · 1021. Abscissas are orbital periods and D[x] = xFull–xIntermediary. The orbital period is 10.8 hours and r is expressed in Km, which initially is set to 1.560 Km.
Fig. 3
Columns from left to right we have: (i)ρ = 0, A1 = 9.80 · 1020, A2 = 9.8 · 1020, A3 = 1.07 · 1021. (ii)ρ = 0.15, A1 = 1.17 · 1021, A2 = 1.23 · 1021, A3 = 1.39 · 1021. (iii)ρ = 0.35, A1 = 1.06 · 1021, A2 = 1.18 · 1021, A3 = 1.28 · 1021. Abscissas are orbital periods and D[x] = xFull–xIntermediary. The orbital period is 10.8 hours and r is expressed in Km, which initially is set to 1.560 Km.
Fig. 4
Left column e = 0.1 and right column e = 0.5.Abscissas are orbital periods and D[x] = xFull–xIntermediary. The orbital period is 10.8 hours and r is expressed in Km, which initially is set to 1.560 Km.
Fig. 5
Left column (H = 1000Km, T = 22.8h) and right column (H = 2000Km, T = 10.8h), where T is the orbital period expressed in hours. Abscissas are orbital periods and D[x] = xFull–xIntermediary
Fig. 6
(Left) triaxiality region with τ1 = 0.35 and τ2 = 0.9. (Right) Curves cσ1 and cσ2 restricted to interval [0, 1] for ζ = 0.7.
Fig. 7
Parameters: ζ = 0.2, τ1 = 0.3, τ2 = 0.75.
Fig. 8
Parameters: ζ = 0.2, τ1 = 0.6, τ2 = 0.75.
Fig. 9
Special relative equilibria of the body-perpendicular type with ν = ±nπ.
Fig. 10
Special relative equilibria of the body-inclined type.
Fig. 11
Spherical triangles involved in the problem. α is the angle between the two nodes of the orbital plane. (a) Triangle formed by the orbital angular momentum plane, the total angular momentum plane and the reference plane. (b) Triangle formed by the rotational angular momentum plane, the total angular momentum plane and the reference plane.
Anteprima