Accesso libero

Germany’s attitude towards the enlargement of the eurozone

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Alami, I., & Dixon, A. D. (2020). State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversies. Competition & Change, 24(1), 70-94. doi:10.1177/102452941988194910.1177/1024529419881949Search in Google Scholar

Amable, B. (2004). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baldwin, R. (2006). The euro’s trade effects. (ECB Working Paper No. 594).10.2139/ssrn.886260Search in Google Scholar

Belke, A. von Schnurbein. (2012). European monetary policy and the ECB rotation model: Voting power of the core versus the periphery. Public Choice, 1-2(151), 289-323.10.1007/s11127-010-9748-9Search in Google Scholar

Blesse, S., Havlik, A., & Heinemann, F. (2019). Searching for a euro reform consensus: The perspective from Central and Eastern Europe. Mannheim: Leibniz Association.Search in Google Scholar

Bloomberg. (2020). Euro-area governments set out competing plans for virus aid. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-01/european-commission-proposes-state-wage-support-programSearch in Google Scholar

BMWi. (2019a). Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 2019. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.Search in Google Scholar

BMWi. (2019b). Perspektiven für ein Wirtschaftlich Starkes Europa. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.Search in Google Scholar

BMWi. (2020). Fakten zum Deutschen Außenhandel 2019. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.Search in Google Scholar

Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery—go. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Böttger, K., & Jopp, M. (2017). Fundamentals of German European policy. German European Policy Series, 1(17).Search in Google Scholar

Brezinski, H. (2019). The euro—a German perspective. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 66. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2019-003410.47743/saeb-2019-0034Search in Google Scholar

Brunnermeier, M. K., James, H., & Landau, J.-P. (2016). The euro and the battle of ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc774qhSearch in Google Scholar

Bulmer, S. (2014). Germany and the eurozone crisis: Between hegemony and domestic politics. West European Politics, 37(6), 1244-1263. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.92933310.1080/01402382.2014.929333Search in Google Scholar

Bundesfinanzministerium. (2018). Bewegung ins Europäische Projekt bringen. Interview mit dem Bundesfinanzminister Olaf Scholz. Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, 15.04.2018. Pressearchiv Online. Retrieved March 10, 2021 from https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Interviews/2018/2018-04-15-faz-sonntag.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Bundesregierung, die. (2011). Regierungserklärung von Kanzlerin Merkel zum Europäischen Rat und zum Eurogipfel 10.11.2011. Bundesregierung-Archiv. Retrieved March 10, 2021 from https://archiv.bundesregierung.de/archiv-de/dokumente/regierungserklaerung-von-kanzlerin-merkel-zum-europaeischen-rat-und-zum-eurogipfel-1007728Search in Google Scholar

Busch, A. (2006). German politics globalisation and national varieties of capitalism: The contested viability of the ‘German model’. German Politics, 125-139. doi:10.1080/0964400050015394810.1080/09644000500153948Search in Google Scholar

Cienski, J. (2016, June 28). Poland mourns Brexit. Politico.Search in Google Scholar

Dabrowski, M., & Rostowski, J. (2006). The eastern enlargement of the eurozone. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/b136026Search in Google Scholar

Dandashly, A., & Verdun, A. (2018). Euro adoption in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland: Laggards by default and Laggards by choice Oa. Comparative European Politics, 16(3), 385-412. doi:10.1057/cep.2015.4610.1057/cep.2015.46Search in Google Scholar

Darvas, Z., & Szapáry, G. (2008). Euro area enlargement and euro adoption strategies. (IEHAS Discussion Papers No. 24).Search in Google Scholar

Dellas, H., & Tavlas, G. S. (2009). An optimum-currency-area odyssey. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(7), 1117-1137. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.06.00110.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Destatis. (2020). Außenhandel: Rangfolge der Handelspartner im Außenhandel der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Statistisches Bundesamt.Search in Google Scholar

Dyson, K., & Featherstone, K. (1999). The road to Maastricht: Negotiating economic and monetary union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019829638X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dyson, K., & Sepos, A. (2010). Differentiation as design principle and as tool in the political management of European integration. In K. Dyson, & A. Sepos (Eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration (pp. 3-23). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

EBRD. (2020). Transition report 2020-21: The state strikes back.Search in Google Scholar

Eichengreen, B. (2014, March 3). The eurozone crisis: The theory of optimum currency areas bites back.Search in Google Scholar

Euractiv.de. (2014, June 19). ECB voting rights ‘rotation’ raises fears in Germany. Retrieved March 10, 2020 from https://www.euractiv.com/section/euro-finance/news/ecb-voting-rights-rotation-raises-fears-in-germanySearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2017). President Jean-Claude Juncker’s state of the Union Address 2017. Retrieved November 23, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_17_3165Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2020a, June). Convergence report 2020. (European Economy Institutional Paper No. 129). doi:10.2765/508213Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2020b). Introduction of the euro in the Member States that have not yet adopted the common currency: May-June 2020. Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

European Council. (2016). European Council meeting (18 and 19 February 2016)—Conclusions. Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2020a). Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at market prices—annual data. Retrieved December 7, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tipsau10/default/table?lang=enSearch in Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2020b). Net international investment position: Quarterly data, per cent of GDP. Retrieved December 6, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tipsii40/default/table?lang=enSearch in Google Scholar

Fabry, A. (2019). The political economy of Hungary: From state capitalism to authoritarian neoliberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-10594-5Search in Google Scholar

Festoc, F., L’Oeillet, G., & Roudaut, N. (2017). Would CEEC international trade be higher with the euro? Evidence from sectoral data. Revue d’Études Comparatives Est-Ouest, 3-4, 247-275.10.3917/receo.483.0247Search in Google Scholar

Gábor, J. (2020). Impact of Brexit on voting power in Council of the European Union. Open Political Science, 3(1), 192-197. doi:10.1515/openps-2020-001610.1515/openps-2020-0016Search in Google Scholar

Groszkowski, J. (2011). Slovakia: The Eurogroup’s enfant terrible. OSW-Commentary, 18.20.2011.Search in Google Scholar

Halas, M. (2018). A model disagreement: The fall of the Slovak government during the eurozone crisis in 2011. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(9), 1472-1495. doi:10.1080/0 9668136.2018.1515347Search in Google Scholar

Hall, P. A. (2018). Varieties of capitalism in light of the euro crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 7-30. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.131027810.1080/13501763.2017.1310278Search in Google Scholar

Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.) (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199247757.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hancké, B. (Ed.) (2009). Debating varieties of capitalism: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heinemann, F., Osterloh, S., & Kalb, A. (2014). Sovereign risk premia: The link between fiscal rules and stability culture. Journal of International Money and Finance, 41, 110-127. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.11.00210.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.11.002Search in Google Scholar

Hillebrand, R. (2015). Germany and its eurozone crisis policy: The impact of the country’s ordoliberal heritage. German Politics and Society, 33(1), 6-24. doi:10.3167/gps.2015.33010210.3167/gps.2015.330102Search in Google Scholar

Hobolt, S. B. (2014). Ever closer or ever wider? Public attitudes towards further enlargement and integration in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(5), 664-680. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.89774610.1080/13501763.2014.897746Search in Google Scholar

Horvath, J. (2011). Optimum currency area theory: A selective review. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.101548010.2139/ssrn.1015480Search in Google Scholar

Howarth, D., & Rommerskirchen, C. (2013). A panacea for all times? The German stability culture as strategic political resource. West European Politics, 36(4), 750-770. doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.78335510.1080/01402382.2013.783355Search in Google Scholar

Howarth, D., & Schild, J. (2021). Nein to ‘Transfer Union’: The German brake on the construction of a European Union fiscal capacity. Journal of European Integration, 43(2), 207-224. doi:10.1080/07036337.2021.187769010.1080/07036337.2021.1877690Search in Google Scholar

Hüttmann, M. G. (2021). Leitbilder Deutscher Europapolitik. In K. Böttger & M. Jopp (Eds.), Handbuch zur deutschen Europapolitik (pp. 31-45). Baden-Baden: Nomos.10.5771/9783748909514-31Search in Google Scholar

IMF. (2015). Central and Eastern Europe: New Member States Policy Forum 2014. (International Monetary Fund Country Report No. 15/98).10.5089/9781484321393.002Search in Google Scholar

Iversen, T., Soskice, D., & Hope, D. (2016). The eurozone and political economic institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 163-185.10.1146/annurev-polisci-022615-113243Search in Google Scholar

Jasiecki, K. (2017). The nature of capitalism in Poland. Controversy over the economy since the end of 2015: The prospects of business elite and employer associations. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 8(3), 171-193.Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, A., & Regan, A. (2016). European monetary integration and the incompatibility of national varieties of capitalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 318-336. doi:10.1111/jcms.1228910.1111/jcms.12289Search in Google Scholar

Juneja, J. (2017). How Germany benefits the most from its eurozone membership. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1074-1088. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.04210.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.042Search in Google Scholar

Kiohos, A., & Stoupos, N. (2018). Re-exploring the enlargement of the eurozone: Evidence from the new Member-States. International Economic Journal, 32(2), 177-198. doi:10.1080/10168737.2018.148064610.1080/10168737.2018.1480646Search in Google Scholar

Klein, J., Plottka, J., & Tittel, A. (2018). Der Neustart der Europäischen Integration durch eine inklusive Avantgarde?. Integration, 41(2), 141-168. doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2018-2-14110.5771/0720-5120-2018-2-141Search in Google Scholar

Kleinowski, M. (2019). The impact of Brexit on the voting power in the Council of the European Union. Przegląd Europejski, 4, 95-117. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0013.345610.5604/01.3001.0013.3456Search in Google Scholar

Kowalski, T. (2021). The post-2015 institutional shock in Poland: Some empirical findings. CESifo Forum, 22(1), 43-48.Search in Google Scholar

Krugman, P. (2012). Revenge of the optimum currency area. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 27(1), 439-448. doi:10.1086/66918810.1086/669188Search in Google Scholar

Mihm von, A., & Mussler, W. (2020, July 17). Weshalb Bulgarien und Kroatien noch immer EU-Wackelkandidaten Sind. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.Search in Google Scholar

Mody, A. (2018). EuroTragedy: A drama in nine acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199351381.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Morawiecki, M. (2016, October 16). The Polish case for less economic liberalism. Politico.Search in Google Scholar

Musacchio, A., & Lazzarini, S. G. (2014). Reinventing state capitalism. Leviathan in business, Brazil and beyond. Cambridge, London: Oxford University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674419582Search in Google Scholar

Myant, M., & Drahokoupil, J. (2015). Varieties of capitalism in transition economies. In M. Ebenau, I. Bruff & C. May (Eds.), New directions in critical comparative capitalisms (pp. 155-171). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670-702. doi:10.1017/S004388710999009810.1017/S0043887109990098Search in Google Scholar

Ondarza von, N. (2013). “Auf dem Weg zur Union in der Union. Institutionelle Auswirkungen der differenzierten Integration in der Eurozone auf die EU. Integration, 36(1), 17-33.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez, S. A. (2019). A Europe of creditor and debtor states: Explaining the north / south divide in the eurozone. West European Politics, 42(5), 989-1014. doi:10.1080/0140 2382.2019.1573403Search in Google Scholar

Petersen, T., Böhmer, M., & Stein vom, H. (2013). How Germany benefits from the euro in economic. Policy Brief Bertelsmann Stiftung, 1.Search in Google Scholar

Rapacki, R. (Ed.) (2019). Diversity of patchwork capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Reuters. (2017a). Euro zone enlargement call sparks backlash in Germany. Retrieved October 25, 2020 from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-eurozone-enlargement-idUSKCN1BQ2IJSearch in Google Scholar

Reuters. (2017b, September 13). Juncker’s EU Plan is largely in line with Germany’s vision: Schaeuble. Reuters.Search in Google Scholar

Sandbu, M. (2015). Europe’s orphan: The future of the euro and the politics of debt. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D., & Rittberger, B. (2015). The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: Interdependence, politicization and differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 764-782. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.102083510.1080/13501763.2015.1020835Search in Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, F., & Winzen, T. (2020). Ever looser Union?: Differentiated European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198854333.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. Business, labor and challenges of equitable development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107300446Search in Google Scholar

Schoeller, M. G. (2020). Germany, the problem of leadership, and Institution-building in EMU reform. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 23(3), 309-324. doi:10.1080/17487870.2018.154141010.1080/17487870.2018.1541410Search in Google Scholar

Schoeller, M. G., & Karlsson, O. (2021). Championing the ‘German Model’? Germany’s consistent preferences on the integration of fiscal constraints. Journal of European Integration, 43(2), 191-206. doi:10.1080/07036337.2021.187769710.1080/07036337.2021.1877697Search in Google Scholar

Sinn, H.-W. (2020). The economics of target balances. From Lehmann to Corona. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-50170-9Search in Google Scholar

Skouras, T. (2019). On a low-competitiveness country joining the eurozone: Are there lessons from Greece?. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.336553210.2139/ssrn.3365532Search in Google Scholar

Sørensen, C. (2020). Three reasons why Denmark could transform its relationship with the EU. European Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from https://ecfr.eu/article/three-reasons-why-denmark-could-transform-its-relationship-with-the-u/Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, N. (2019). The many lives of state capitalism: From classical Marxism to free-market advocacy. History of the Human Sciences, 32(3), 100-124. doi:10.1177/095269511881555310.1177/0952695118815553Search in Google Scholar

Spiegel, P., Peel, Q., Barker, A., & Pignal, S. (2011, December 9). Britain’s cold shoulder for Europe. Financial Times.Search in Google Scholar

Steen, M. (2012, September 6). Weidmann isolated as ECB plan approved. Financial Times.Search in Google Scholar

Tokarski, P., & Funk, S. (2018, December). Die Nicht-Euro-Staaten in der EU nach dem Brexit. SWP-Aktuell, 68.Search in Google Scholar

Visvizi, A., & Tokarski, P. (2014). Poland and the euro: Between lock-in and unfinished transition. Society and Economy, 36(4), 445-468. doi:10.1556/SocEc.36.2014.4.110.1556/SocEc.36.2014.4.1Search in Google Scholar

Visvizi, A., & Tokarski, P. (2018). Poland and the re-categorization of the eurozone entry: From a legal obligation to a political issue. Law in Eastern Europe, 67, 113-133. doi:10.1163/9789004352070_00910.1163/9789004352070_009Search in Google Scholar

Zank, W. (2019). Insufficient data, short time spans, illusions and multiple pressures: Designing the German Monetary Union in 1990. Economics and Business Review, 5(1), 53-78. doi:10.18559/ebr.2019.1.410.18559/ebr.2019.1.4Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, X., & Walter, A. (2012). East Asian capitalism: Diversity, continuity, and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1142/8505Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2450-0097
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Business and Economics, Political Economics, other, Finance, Mathematics and Statistics for Economists, Econometrics