[55th HAv Forum. (2019, June). Unpublished materials thanks to the courtesy of organisers, 05.06.209, Hamburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[ABL Airbus BizLab. (2017). https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=airbus+bizlab&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72-95.10.1002/sej.1266]Search in Google Scholar
[Aznar-Sanchez, J. A., Carretero-Gómez, A. (2016). Multinational corporations and cluster evolution: The case of Cosentino in the Spanish marble cluster. In F. Belussi, & J. L. Hervas-Oliver (Eds.), Unfolding cluster evolution. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bailey, C., & De Propis, L. (2014). Manufacturing reshoring and its limits: The UK automotive case. Cambridge Journal of Regional Economy and Society, 7, 379-395.10.1093/cjres/rsu019]Search in Google Scholar
[Barzotto, M., Corò, G., & Volpe, M. (2017). Sustaining industrial districts by leveraging on global and local value chains: Evidence from manufacturing multinational companies. In G. Gereffi, V. De Marchi, & E. Di Maria (Eds.), Local clusters in global value chains: Linking actors and territories through manufacturing and innovation. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J., (2018). Relational research design in economic geography. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, M. S. Gertler, & D. Wójcik (eds.), The New Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 179-196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bathelt, H., & Taylor, M. (2002). Clusters, power and place: Inequality and local growth in time–space. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 84(2), 93-109.10.1111/j.0435-3684.2002.00116.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369-385.10.2307/248684]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74.10.1080/0034340052000320887]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bradley, J., Loucks, J., Macaulay, J., Noronha, A., & Wade, M. (2015). Digital vortex: How digital disruption is redefining industries. Global Center for Digital Business Transformation: An IMD and Cisco initiative. Retrieved from https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/industry-solutions/digital-vortex-report.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brinkhoff, S., Suwala, L., & Kulke, E. (2016). Managing innovation in ‘localities of learning’ in Berlin and Seville. In G. Micek (Ed.), Understanding innovation in emerging economic spaces (pp. 11-32). London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buciuni, G., & Pisano, G. P. (2015). Can Marshall’s clusters survive globalization?. (Harvard Business School Working Paper 15-088).]Search in Google Scholar
[Buxbaum-Conradi, S. (2018). Global and local knowledge dynamics in an industry during modular transition: A case study of the Airbus production network and the Aerospace Cluster in Hamburg, Northern Germany. PhD Dissertation, HSU, Hamburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cantner, U., Graf, H., & Töpfer, S., (2015). Structural dynamics of innovation networks in German leading-edge clusters. (Jena Economic Research Papers, No. 2015-026). Jena: Friedrich Schiller University Jena.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cantwell, J., & Salmon, J. (2018). The effects of global connectivity on knowledge complexity in the information age. In International business in the information and digital age, 123-137. Retrieved November 2, 2018 from https://doi.org/10.1108/S1745-88622018000001300610.1108/S1745-886220180000013006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Capozza, C., Salomone, S., & Somma, E. (2018). Local industrial structure, agglomeration economies and the creation of innovative start-ups: evidence from the Italian case. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(7-8), 749-775.10.1080/08985626.2018.1457087]Search in Google Scholar
[Castelo-Branco, I., Cruz-Jesus, F., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: Evidence for the European Union. Computers in Industry, 107, 22-32.10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Cluster Platform Deutschland. Retrieved October 10, 2019 from https://www.cluster-plattform.de/CLUSTER/Navigation/EN/NationalLevel/SpitzenclusterWettbewerb/spitzencluster-wettbewerb.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491.10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davids, M.& Frenken K. (2018). Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: Towards an integrated framework, Regional Studies, 52(1), 23-34.10.1080/00343404.2017.1287349]Search in Google Scholar
[Dohse, D., Fornahl, D., & Vehrke, J. (2018). Fostering place-based innovation and internationalization–the new turn in German technology policy. European Planning Studies, 26(6), 1137-1159.10.1080/09654313.2018.1458285]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dominguez, N., & Mayrhofer, U. (2017). Internationalization stages of traditional SMEs: Increasing, decreasing and re-increasing commitment to foreign markets. International Business Review, 26(6), 1051-1063.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.03.010]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dubé, L., & Paré, G., (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 597-635. eFactory. Retrieved June 6, 2019 from https://www.efactory-project.eu10.2307/30036550]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.10.5465/amr.1989.4308385]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.10.5465/amj.2007.24160888]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ferreira, J. J., Raposo, M., Rutten, R., & Varga, A. (Eds.). (2013). Cooperation, clusters, and knowledge transfer, universities and firms towards regional competitiveness. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-33194-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Fletcher, M., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2011). Case selection in international business: Key issues and common misconceptions. In R. Piekkari, C. Welch (Eds.), Rethinking the case study in international business and management research (pp. 171-191). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fletcher, M., Zhao, Y., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Buck, T. (2018). Three pathways to case selection in international business: A twenty–year review, analysis and synthesis. International Business Review, 27(4), 755-766.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.12.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fromhold-Eisebith, M. (2017). Intra-regional collaborative learning between cluster initiatives–a factor of cluster (policy) dynamics?. The Life Cycle of Clusters: A Policy Perspective, 95, 95-114.10.4337/9781784719289.00013]Search in Google Scholar
[Garms, F., Jansen, C., Schmitz, C., Hallerstede, S., & Tschiesner A. (2019). Capturing value at scale in discrete manufacturing with Industry 4.0. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/advanced-electronics/our-insights/capturing-value-at-scale-in-discrete-manufacturing-with-industry-4-0?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck&hlkid=389d21c6dda647a39245d88e103b1cb7&hctky=10097535&hdpid=883f9ba4-705d-4847-9c94-584d6be5a990]Search in Google Scholar
[Gereffi, G., De Marchi, V., & Di Maria, E. (Eds.). (2017). Local clusters in global value chains: Linking actors and territories through manufacturing and innovation. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31.10.1177/1094428112452151]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology – The Journal of The British Sociological Association, 12(1), 27-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gligor, D. M., Esmark, C. L., & Gölgeci, I. (2016). Building international business theory: A grounded theory approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1), 93-111.10.1057/jibs.2015.35]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Götz, M., & Jankowska B. (2017). Clusters and Industry 4.0–do they fit together?. European Planning Studies, 25(9), 1633-1653.10.1080/09654313.2017.1327037]Search in Google Scholar
[Götz, M., & Jankowska, B. (2018). On the role of clusters in fostering the Industry 4.0. In R. Van Tulder, A. Verbeke, L. Piscitello (Eds.), International business in the information and digital age, progress in international business research (vol. 13, pp. 379-390). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited Howard House.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hervas-Oliver, J. L. (2019). The positive leverage of isomorphism: Endogenous collective action for transition into Industry 4.0 in industrial districts. (Paper to be presented at DRUID19 Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, June 19-21).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Estelles-Miguel, S., Mallol-Gasch, G., & Boix-Palomero, J. (2019). A place-based policy for promoting Industry 4.0: The case of the Castellon ceramic tile district. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1838-1856.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hintze, A. (2018). Entwicklung und Implementierung einer Cluster-Dachmarke-Konzeptualisierung auf strukturationstheoretischer Basis am Beispiel des Luftfahrtclusters Metropolregion Hamburg. Hamburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huggins, R., Izushi, H., & Prokop, D. (2019). Regional advantage and the geography of networks: Explaining global–local knowledge sourcing patterns. Papers in Regional Science, 98, 1567-1584.10.1111/pirs.12423]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jankowska, B., Götz, M., & Główka, C. (2017). Intra-cluster cooperation enhancing SMEs’ competitiveness: The role of cluster organisations in Poland. Investigaciones Regionales — Journal of Regional Research, 39, 195-214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Janssen, M. J., & Frenken, K. (2019). Cross-specialisation policy: rationales and options for linking unrelated industries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(2), 195-212.10.1093/cjres/rsz001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0. Frankfurt am Main: Acatech.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ketels, C., (2004, June 2). All together. fDi Magazine (6).]Search in Google Scholar
[Labhard, V., McAdam, P., Petroulakis, F., & Vivian, L., (2019). Challenges in the digital age. Retrieved August 27, 2019 from https://voxeu.org/article/challenges-digital-age]Search in Google Scholar
[Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2017). Territorial servitization: Exploring the virtuous circle connecting knowledge-intensive services and new manufacturing businesses. International Journal of Production Economics, 92, 19-28.10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lagendijk, A., & Lorentzen, A. (2007). Proximity, knowledge and innovation in peripheral regions. On the intersection between geographical and organizational proximity. European Planning Studies, 15(4), 457-466.10.1080/09654310601133260]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Laplume, A. O., Petersen, B., & Pearce J. M. (2016). Global value chains from a 3D printing perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5), 595-609.10.1057/jibs.2015.47]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Laudien, S. M., & Daxböck, B. (2016). Path dependence as a barrier to business model change in manufacturing firms: Insights from a multiple-case study. Journal of Business Economics, 86(6), 611-645.10.1007/s11573-015-0793-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Lazerson, M., & Lorenzoni, G. (2008). Transforming industrial districts: How leading firms are escaping the manufacturing cage. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. Smith Ring (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 31-60). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lis, A. M., (2019). The significance of proximity in cluster initiatives. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 29(3), 287-310.10.1108/CR-08-2018-0050]Search in Google Scholar
[Ludwig, A. (2019). From free to fee: A behavioural perspective on why companies avoid paying for cluster services. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 10(2), 143-162.10.1504/IJGSB.2019.097930]Search in Google Scholar
[MAKERS experts–A project funded under the EU Research and Innovation programme Horizon 2020 and a Research and Innovation Staff Exchange project under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions. Retrieved from http://www.makers-rise.org/about/]Search in Google Scholar
[Marschan-Piekkari, R., & Welch, C. (Eds.). (2011). Rethinking the case study in international business and management research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9780857933461]Search in Google Scholar
[Martineau, C., & Pastoriza, D. (2016). International involvement of established SMEs: A systematic review of antecedents, outcomes and moderators. International Business Review, 25(2), 458-470.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.07.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Maskell, P., & Lorenzen, M. (2003). The cluster as market organization. (DRUID Working Papers, No. 03-14). Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy / Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.]Search in Google Scholar
[Micek, G. (2016). Shortcomings and weaknesses in understanding and measuring knowledge interactions. In G. Micek (Ed.), understanding innovation in emerging economic spaces (pp. 55-72). London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morgulis-Yakushev, S., & Sölvell, Ö. (2017). Enhancing dynamism in clusters. Competitiveness Review, 27(2), 98-112.10.1108/CR-02-2016-0015]Search in Google Scholar
[Nonaka, I. (2008, December 11). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parrino, L. (2015). Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(3), 261-271.10.1057/kmrp.2013.47]Search in Google Scholar
[Philbeck, T., & Davis, N. (2019). The fourth industrial revolution: Shaping a new era. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1, Fall/Winter).]Search in Google Scholar
[Piekkari, R., Welch, C., & Paavilainen, E. (2009). The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 567-589.10.1177/1094428108319905]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pietrewicz, L. (2019, March 21-22). Coordination in the age of Industry 4.0 (38th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development, Book of Proceedings, pp. 264-274).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pisano, G.,P., & Shih, W. C. (2009). Restoring American competitiveness. Harvard Business Review, 87(7-8), 114-125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pisano, G. P., & Shih, W. C. (2012). Does America really need manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, 90(3), 94-102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-34.10.1177/089124240001400105]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pratt, M. G. (2009). For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856-862.10.5465/amj.2009.44632557]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Puig, F. (2019). New insights regarding clusters and industrial districts. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 29(3), 206-210.10.1108/CR-03-2019-0033]Search in Google Scholar
[Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (2009). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203891025]Search in Google Scholar
[Redlich, T., Moritz, M., & Wulfsberg, J. P. (Eds.). (2019). Co-creation, reshaping business and society in the era of bottom-up economics. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-97788-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson, C., Yamin, M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2012). Policy-driven clusters, interfirm interactions and firm internationalisation: Some insights from Malaysia’s Multimedia Super Corridor. International Business Review, 21(5), 794-805.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.09.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rothgang, M., Cantner, U., Dehio, J., Engel, D., Fertig, M., Graf, H., & Töpfer, S. (2017). Cluster policy: Insights from the German leading-edge cluster competition. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3(3), 1-20.10.1186/s40852-017-0064-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting, R. C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., & Jozinović, P. (2015). Industry 4.0–Potentials for creating smart products: Empirical research results. In W. Abramowicz (Ed.), BIS 2015 (pp. 16-27). Springer International Publishing Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_210.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Schuh, G., Potente, T., Wesch-Potente, C., Weber, A., & Prote, J. P. (2014). Collaboration mechanisms to increase productivity in the context of Industrie 4.0. (Robust Manufacturing Conference Procedia CIRP 19, pp. 51-56).10.1016/j.procir.2014.05.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Sölvell, Ö. (2015). Construction of the cluster commons. In D. B. Audretsch, A. N. Link, & M. Lindenstein Walshok (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of local competitiveness (pp. 84-101). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strange, R., & Zucchella, A. (2017). Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business. Multinational Business Review, 25(3), 174-184.10.1108/MBR-05-2017-0028]Search in Google Scholar
[Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.10.2307/2393808]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vanninen, H., Kuivalainen, O., & Ciravegna, L. (2016). Rapid multinationalization: Propositions for studying born micromultinationals. International Business Review, 26(2), 365-379.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Verbeke, A. (2018), EIBA 2018 Conference Poznan, International Business Research in the Information and Digital Age – mimeo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Voigt, K. I. (2008). Industrielles Management: Industriebetriebslehre aus prozessorientierter Sicht. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Welch, C., & Paavilainen-Mäntymä:ki, E. (2014). Putting process (back) in: Research on the internationalization process of the firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(1), 2-23.10.1111/ijmr.12006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 740-762.10.1057/jibs.2010.55]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Weresa, M. A. (2019). Technological competitiveness of the EU member states in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Economics and Business Review, 3(19), 50-71.10.18559/ebr.2019.3.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Yamamura, S., & Lassalle, P. (2019). Proximities and the emergence of regional industry: Evidence of the liability of smallness in Malta. European Planning Studies. doi :10.1080/09654313.2019.166891510.1080/09654313.2019.1668915]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zaefarian, R., Eng, T. Y., & Tasavori, M. (2016). An exploratory study of international opportunity identification among family firms. International Business Review, 25(1), 333-345.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.06.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar