[Alami, I., & Dixon, A. D. (2020). State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversies. Competition & Change, 24(1), 70-94. doi:10.1177/102452941988194910.1177/1024529419881949]Search in Google Scholar
[Amable, B. (2004). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldwin, R. (2006). The euro’s trade effects. (ECB Working Paper No. 594).10.2139/ssrn.886260]Search in Google Scholar
[Belke, A. von Schnurbein. (2012). European monetary policy and the ECB rotation model: Voting power of the core versus the periphery. Public Choice, 1-2(151), 289-323.10.1007/s11127-010-9748-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Blesse, S., Havlik, A., & Heinemann, F. (2019). Searching for a euro reform consensus: The perspective from Central and Eastern Europe. Mannheim: Leibniz Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloomberg. (2020). Euro-area governments set out competing plans for virus aid. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-01/european-commission-proposes-state-wage-support-program]Search in Google Scholar
[BMWi. (2019a). Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 2019. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.]Search in Google Scholar
[BMWi. (2019b). Perspektiven für ein Wirtschaftlich Starkes Europa. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.]Search in Google Scholar
[BMWi. (2020). Fakten zum Deutschen Außenhandel 2019. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery—go. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Böttger, K., & Jopp, M. (2017). Fundamentals of German European policy. German European Policy Series, 1(17).]Search in Google Scholar
[Brezinski, H. (2019). The euro—a German perspective. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 66. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2019-003410.47743/saeb-2019-0034]Search in Google Scholar
[Brunnermeier, M. K., James, H., & Landau, J.-P. (2016). The euro and the battle of ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc774qh]Search in Google Scholar
[Bulmer, S. (2014). Germany and the eurozone crisis: Between hegemony and domestic politics. West European Politics, 37(6), 1244-1263. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.92933310.1080/01402382.2014.929333]Search in Google Scholar
[Bundesfinanzministerium. (2018). Bewegung ins Europäische Projekt bringen. Interview mit dem Bundesfinanzminister Olaf Scholz. Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, 15.04.2018. Pressearchiv Online. Retrieved March 10, 2021 from https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Interviews/2018/2018-04-15-faz-sonntag.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Bundesregierung, die. (2011). Regierungserklärung von Kanzlerin Merkel zum Europäischen Rat und zum Eurogipfel 10.11.2011. Bundesregierung-Archiv. Retrieved March 10, 2021 from https://archiv.bundesregierung.de/archiv-de/dokumente/regierungserklaerung-von-kanzlerin-merkel-zum-europaeischen-rat-und-zum-eurogipfel-1007728]Search in Google Scholar
[Busch, A. (2006). German politics globalisation and national varieties of capitalism: The contested viability of the ‘German model’. German Politics, 125-139. doi:10.1080/0964400050015394810.1080/09644000500153948]Search in Google Scholar
[Cienski, J. (2016, June 28). Poland mourns Brexit. Politico.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dabrowski, M., & Rostowski, J. (2006). The eastern enlargement of the eurozone. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/b136026]Search in Google Scholar
[Dandashly, A., & Verdun, A. (2018). Euro adoption in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland: Laggards by default and Laggards by choice Oa. Comparative European Politics, 16(3), 385-412. doi:10.1057/cep.2015.4610.1057/cep.2015.46]Search in Google Scholar
[Darvas, Z., & Szapáry, G. (2008). Euro area enlargement and euro adoption strategies. (IEHAS Discussion Papers No. 24).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dellas, H., & Tavlas, G. S. (2009). An optimum-currency-area odyssey. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(7), 1117-1137. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.06.00110.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Destatis. (2020). Außenhandel: Rangfolge der Handelspartner im Außenhandel der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Statistisches Bundesamt.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dyson, K., & Featherstone, K. (1999). The road to Maastricht: Negotiating economic and monetary union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019829638X.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Dyson, K., & Sepos, A. (2010). Differentiation as design principle and as tool in the political management of European integration. In K. Dyson, & A. Sepos (Eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration (pp. 3-23). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[EBRD. (2020). Transition report 2020-21: The state strikes back.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eichengreen, B. (2014, March 3). The eurozone crisis: The theory of optimum currency areas bites back.]Search in Google Scholar
[Euractiv.de. (2014, June 19). ECB voting rights ‘rotation’ raises fears in Germany. Retrieved March 10, 2020 from https://www.euractiv.com/section/euro-finance/news/ecb-voting-rights-rotation-raises-fears-in-germany]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2017). President Jean-Claude Juncker’s state of the Union Address 2017. Retrieved November 23, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_17_3165]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2020a, June). Convergence report 2020. (European Economy Institutional Paper No. 129). doi:10.2765/508213]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2020b). Introduction of the euro in the Member States that have not yet adopted the common currency: May-June 2020. Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Council. (2016). European Council meeting (18 and 19 February 2016)—Conclusions. Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurostat. (2020a). Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at market prices—annual data. Retrieved December 7, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tipsau10/default/table?lang=en]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurostat. (2020b). Net international investment position: Quarterly data, per cent of GDP. Retrieved December 6, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tipsii40/default/table?lang=en]Search in Google Scholar
[Fabry, A. (2019). The political economy of Hungary: From state capitalism to authoritarian neoliberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-10594-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Festoc, F., L’Oeillet, G., & Roudaut, N. (2017). Would CEEC international trade be higher with the euro? Evidence from sectoral data. Revue d’Études Comparatives Est-Ouest, 3-4, 247-275.10.3917/receo.483.0247]Search in Google Scholar
[Gábor, J. (2020). Impact of Brexit on voting power in Council of the European Union. Open Political Science, 3(1), 192-197. doi:10.1515/openps-2020-001610.1515/openps-2020-0016]Search in Google Scholar
[Groszkowski, J. (2011). Slovakia: The Eurogroup’s enfant terrible. OSW-Commentary, 18.20.2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halas, M. (2018). A model disagreement: The fall of the Slovak government during the eurozone crisis in 2011. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(9), 1472-1495. doi:10.1080/0 9668136.2018.1515347]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, P. A. (2018). Varieties of capitalism in light of the euro crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 7-30. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.131027810.1080/13501763.2017.1310278]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.) (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199247757.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Hancké, B. (Ed.) (2009). Debating varieties of capitalism: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heinemann, F., Osterloh, S., & Kalb, A. (2014). Sovereign risk premia: The link between fiscal rules and stability culture. Journal of International Money and Finance, 41, 110-127. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.11.00210.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.11.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Hillebrand, R. (2015). Germany and its eurozone crisis policy: The impact of the country’s ordoliberal heritage. German Politics and Society, 33(1), 6-24. doi:10.3167/gps.2015.33010210.3167/gps.2015.330102]Search in Google Scholar
[Hobolt, S. B. (2014). Ever closer or ever wider? Public attitudes towards further enlargement and integration in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(5), 664-680. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.89774610.1080/13501763.2014.897746]Search in Google Scholar
[Horvath, J. (2011). Optimum currency area theory: A selective review. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.101548010.2139/ssrn.1015480]Search in Google Scholar
[Howarth, D., & Rommerskirchen, C. (2013). A panacea for all times? The German stability culture as strategic political resource. West European Politics, 36(4), 750-770. doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.78335510.1080/01402382.2013.783355]Search in Google Scholar
[Howarth, D., & Schild, J. (2021). Nein to ‘Transfer Union’: The German brake on the construction of a European Union fiscal capacity. Journal of European Integration, 43(2), 207-224. doi:10.1080/07036337.2021.187769010.1080/07036337.2021.1877690]Search in Google Scholar
[Hüttmann, M. G. (2021). Leitbilder Deutscher Europapolitik. In K. Böttger & M. Jopp (Eds.), Handbuch zur deutschen Europapolitik (pp. 31-45). Baden-Baden: Nomos.10.5771/9783748909514-31]Search in Google Scholar
[IMF. (2015). Central and Eastern Europe: New Member States Policy Forum 2014. (International Monetary Fund Country Report No. 15/98).10.5089/9781484321393.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Iversen, T., Soskice, D., & Hope, D. (2016). The eurozone and political economic institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 163-185.10.1146/annurev-polisci-022615-113243]Search in Google Scholar
[Jasiecki, K. (2017). The nature of capitalism in Poland. Controversy over the economy since the end of 2015: The prospects of business elite and employer associations. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 8(3), 171-193.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnston, A., & Regan, A. (2016). European monetary integration and the incompatibility of national varieties of capitalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 318-336. doi:10.1111/jcms.1228910.1111/jcms.12289]Search in Google Scholar
[Juneja, J. (2017). How Germany benefits the most from its eurozone membership. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1074-1088. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.04210.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.042]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiohos, A., & Stoupos, N. (2018). Re-exploring the enlargement of the eurozone: Evidence from the new Member-States. International Economic Journal, 32(2), 177-198. doi:10.1080/10168737.2018.148064610.1080/10168737.2018.1480646]Search in Google Scholar
[Klein, J., Plottka, J., & Tittel, A. (2018). Der Neustart der Europäischen Integration durch eine inklusive Avantgarde?. Integration, 41(2), 141-168. doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2018-2-14110.5771/0720-5120-2018-2-141]Search in Google Scholar
[Kleinowski, M. (2019). The impact of Brexit on the voting power in the Council of the European Union. Przegląd Europejski, 4, 95-117. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0013.345610.5604/01.3001.0013.3456]Search in Google Scholar
[Kowalski, T. (2021). The post-2015 institutional shock in Poland: Some empirical findings. CESifo Forum, 22(1), 43-48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krugman, P. (2012). Revenge of the optimum currency area. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 27(1), 439-448. doi:10.1086/66918810.1086/669188]Search in Google Scholar
[Mihm von, A., & Mussler, W. (2020, July 17). Weshalb Bulgarien und Kroatien noch immer EU-Wackelkandidaten Sind. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mody, A. (2018). EuroTragedy: A drama in nine acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199351381.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Morawiecki, M. (2016, October 16). The Polish case for less economic liberalism. Politico.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musacchio, A., & Lazzarini, S. G. (2014). Reinventing state capitalism. Leviathan in business, Brazil and beyond. Cambridge, London: Oxford University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674419582]Search in Google Scholar
[Myant, M., & Drahokoupil, J. (2015). Varieties of capitalism in transition economies. In M. Ebenau, I. Bruff & C. May (Eds.), New directions in critical comparative capitalisms (pp. 155-171). London: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670-702. doi:10.1017/S004388710999009810.1017/S0043887109990098]Search in Google Scholar
[Ondarza von, N. (2013). “Auf dem Weg zur Union in der Union. Institutionelle Auswirkungen der differenzierten Integration in der Eurozone auf die EU. Integration, 36(1), 17-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pérez, S. A. (2019). A Europe of creditor and debtor states: Explaining the north / south divide in the eurozone. West European Politics, 42(5), 989-1014. doi:10.1080/0140 2382.2019.1573403]Search in Google Scholar
[Petersen, T., Böhmer, M., & Stein vom, H. (2013). How Germany benefits from the euro in economic. Policy Brief Bertelsmann Stiftung, 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rapacki, R. (Ed.) (2019). Diversity of patchwork capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reuters. (2017a). Euro zone enlargement call sparks backlash in Germany. Retrieved October 25, 2020 from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-eurozone-enlargement-idUSKCN1BQ2IJ]Search in Google Scholar
[Reuters. (2017b, September 13). Juncker’s EU Plan is largely in line with Germany’s vision: Schaeuble. Reuters.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sandbu, M. (2015). Europe’s orphan: The future of the euro and the politics of debt. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D., & Rittberger, B. (2015). The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: Interdependence, politicization and differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 764-782. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.102083510.1080/13501763.2015.1020835]Search in Google Scholar
[Schimmelfennig, F., & Winzen, T. (2020). Ever looser Union?: Differentiated European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198854333.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. Business, labor and challenges of equitable development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107300446]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoeller, M. G. (2020). Germany, the problem of leadership, and Institution-building in EMU reform. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 23(3), 309-324. doi:10.1080/17487870.2018.154141010.1080/17487870.2018.1541410]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoeller, M. G., & Karlsson, O. (2021). Championing the ‘German Model’? Germany’s consistent preferences on the integration of fiscal constraints. Journal of European Integration, 43(2), 191-206. doi:10.1080/07036337.2021.187769710.1080/07036337.2021.1877697]Search in Google Scholar
[Sinn, H.-W. (2020). The economics of target balances. From Lehmann to Corona. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-50170-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Skouras, T. (2019). On a low-competitiveness country joining the eurozone: Are there lessons from Greece?. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.336553210.2139/ssrn.3365532]Search in Google Scholar
[Sørensen, C. (2020). Three reasons why Denmark could transform its relationship with the EU. European Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from https://ecfr.eu/article/three-reasons-why-denmark-could-transform-its-relationship-with-the-u/]Search in Google Scholar
[Sperber, N. (2019). The many lives of state capitalism: From classical Marxism to free-market advocacy. History of the Human Sciences, 32(3), 100-124. doi:10.1177/095269511881555310.1177/0952695118815553]Search in Google Scholar
[Spiegel, P., Peel, Q., Barker, A., & Pignal, S. (2011, December 9). Britain’s cold shoulder for Europe. Financial Times.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steen, M. (2012, September 6). Weidmann isolated as ECB plan approved. Financial Times.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tokarski, P., & Funk, S. (2018, December). Die Nicht-Euro-Staaten in der EU nach dem Brexit. SWP-Aktuell, 68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Visvizi, A., & Tokarski, P. (2014). Poland and the euro: Between lock-in and unfinished transition. Society and Economy, 36(4), 445-468. doi:10.1556/SocEc.36.2014.4.110.1556/SocEc.36.2014.4.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Visvizi, A., & Tokarski, P. (2018). Poland and the re-categorization of the eurozone entry: From a legal obligation to a political issue. Law in Eastern Europe, 67, 113-133. doi:10.1163/9789004352070_00910.1163/9789004352070_009]Search in Google Scholar
[Zank, W. (2019). Insufficient data, short time spans, illusions and multiple pressures: Designing the German Monetary Union in 1990. Economics and Business Review, 5(1), 53-78. doi:10.18559/ebr.2019.1.410.18559/ebr.2019.1.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, X., & Walter, A. (2012). East Asian capitalism: Diversity, continuity, and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1142/8505]Search in Google Scholar