This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News, 68, 314.BergstromC.2007Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journalsCollege & Research Libraries News6831410.5860/crln.68.5.7804Search in Google Scholar
Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 8(10), P10008, 10001–10012.BlondelV.D.GuillaumeJ.L.LambiotteR.LefebvreE.2008Fast unfolding of communities in large networksJournal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment810P10008100011001210.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008Search in Google Scholar
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30 (1–7), 107–117.BrinS.PageL.1998The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engineComputer Networks and ISDN Systems301–710711710.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-XSearch in Google Scholar
De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.De NooyW.MrvarA.BatageljV.2011Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded second editionCambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511996368Search in Google Scholar
De Visscher, A. (2010). An index to measure a scientist’s specific impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 310–318.De VisscherA.2010An index to measure a scientist’s specific impactJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61231031810.1002/asi.21240Search in Google Scholar
De Visscher, A. (2011). What does the g-index really measure? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2290–2293.De VisscherA.2011What does the g-index really measure?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology62112290229310.1002/asi.21621Search in Google Scholar
Dong, S.B. (1977). A Block–Stodola eigensolution technique for large algebraic systems with non-symmetrical matrices. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 11(2), 247–267.DongS.B.1977A Block–Stodola eigensolution technique for large algebraic systems with non-symmetrical matricesInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering11224726710.1002/nme.1620110204Search in Google Scholar
Franceschet, M. (2011). Page Rank: Standing on the shoulders of giants. Communications of the ACM, 54(6), 92–101.FranceschetM.2011Page Rank: Standing on the shoulders of giantsCommunications of the ACM5469210110.1145/1953122.1953146Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E., & Sher, I.H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14, 195–201.GarfieldE.SherI.H.1963New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexingAmerican Documentation1419520110.1002/asi.5090140304Search in Google Scholar
Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2011). There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalization. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 226–227.GingrasY.LarivièreV.2011There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalizationJournal of Informetrics5122622710.1016/j.joi.2010.10.005Search in Google Scholar
Guerrero-Bote, V.P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 674–688.Guerrero-BoteV.P.Moya-AnegónF.2012A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicatorJournal of Informetrics6467468810.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001Search in Google Scholar
Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7–15.KamadaT.KawaiS.1989An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphsInformation Processing Letters31171510.1142/9789814434478_0005Search in Google Scholar
Kleinberg, J.M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of ACM, 46 (5), 604–632.KleinbergJ.M.1999Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environmentJournal of ACM46560463210.1515/9781400841356.514Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(5), 601–613.LeydesdorffL.2006Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports?Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology57560161310.1002/asi.20322Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are New citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1327–1336.LeydesdorffL.2009How are New citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6071327133610.1002/asi.21024Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2012). Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9), 1901–1902.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.2012Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3)Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6391901190210.1002/asi.22641Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2016). The operationalization of “fields” as WoS Subject Categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “Library and Information Science” and “Science & Technology Studies”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 707–714.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.2016The operationalization of “fields” as WoS Subject Categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “Library and Information Science” and “Science & Technology Studies”Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67370771410.1002/asi.23408Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Opthof, T. (2011). Turning the tables in citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1370–1381.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.MutzR.OpthofT.2011Turning the tables in citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documentsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6271370138110.1002/asi.21534Search in Google Scholar
Milojević, S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Information Metrics (iMetrics): A research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity? Scientometrics, 95(1), 141–157.MilojevićS.LeydesdorffL.2013Information Metrics (iMetrics): A research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity?Scientometrics95114115710.1007/s11192-012-0861-zSearch in Google Scholar
Moed, H.F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265–277.MoedH.F.2010Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journalsJournal of Informetrics4326527710.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002Search in Google Scholar
Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.NarinF.1976Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activityWashington, DCNational Science FoundationSearch in Google Scholar
Nicolaisen, J., & Frandsen, T.F. (2008). The reference return ratio. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 128–135.NicolaisenJ.FrandsenT.F.2008The reference return ratioJournal of Informetrics2212813510.1016/j.joi.2007.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Opthof, T., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 423–430.OpthofT.LeydesdorffL.2010Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performanceJournal of Informetrics4342343010.1016/j.joi.2010.02.003Search in Google Scholar
Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12(5), 297–312.PinskiG.NarinF.1976Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory with application to the literature of physicsInformation Processing and Management12529731210.1016/0306-4573(76)90048-0Search in Google Scholar
Prathap, G. (2014). The best team at IPL 2014 and EPL 2013–2014. Science Reporter, August 44–47.PrathapG.2014The best team at IPL 2014 and EPL 2013–2014Science Reporter, August4447Search in Google Scholar
Prathap, G. & Nishy, P. (in peparation). A size-independent journal impact metric based on social-network analysis. Preprint available at https://www.academia.edu/7765183/A_sizeindependent_journal_impact_metric_based_on_social-network_analysis.PrathapG.NishyP.(in peparation)A size-independent journal impact metric based on social-network analysisPreprint available athttps://www.academia.edu/7765183/A_sizeindependent_journal_impact_metric_based_on_social-network_analysisSearch in Google Scholar
Prathap, G., Nishi, P., & Savithri, S. (in press). On the orthogonality of indicators of journal performance. Current Science.PrathapG.NishiP.SavithriS.On the orthogonality of indicators of journal performanceCurrent Science10.18520/cs/v111/i5/876-881Search in Google Scholar
Price, D.J. de Solla (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292–306.PriceD.J. de Solla1976A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processesJournal of the American Society for Information Science27529230610.1002/asi.4630270505Search in Google Scholar
Price, D.J. de Solla (1981). The analysis of square matrices of scientometric transactions. Scientometrics, 3(1), 55–63.PriceD.J. de Solla1981The analysis of square matrices of scientometric transactionsScientometrics31556310.1007/BF02021864Search in Google Scholar
Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O’Hare, A., Nightingale, P., & Stirling, A. (2012). How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & management. Research Policy, 41(7), 1262–1282.RafolsI.LeydesdorffL.O’HareA.NightingaleP.StirlingA.2012How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & managementResearch Policy4171262128210.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015Search in Google Scholar
Ramanujacharyulu, C. (1964). Analysis of preferential experiments. Psychometrika, 29(3), 257–261.RamanujacharyuluC.1964Analysis of preferential experimentsPsychometrika29325726110.1007/BF02289722Search in Google Scholar
Todeschini, R., Grisoni, F., & Nembri, S. (2015). Weighted power–weakness ratio for multi-criteria decision making. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 146, 329–336.TodeschiniR.GrisoniF.NembriS.2015Weighted power–weakness ratio for multi-criteria decision makingChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems14632933610.1016/j.chemolab.2015.06.005Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., Yan, E., & van Eck, N.J. (2011a). A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: An application to the field of library and information science. Scientometrics, 89(1), 301–314.WaltmanL.YanE.van EckN.J.2011aA recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: An application to the field of library and information scienceScientometrics89130131410.1007/s11192-011-0449-z317166221957321Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., van Eck, N.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., Visser, M.S., & van Raan, A.F.J. (2011b). Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 37–47.WaltmanL.van EckN.J.van LeeuwenT.N.VisserM.S.van RaanA.F.J.2011bTowards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerationsJournal of Informetrics51374710.1016/j.joi.2010.08.001Search in Google Scholar
West, J.D., Bergstrom, T.C., & Bergstrom, C.T. (2010). The Eigenfactor metrics: A network approach to assessing scholarly journals. College and Research Libraries, 71(3), 236–244.WestJ.D.BergstromT.C.BergstromC.T.2010The Eigenfactor metrics: A network approach to assessing scholarly journalsCollege and Research Libraries71323624410.5860/0710236Search in Google Scholar
Wouters, P. (1999). The citation culture. Amsterdam: Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.WoutersP.1999The citation cultureAmsterdamUnpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of AmsterdamSearch in Google Scholar
Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2010). Weighted citation: An indicator of an article’s prestige. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1635–1643.YanE.DingY.2010Weighted citation: An indicator of an article’s prestigeJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6181635164310.1002/asi.21349Search in Google Scholar
Yanovsky, V. (1981). Citation analysis significance of scientific journals. Scientometrics, 3(3), 223–233.YanovskyV.1981Citation analysis significance of scientific journalsScientometrics3322323310.1007/BF02101667Search in Google Scholar
Zhirov, A., Zhirov, O., & Shepelyansky, D.L. (2010). Two-dimensional ranking of Wikipedia articles. The European Physical Journal B, 77(4), 523–531.ZhirovA.ZhirovO.ShepelyanskyD.L.2010Two-dimensional ranking of Wikipedia articlesThe European Physical Journal B77452353110.1140/epjb/e2010-10500-7Search in Google Scholar
